Points of interest related to Italy on Wikipedia:
Outline – History – Portal – Category – WikiProject – Alerts – Deletions – Cleanup – Stubs – Assessment – To-do

Deletion SortingProject (talk)Project page Lists (by ABC) Lists (by topic) Lists (computer-readable) AfD: Today, Yesterday Delsort scripts .mw-parser-output .navbar{display:inline;font-size:88%;font-weight:normal}.mw-parser-output .navbar-collapse{float:left;text-align:left}.mw-parser-output .navbar-boxtext{word-spacing:0}.mw-parser-output .navbar ul{display:inline-block;white-space:nowrap;line-height:inherit}.mw-parser-output .navbar-brackets::before{margin-right:-0.125em;content:"[ "}.mw-parser-output .navbar-brackets::after{margin-left:-0.125em;content:" ]"}.mw-parser-output .navbar li{word-spacing:-0.125em}.mw-parser-output .navbar a>span,.mw-parser-output .navbar a>abbr{text-decoration:inherit}.mw-parser-output .navbar-mini abbr{font-variant:small-caps;border-bottom:none;text-decoration:none;cursor:inherit}.mw-parser-output .navbar-ct-full{font-size:114%;margin:0 7em}.mw-parser-output .navbar-ct-mini{font-size:114%;margin:0 4em}v t e

This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Italy. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.

Adding a new AfD discussion

Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:

Edit this page and add ((Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName)) to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
You should also tag the AfD by adding ((subst:delsort|Italy|~~~~)) to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.

Note that there are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.

Removing a closed AfD discussion

Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.

Other types of discussions

You can also add and remove links to other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Italy.

Further information

For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.

This list is also part of the larger list of deletion debates related to Europe.

Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:

WikiProject Deletion sorting/Italy/archive

Purge page cache

watch

See also: Wikipedia:Italian Wikipedians' Notice Board

Scan for Italy related AfDs

Scan for Italy related Prods
Scan for Italy related TfDs

Italy[edit]

WordLift

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Requested by an IP editor who cannot create this page. I expect they will fill in their deletion rationale here. I am neutral as nominator unless I comment otherwise below. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 18:21, 12 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I‘ll repeat the arguments I put on Talk:WordLift#Proposed deletion:

The company doesn’t seem to meet WP:CORP since it is not the subject of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. The provided sources are often press releases published in minor publications, blogs or can‘t be attributed to the company like the price in 2011 or the book from 2013 when the company was founded in 2017.

Googling for current sources results in the same type of sources as currently in the article: self generated content, no independent reliable sources I could find.

213.55.221.7 (talk) 18:32, 12 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:10, 12 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:10, 12 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:10, 12 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:13, 12 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Michal Janiga

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No particular evidence of notability. Article was created by User:ServareManere, the name of the organization that commissioned his supposed masterpiece. Hm. — Biruitorul ^Talk 20:11, 10 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:15, 10 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Slovakia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:15, 10 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Czech Republic-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:20, 10 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:25, 10 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:25, 10 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ferruccio Diena

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG with a lack of sigcov. Being in the Dizionario della grande Juventus (if reliable and if sigcov) isn't enough. Dougal18 (talk) 16:16, 10 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:19, 10 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:19, 10 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:19, 10 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:19, 10 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. There is no 1929–30 Juventus FC season so cannot redirect to the season, which would be my preferred option for players who made 1 appearance. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 16:35, 10 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Merge and redirect to his brother Armando Diena, if you goto both Italian wiki's you can take the cites and merge all into one English article which would be better. That my thoughts anyway. Govvy (talk) 16:10, 11 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Merge/redirect – Per @Govvy. Svartner (talk) 23:51, 13 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nello Mascia

