The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 05:53, 6 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Largest cities of Jordan (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Single-use article content template. Subst and delete. – Jonesey95 (talk) 23:58, 29 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Delete Subst per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:32, 30 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Delete No reason for this template (because the content isn't shared between articles). Subst and delete. — hike395 (talk) 14:37, 30 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 05:55, 6 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Rockford and Interurban (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and no mainspace for use. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:02, 29 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Pinging Mackensen, who was working on a list of these unused route diagram templates at User:Mackensen/Unused RDT diagrams. Mackensen: please see this and other nominations on this page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 23:59, 29 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Comment. I don't think there's a valid mainspace use until Rockford and Interurban Railway is written. Lost on Belmont isn't very active these days and from experience interurbans are hard to write about. Mackensen (talk) 00:04, 30 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Userfy to Lost on Belmont until parent article is written. Useddenim (talk) 03:15, 30 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Userfy. As Mackensen pointed out, I’m not too active right now, so an article isn’t likely to be coming soon, but I do still plan on eventually creating one. I’d like to keep the template for that time. Lost on  Belmont  ^3200N_1000W  (talk) 00:12, 31 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 22:24, 5 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Manila LRT Yellow Line (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not needed as LRT Line 1 (Metro Manila) has detailed route map in the infobox. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:14, 29 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Delete; redundant and superseded. Mackensen (talk) 00:04, 30 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Delete — DaxServer (t · m · c) 20:35, 30 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:10, 5 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Sōtetsu and Tōkyū Shin-Yokohama Lines (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and nothing but text. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:06, 29 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Delete. Not sure how this would even be used? Mackensen (talk) 00:05, 30 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Delete — DaxServer (t · m · c) 20:35, 30 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• delete: unused; functioning navbox templates for the tokyu/sotetsu shin-yokohama lines already exist and are used at their respective articles. Nyamo Kurosawa (talk) 19:30, 31 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Delete per everyone else. XtraJovial (talk • contribs) 15:06, 1 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2023 February 5. Izno (talk) 22:24, 5 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Khulna-Dhaka_line (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Khulna-Rajshahi_line (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was move to correct title Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:13, 5 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Khulna-Mongla Port line (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Khulna–Mongla Port line (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

((Khulna-Mongla Port line)) (with hyphen) is used; ((Khulna–Mongla Port line)) (with en-dash) is the unused one. Useddenim (talk) 03:48, 30 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Merge both. We have templates for the same line. We can merge them. Mehedi Abedin 03:55, 30 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

If one of the Khulna–Mongla templates is to be kept, it should be the one with the dash (not hyphen) in the title, per MOS. The hyphenated template should be redirected to the merge target. Content from whichever template is better should end up at the merge target. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:58, 30 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Jonesey95: The correct content is at hyphen, so it should be moved to Ndash and become a redirect. I think that might require an admin for the WP:HISTMERGE? Useddenim (talk) 01:01, 2 February 2023 (UTC) Useddenim (talk) 01:01, 2 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2023 February 5. Izno (talk) 21:55, 5 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Fatehabad–Kaptai_line (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 21:55, 5 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:East–West Trunk Line (RIT) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and no articles for use. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:50, 29 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Delete; the East–West Trunk Line isn't even mentioned in Rede Integrada de Transporte. Mackensen (talk) 00:11, 30 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:02, 5 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Thiruvananthapuram Monorail Map (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:13, 29 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Delete; unused, and per Thiruvananthapuram Light Metro the monorail concept was abandoned in 2014. Mackensen (talk) 00:12, 30 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Delete; It's unused. Monorail is abandoned and Template:Thiruvananthapuram Light Metro is used for the new project. AG47 ^Talk 08:10, 30 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Delete per nomination. Another useless template. Fad Ariff (talk) 13:04, 2 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2023 February 5. Izno (talk) 20:12, 5 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Edmonton–Drumheller_train_map (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 20:09, 5 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Coast Rail Corridor (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:56, 29 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Delete. No article on Coast Rail Corridor. Mackensen (talk) 00:18, 30 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2023 February 5. Izno (talk) 20:10, 5 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:PNR_Northrail (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2023 February 5. Izno (talk) 20:10, 5 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Olive_Subdivision (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Perris_Valley_Subdivision (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:SCRRA_Valley_Subdivision (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Shortway_Subdivision (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:River_Subdivision (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2023 February 5. Izno (talk) 20:11, 5 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:UGM_Bus_Route (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Izno (talk) 20:10, 5 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Seattle Subdivision (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:25, 29 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Keep. Someone forgot to add it to Northern Transcon. I have done so. – Jonesey95 (talk) 00:05, 30 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2023 February 5. Izno (talk) 20:10, 5 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Black_Butte_Subdivision (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Cima_Subdivision (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Caliente_Subdivision (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Fresno_Subdivision (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Los_Angeles_Subdivision (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Los_Nietos_Subdivision (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Mojave_Subdivision (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Niles_Subdivision (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Tracy_Subdivision_(UP) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:UP_La_Habra_Subdivision (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:UP_San_Pedro_Subdivision (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:UP_Wilmington_Subdivision (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Valley_Subdivision (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2023 February 5. Izno (talk) 20:11, 5 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Bakersfield_Subdivision (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2023 February 5. Izno (talk) 20:11, 5 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Guerneville_Branch (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 18:35, 5 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Mojahedin offshoots (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused chart format template. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:38, 29 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Delete per nomination. This is a useless template that formed part of a larger scheme of articles, all of which have now been deleted for not being notable and WP:OR. Fad Ariff (talk) 13:02, 2 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Izno (talk) 18:35, 5 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Turco-Mongol (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Mongol Empire (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Turco-Mongol with Template:Mongol Empire.
I propose merging Template:Turco-Mongol (created in 2020) into Template:Mongol Empire (created in 2007). They already largely overlap, and I think the content in Template:Turco-Mongol (which essentially has Turco-Mongol tradition, i.e. the political and cultural legacy of the Mongol Empire, as its subject) can easily be explained in the context of Template:Mongol Empire. A merger would not cause any template-size problems (because it is autocollapsible) or weighting problems in Template:Mongol Empire. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 15:52, 29 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Oppose They cover different topics. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:37, 30 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Oppose any argument which argues: "Turco-Mongol tradition, i.e. the political and cultural legacy of the Mongol Empire," is fundamentally flawed from the get-go. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:47, 30 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 18:35, 5 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:BSA, Western Region, Area 4, Council locations (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:BSA, Western Region, Area 3, Council locations (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused maps. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:30, 29 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please move them to somewhere in my userspace rather than delete them. Thanks! Banaticus (talk) 00:57, 30 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 18:33, 5 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Template:Vandalism (band) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

WP:NENAN, only three four targets. Muhandes (talk) 14:47, 29 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:32, 30 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).