Wikipedia:WikiProject Feminism
Wikipedia:Feminism

The following discussion is an archived proposal of the WikiProject below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the project's talk page (if created) or the WikiProject Council). No further edits should be made to this page.

The resulting WikiProject was created at Wikipedia:WikiProject Feminism

Description[edit]

A project to coordinate work on feminism-related articles. This is actually an upgrade request, as WikiProject Gender Studies/Feminism Task Force already exists but has outgrown the parent project and should be spun off into an independent child project. Kaldari (talk) 20:14, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support[edit]

Please specify whether or not you would join the project.

  1. Kaldari (talk) 20:14, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  2. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 20:23, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  3. If feminism could be technically its own WikiProject you might have more contributions. -SusanLesch (talk) 20:11, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  4. -- Cirt (talk) 21:45, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Sure, I'll join. Scartol • Tok 22:47, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  6. I would support this. Lumos3 (talk) 23:03, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Good idea. --Danger (talk) 23:35, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Thanks for the invitation. I don't really understand all the technicalities but will support anything that raises feminist presence here. Mgoodyear (talk) 01:16, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Sure, seems there is enough interest and content work to be done for a full Wikiproject. --FloNight♥♥♥♥ 01:27, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Sure needs doing. Rebecca (talk) 02:10, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Happy to join.Malke2010 16:06, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Awadewit (talk) 23:56, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  13. I support this. I'm more interested in gender studies than feminism though, so I'm unlikely to join. --Alynna (talk) 10:51, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Jagged 85 (talk) 16:51, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Seldom a better cause. AishwaryaJain (talk) 00:54, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Strong support. I've seen a need for a feminism-specific WikiProject for a long time. I tried to gather interest for such a project a few years ago but failed miserably. The feedback I got dwelt on it being perceived as an advocacy group rather than an effort to improve articles in this area. Argh. Really wasn't my goal. I'll help. Pigman☿/talk 01:24, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Of course I will! correogsk (talk) 08:26, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Sounds like a good idea to me and I'll support it! FemWriter (talk) 08:04, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Excellent idea. Support but unlikely to help. Kittybrewster ☎ 00:46, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Long time needed... --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 10:59, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Seems like a good idea, certainly enough content. Rockpocket 22:28, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Definitely a good idea, I would join the WikiProject. ›mysid (☎∆✎) 08:12, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion[edit]

This project was founded as a taskforce of WikiProject Gender Studies. I think it would be a good idea, however, for us to switch to being a child project rather than a taskforce. Firstly, this project operates mostly independently of WikiProject Gender Studies. I think most of the editors involved in this project tend to think of it as independent as there isn't much cross-communication with the main project as you see with other taskforces. Secondly, we miss out on a lot of services that are provided specifically for WikiProjects. Getting things like stats and alerts is a pain to set up if you're technically part of another WikiProject and live on a sub-page. Moving to our own page would make this much simpler. If there is consensus for such a move, I would be happy to handle all the heavy lifting. I can re-tag all of our articles with a bot and fix everything else by hand. Thoughts? Kaldari (talk) 20:03, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kaldari, looks to me like there is support for the idea. I need to look though my articles to see if there are some I started in March for US Women's History Month and neglected to label. FloNight♥♥♥♥ 18:41, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Cool, I'll go ahead and make the template. Stay tuned... Kaldari (talk) 18:46, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the project's talk page (if created) or at the WikiProject Council). No further edits should be made to this page.
Category