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The page has been tagged for six months as needing reliable sources, but nothing has been done. If we remove everything that is unsourced then there is nothing left. So either someone should improve it or it should be deleted. Ldm1954 (talk) 22:31, 9 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Ldm1954 (talk) 22:31, 9 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Speedy Keep.@Ldm1954: Just because there is a tag and an issue has been unaddressed (for 6 months!!!!) does not mean that an article needs to be deleted. I'll improve the page but may I ask you to withdraw this, please? He is a fairly notable Italian actor as a quick look at any database can confirm...So either someone should improve it or it should be deleted.. I am sorry but no: either he deserves an article or the page should be deleted. Afd is about deletion not cleanup. Again,I will improve the page, but that's not the point. Anyone nominating a page for deletion should look for sources before doing so. Which is apparently not the case here. Thanks.-My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 23:18, 9 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
If you improve it then I will reverse my nomination, but not until then. Please note that I did a WP:AfD so it could be improved, not a WP:PROD. Ldm1954 (talk) 23:24, 9 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I said I would. ~~I am currently doing it.~~ I added some content and sources. But you SHOULD look for sources yourself before taking a page to Afd (or ProDding it, for that matter). Improvement of pages is not what Afds are for. Pages can be improved thanks to Afds but Afds are not meant for that. Anyway, see for yourself@Ldm1954: but this Afd should in my view be closed as Speedy Keep because you clearly have made no effort to even check if sources existed. At least from what I understand of your rationale and reply. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 23:35, 9 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

And please note that If we remove everything that is unsourced then there is nothing left. was not even true. There was one source and NINE links to notable films in which he played (not to mention an IMDb page, which, although not considered reliable for notability should have given you an idea that you would have to dig a little bit further than a tag on the page before initiating this). You could at least have checked that, in my opinion, even if you didn't want to bother searching the internet, not even for a minute. Please have a look at the page now so that we can avoid wasting more time on this. Thanks.-My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 01:03, 10 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:23, 9 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Keep nominator has misunderstood the Articles for Deletion process. Geschichte (talk) 09:51, 10 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Geschichte, that was a completely inappropriate comment. The response by @Mushy Yank has been what was needed, improvement. However, the current version still contains a table with 15 films, only two of which have RS -- remember that Wikilinks are not considered reliable. If I was feeling nasty I would delete everything which has no sources, in which case... Ldm1954 (talk) 10:39, 10 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Please.....Just CLICK on the films that have an article here!!!!! Is the page without any source at all????? Thank you. If you think further improvements are needed, feel free, but you opened an AfD......this is NOT the article talk page and, from what you are saying, I am sorry, but I fully agree with Geschichte. Hence my Speedy Keep !vote.....no Before has been made and Afds are not for cleanup.....the page is a stub and this is not a GA review.... -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 10:50, 10 February 2024 (UTC).Reply[reply]
You CANNOT use Wikipedia as a source, see Wikipedia is not a reliable source. Those links are considered irrelevant. Please look at Wikipedia:Proveit, the burden of proof is on the editor. I expect that you can validate that he was in those films, but until you do 95% of the article should be deleted. Ldm1954 (talk) 13:27, 10 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Sigh......... -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 14:23, 10 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@User:Ldm1954 Are you at least watching the page so that you can withdraw as you had said? Sources for every feature film have been added. Only did this to save other users' time. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 21:13, 10 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Yes, I saw the films (what about the role?). The TV needs the same attention. Ldm1954 (talk) 00:21, 11 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
You must be joking. This is not a GA review! So, let me try to give an outline of what is apparently the Afd process according to you. You see a page on an actor, with a BLP sources tag, and although the actor is said to have a considerable filmography and the page has a source, nine wikilinks and a link to Imdb, you don't open those and, without checking at all if there are other sources to verify if the actor is notable or not, you take the page to Afd. When the fact that he is fairly notable is brought to your attention, you say If you improve it then I will reverse my nomination, but although the page is vastly improved, you don't. Instead you say I expect that you can validate that he was in those films, concerning his (selected) feature films, but even though this second bizarre request is immediately fulfilled, you still don't withdraw. No, instead you demand the names of the characters he plays when a simple click gives you most of them; and sources for all of his tv roles, when some are presented and external links allow you to verify most of the rest. In the meantime, you repeatedly state that most of the content of the page needs to be deleted if unsourced. It has not occurred to you that the actor looks quite notable enough by now? No? And that this is the only point of this discussion. I have no further comments. So much for saving other people's time. I stand more than ever by my Speedy Keep !vote, and will not edit the article any further. You can do it if you wish. Keep up the good work! -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 09:01, 11 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Please reread the guidelines of material for a BLP:

"Wikipedia's sourcing policy, Verifiability, says that all quotations and any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be attributed to a reliable, published source using an inline citation; material not meeting this standard may be removed."

