National Football League (Ireland) Division 3/4 tables
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:43, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
unused after being merged with the parent articles. Frietjes (talk) 21:24, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Releases openSUSE
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:48, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Single-article content template with no template parameters. Subst into article and delete template. – Jonesey95 (talk) 20:16, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:1991 CONCACAF Gold Cup group tables
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:46, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
unused after being merged with the parent article. Frietjes (talk) 19:54, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Row-break
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:46, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
unused Frietjes (talk) 19:17, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Israel WBC record
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:46, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
unused, duplicates the table in the article Frietjes (talk) 19:16, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Gold medallist
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:45, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
unused Frietjes (talk) 19:12, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:GNF Ortholog box
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:44, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
unused Frietjes (talk) 19:11, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:44, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
per prior discussion Frietjes (talk) 19:10, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Bb-state-big
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:44, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
unused. Frietjes (talk) 18:11, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Unused ZSU templates
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2023 June 16. Primefac (talk) 07:30, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Central platform box
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:43, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Single-use template. Mikeblas (talk) 16:44, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Copa Libertadores standings templates
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 15:06, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
no longer in use after being merged with the parent articles per prior discussion. Frietjes (talk) 15:06, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Medieval Lands by Charles Cawley
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:31, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Since 2012, the Reliable Source Noticeboard has repeatedly identified fmg.ac (Foundation for Medieval Genealogy) / Medieval Lands by Charles Cawley as an unreliable source (in 2010 there seems not to have been a consensus yet). In 2012, Template talk:Medieval Lands by Charles Cawley#Medieval Lands is not a reliable source established an odd compromise, namely including the standard warning [self-published source][better source needed] into the template, even though Medieval Lands by Charles Cawley is a clear violation of WP:SELFPUB, which states: Self-published expert sources may be considered reliable when produced by an established subject-matter expert, whose work in the relevant field has previously been published by reliable, independent publications.
User:ActivelyDisinterested already indicated that Charles Cawley "is a retired corporate lawyer who now devotes himself full time to historical research". That doesn't seem to be a "relevant field". There seems to be no reason to exempt Cawley from WP:SELFPUB. This template is currently used 576 times on English Wikipedia, even though we have known for at least 11 years that it is an unreliable source. Time to do what is right, and purge it.
Background information:
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#fmg.ac (Foundation for Medieval Genealogy). Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 06:50, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- This should go. Multiple discussions at RSN have shown that MLs misuses sources, uses sources that are known forgeries, and uncritically uses primaries sources. It's not a reliable source. I'm not sure what happens here, as the template is still in use. But if any work is required I'd be willing to help -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆transmissions∆ °co-ords° 12:38, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Support deletion, from the discussion it appears the intention was always to phase out its use. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 16:17, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- @ActivelyDisinterested @Horse Eye's Back I'm very glad you agree with me and support this nomination. This is only the second time that I've really made a submission at RSN, and the first time we were on opposite sides and you didn't exactly go easy on me, but you turned out to be justified in doing so. I'm glad to be on the same side now. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 22:33, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).