WBD templates
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was no consensus to merge or do not merge Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:00, 22 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Propose merging Template:Warner Bros. Discovery Networks, Template:Warner Bros. Discovery Sports & News and Template:Warner Bros. Discovery Enterprises with Template:Warner Bros. Discovery.
I think what we've done on the main navbox is being duplicated on these three navboxes, and putting our focus on the main template should make our task easier in terms of modifications in the future. –Piranha249 (Discuss with me) 17:02, 7 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- However, let's wait as Warner Bros. Discovery is only at the beginning of its plans. The Networks, Sports/News, and Enterprises don't necessarily fall into the same subjects.
- A lot could happen. MegaSmike46 (talk) 13:57, 8 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 23:19, 14 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Oppose and I'm also wondering at what point are you going to stop nominating this with your last nomination being 6 months ago. Template:Warner Bros. Discovery (as you wish to see it) will be huge and bloated and will be practically useless for navigation. A navigation template should not replace the category system. See WP:NAVBOX which says
Navigation templates are particularly useful for a small, well-defined group of articles
- using the very top parent company as the bases for the template and trying to add everything is not that. Gonnym (talk) 08:07, 15 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Also, to any closing admin, as the creator of one the templates and the one Piranha249 knows will oppose, I was not notified of the template being deleted (as is stated in step 3 of WP:TFDHOWTO). Gonnym (talk) 08:11, 15 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- First of all, I apologize for not notifying you ahead of time, as I thought listing the proposal would be enough. Secondly, I would wish to compromise by merging just the News and Sports navbox into the main navbox, as it's clear this division doesn't exist anymore. Would you like this, @Gonnym, @Izno, and @MegaSmike46? –Piranha249 (Discuss with me) 17:15, 21 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- WBD Networks may still exist as many companies keep their Network divisions separate. The resulting merger of WarnerMedia & Discovery encouraged more reorganization. The template goes into further detail about the division.
- Cartoon Network Inc. and other groups now operate separately from WBD and WB. MegaSmike46 (talk) 17:38, 21 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- This would clearly be the wrong direction given how bloated the supposed target template is. Keep. Izno (talk) 16:05, 21 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Metrô Rio color
Template:SuperVia color
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:38, 21 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
replaced by Module:Adjacent stations/SuperVia Frietjes (talk) 14:44, 14 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Delete per nom. Gonnym (talk) 08:35, 15 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Invitation to the WPTO
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:37, 21 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Invite template for a page that was deleted at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Wikipedian Peace Treatment Organization. Following that discussion the template was updated to point at some users sandbox/junk page. We do not need an invite template for either a deleted project space page or some random user's sandbox. Delete, and IMO, it isn't worth substituting the two talk page uses. 163.1.15.238 (talk) 14:31, 14 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:München bahnhof
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:37, 21 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Unused and replaced with Module:Adjacent stations/Munich S-Bahn. Gonnym (talk) 12:52, 14 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:MVG style
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:37, 21 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Unused and replaced with Module:Adjacent stations/Munich U-Bahn. Gonnym (talk) 12:37, 14 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:NOVOSIBIRSKMETRO color
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:46, 21 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Unused and superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/Novosibirsk Metro. Gonnym (talk) 07:49, 14 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Infobox Atlanta broadcasting network
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Ponyo (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:01, 14 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
There is no need for wrapper templates for Atlanta, or for any other city. The amount of maintenance burden that we would be stuck with if every city had a template is insane. Gonnym (talk) 07:41, 14 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was keep. Izno (talk) 05:37, 21 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Fails WP:NENAN as it links (no pun intended) only four articles. Last TFD closed as "no consensus" Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 02:20, 14 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- keep, passes WP:NENAN. Frietjes (talk) 11:31, 14 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Keep WP:NENAN is an essay written by the nominator. Links five articles, as I reverted the nominator's redirection of one (after the AfD closed as no consensus). NemesisAT (talk) 11:48, 14 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).