Deletion SortingProject (talk)Project page Lists (by ABC) Lists (by topic) AfD: Today, Yesterday Delsort scripts .mw-parser-output .navbar{display:inline;font-size:88%;font-weight:normal}.mw-parser-output .navbar-collapse{float:left;text-align:left}.mw-parser-output .navbar-boxtext{word-spacing:0}.mw-parser-output .navbar ul{display:inline-block;white-space:nowrap;line-height:inherit}.mw-parser-output .navbar-brackets::before{margin-right:-0.125em;content:"[ "}.mw-parser-output .navbar-brackets::after{margin-left:-0.125em;content:" ]"}.mw-parser-output .navbar li{word-spacing:-0.125em}.mw-parser-output .navbar-mini abbr{font-variant:small-caps;border-bottom:none;text-decoration:none;cursor:inherit}.mw-parser-output .navbar-ct-full{font-size:114%;margin:0 7em}.mw-parser-output .navbar-ct-mini{font-size:114%;margin:0 4em}.mw-parser-output .infobox .navbar{font-size:100%}.mw-parser-output .navbox .navbar{display:block;font-size:100%}.mw-parser-output .navbox-title .navbar{float:left;text-align:left;margin-right:0.5em}vte

This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Food and drink. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.

Adding a new AfD discussion
Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:
  1. Edit this page and add ((Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName)) to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary, it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
  2. You should also tag the AfD by adding ((subst:delsort|Food and drink|~~~~)) to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.
Note that there are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.
Removing a closed AfD discussion
Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.
Other types of discussions
You can also add and remove links to other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Food and drink.
Further information
For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.


Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:
Purge page cache watch

Food and drink

Derrick Lonsdale

AfDs for this article:
Derrick Lonsdale (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | ) – (View AfD)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · newspapers · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · TWL)

As per discussion on the fringe theories noticeboard. Seems to be promotional .

Although (as said on the noticeboard and previous deletion discussions) some of his research has been widely cited, the article as it is, is too promotional and would need a serious overhaul - I think a deletion and starting from scratch would be better if someone else wants to do this.

These issues have seemingly been around since 2006, so I think it's clear that nobody is actually going to fix them now. -- Bangalamania (talk) 16:20, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Bangalamania (talk) 16:20, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Bangalamania (talk) 16:20, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

Jesse Dunford Wood

AfDs for this article:
Jesse Dunford Wood (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | ) – (View AfD)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · newspapers · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · TWL)

This is partly a procedural nomination. The person exists. He is a chef, but all - or almost all - of the references do not even mention his name. When you do a Google search on his name, you get very little of any value. Bbb23 (talk) 23:10, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 06:55, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 06:55, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 06:56, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

Meal train

Meal train (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | ) – (View AfD)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · newspapers · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:GNG. Another editor discussed the lack of notability on the article talk page in 2016 and I don't see that anything has changed since then. No in-depth discussions of this topic seem to exist in WP:RS. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 20:26, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:00, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwaiiplayer (talk) 12:18, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

BELTUR

BELTUR (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | ) – (View AfD)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · newspapers · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · TWL)

Holding company does not meet WP:NCORP- lacks in-depth coverage in independent sources. MrsSnoozyTurtle 08:45, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

Withdrawn by nominator, thanks to sources found by Styyx. MrsSnoozyTurtle 22:23, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talkcontribs) 09:08, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talkcontribs) 09:08, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talkcontribs) 09:08, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 12:57, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
Hi Styyx, thanks for taking the time to dig up more references. There are two sections of WP:NCORP which I use to see whether a reference meets the criteria for establishing notability. The first is WP:ORGIND and especially the definition of "Independent Content" which says a reference must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. The second is WP:CORPDEPTH which requires in-depth information on the topic organization. The NTV reference appears to rely on a statement made by the company, the additional information in the article is generic COVID19 reopening information and does not meet CORPDEPTH. This first Sabah reference comments on an investigation into one of the company practices, it does not provide in-depth information on the company though. But the second Sabah reference doesn't provide the source for the information revealed in the article (maybe the translation is poor) but otherwise I would say it meets the criteria in my opinion. In a similar vein, this Cumhuriyet reference appears to meet the criteria as it does not rely on information provided by the company and contains enough in-depth information. The T24 reference relies on a statement from the company, fails ORGIND. The Aksam piece is social media gossip, not really worth considering. Since there are two references which in my opinion meet the criteria, I'll change my !vote and thank you again for doing the leg work on this. HighKing++ 20:21, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

Farina bona

Farina bona (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | ) – (View AfD)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · newspapers · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:N. Possible ATD would be merge/redirect or redirect to Onsernone but I'm not sure it is significant enough to make the article. Boleyn (talk) 18:29, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:39, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:39, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Products-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:39, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

Farina bona is recognized as a "Swiss culinary heritage": https://www.patrimoineculinaire.ch/Prodotti?text=Farina+B%C3%B3na&canton=&categorie=#455 --Hadi (talk) 18:29, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 00:08, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

Case knife

AfDs for this article:
Case knife (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | ) – (View AfD)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · newspapers · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · NYT · TWL)

No references at all. Appears to just be another name for a table knife. Nathanielcwm (talk) 04:53, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Nathanielcwm (talk) 04:53, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
–Quote from p. 180: "The collector who specializes in knives made by W. R. Case & sons or other Case-related companies will be pleased with the extensive listing that follows."
As such, this comes across as the most accurate redirect target. North America1000 12:51, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 02:12, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: If kept, in what form? As a dab or article?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 08:03, 9 September 2021 (UTC)

Purge server cache

Proposed deletions

Templates for Discussion