Requests to unexplode users exploded after discussion here, and debate whether discussions here have been properly closed, both take place at Wikipedia:Explosion review, in accordance with Wikipedia's unexplosion policy. Due to technical limitations, namely medical science's inability to resurrect the dead, users which have gained consensus for unexplosion are added to a list, pending unexplosion at a time when resurrection is technically feasible.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete. Page has been inactive for a year. This is obviously because they've been planning to delete Wikipedia's Main Page. We must stop Page before they delete our Main Page! ARandomPage, the named space (talk • contribs) 13:00, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Epicgenius is an amazing editor with many edits. In particular, his contributions to New York City-related articles are tremendously invaluable. However, he persistently refuses to run for adminship, and as such, is starting to constitute a NETNEGATIVE for Wikipedia. As such, I propose that he be deleted. He may be undeleted in order to participate in his RFA. [April Fools!] —k6ka🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 00:00, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
delete. also support indeffing Mr. Genius as WP:NOTHERE... this has gone on too long ... sawyer * he/they * talk 00:05, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Give him a moyai statue – Epicgenius (talk) 02:13, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:U5. Who writes their user page in third person besides self-promoters? LilianaUwU(talk / contributions) 02:32, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete – Almost looks like a NOTWEBHOST violation but not blatantly so not a candidate for U5. However, I didn't expect for the subject to be an admin sice he's a perfect young man that brought GAs and FAs. However, let's indef him until he explicitly says to run for adminship.[April Fools!]Toadette(April Fools Day!) 05:58, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete per nom; whack with a wet moai. QueenofHearts 08:04, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete. At 22:38 on March 31, user was heard to say that things were "too damn quiet" in wiki-land, thereby precipitating what will probably become an entire day of shenanigans. Someone with so many hats and years of experience should know better than to have created April 1. DMacks (talk) 04:25, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Move to Wales, Redirect to Whale, cue Duck Test by seeing what they sound like, then explode. That'd be an exploding wailingwhale named Wales at Wales. 💜 melecie talk - 14:34, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Whale Jimbo Wales:
Smash!
You've been squished by a whale!
Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know you did something really silly.
Xingqiu is best at using Hydro to his advantage to protect his teammates. Therefore, I think by nominating Xingqiu for deletion he would be able to protect himself with his Hydro swords. Let's try. Aasim - Herrscher of Wikis ❄️ 15:23, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
It's unoriginal and stupid, but someone had to. MainPeanut (talk) 13:25, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Procedural close; user has already been overthrown. P.S. Since I was the person who closed that discussion, I have decided to take this nomination as a personal attack. MJLMaster 15:25, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Obvious vandalism and no real edits throughout his years of slaving away to the wikipedia gods. ~ Idan (username is Zvikorn) (talk) 08:25, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Sentence to death because 57 ate nine. Panini📚 10:41, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the reasoning is simple here. 5+7=12. Twelve has 6 letters. 6+6+6=666. 666 is the devil. Therefore, this user is the devil and we must delete it. D🐶ggy54321(let's chat!) 13:35, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Obvious sock of whoever is reading this. Yes, you. As they are not allowed to be blocked via policy, they must be deleted. HotdogPi 11:38, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete So nobody can ever edit under this address again. We’ve had two misconfigurations already in the past. Enough is enough! --Heymid (contribs) 15:27, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the UfD talk page or in a rant). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.
The result was overthrow. JJPMaster 19:55, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for showing bad faith to unregistered users 141.92.129.42 (talk) 12:56, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete what's a Jimbo Wales? Delete per WP:IHATETOSAYITIHOPEIDONTSOUNDRIDICULOUSIDONTKNOWWHOTHISMANIS. D🐶ggy54321(let's chat!) 13:31, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. And also delete ChekhovsGunman for daring to nominate Jimbo in the first place. (Although I have no idea who Jimbo is) REDMAN 2019 (talk) 13:33, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
There are three impostors. O.N.R was the first one and Zvikorn is definitely the other one as shown above. And you look pretty sus trying to defend him... REDMAN 2019 (talk) 14:26, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Wrong, there are two impostors. O.N.R. was ejected and it showed One impostor remaining. It’s also pretty sus for you to switch between indent styles, which is illegal per MOS:INDENTMIX. D🐶ggy54321(let's chat!) 14:29, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Then doesn't that confirm Zvikorn's guilt? REDMAN 2019 (talk) 14:40, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]