This is not my rule, this is standard and applies everywhere. Ldm1954 (talk) 09:19, 11 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
That is not the point of this Afd. Afds are for DELETION OF PAGES, not for cleanup. Remove everything you wish from the page. The point here is: is he notable? And why not withdraw as you had said? You can ask for improvements on the article TP, or improve the page yourself if that is what you wish. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 09:27, 11 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Comment: WP:AFDISNOTCLEANUP. Somebodyidkfkdt (talk) 23:49, 11 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Speedy keep, I added a Corriere della Sera article about him, and searching for "Nello Mascia" there are over 900 articles on La Repubblica archives. WP:AFDISNOTCLEANUP, and WP:BEFORE was clearly ignored. The cleanup/referencing work the nominator is asking for could have been done by himself, easily. Some of his comments here look ridicolously inappropriate if not disruptive (eg. 'If I was feeling nasty...'). Competence is required. Cavarrone 08:28, 13 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Now Keep as the issues have largely been resolved, although he still has a loooong list of unsourced TV appearances. This compares to the original which had one RS (in Italian) that he was an actor/director in one play, and no other since Wikipedia is not a RS. Italian is not required.

Ldm1954 (talk) 09:13, 13 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Paul Luna

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No consensus at last AfD, low participation. It is hard to read through the fact that this is written by a nearly-WP:SPA in a promotional way, but it doesn't appear that there are the sources available online to establish he meets WP:BIO or WP:GNG. It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years, so I really hope we can now find a consensus, either way. Boleyn (talk) 18:39, 9 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:15, 9 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:15, 9 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:15, 9 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:15, 9 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:16, 9 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:16, 9 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:16, 9 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:17, 9 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:17, 9 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hawaii-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:17, 9 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:18, 9 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Question: There are a number of references in the article, and in the last AfD, Jfire offered several more: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. Boleyn, why do you feel that these sources don't add up to notability? Toughpigs (talk) 20:33, 9 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Delete: I don't find any mentions of this person from Atlanta, multiple Gsearch hits on a person in the LA area that lost their son. Delete for not meeting notability requirements. The one source used calling him "controversial" is not the best, but it's about all we have. Oaktree b (talk) 21:25, 9 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Keep -- same as I voted in the prior AfD. There's enough sustained coverage in Atlanta-area papers to satisfy WP:GNG. See the newspaper coverage above. Jfire (talk) 21:30, 9 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Keep. Targeted keyword searches yield abundant significant coverage in reliable sources. Just searching with the added keyword "Atlanta", I find moe than a dozen good results, for example: [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20]. Persingo (talk) 09:44, 10 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

List of cities in the European Union by Muslim population

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This list, as a standalone article, fails WP:N guidelines, and would be better suited as a subsection of the Islam in Europe article. This type of listing doesn't make sense as a separate article. There's also no reason for this list to only be covering the European Union rather than Europe as a whole.

In addition, this article is in a terrible state despite years of existence. Most of the items on this list are uncited. Much of the items that ARE cited use information from outdated or inappropriate sources. For example, books (especially decade-old ones) generally aren't a reliable source of information for demographic data.

I propose this article be deleted and a new, higher quality list be inserted into the Islam in Europe article. 296cherry (talk) 18:07, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Islam, Lists, and Europe. 296cherry (talk) 18:07, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:37, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:37, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:37, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:38, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:38, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:38, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:38, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bulgaria-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:38, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:38, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:39, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:39, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:39, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:40, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:41, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:41, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Delete per nom. Youprayteas (talk to me? | contribs) 13:20, 9 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Speedy delete. This has the hint of a WP:CONTENTFORK from Islam in Europe, and the article's contents are best amalgamated into that entry or "Islam in [country]" articles. I'm still shocked by this sentence: some [figures in this article are] estimating the percentage of Muslims by using the percentage of Asians in those cities. IgnatiusofLondon (talk) 16:17, 9 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Agreed, none of the statistics in this list are consistent in how they are produced. Some use "percentage of Arabic speakers", others use "percentage of Asians". What a disaster. 296cherry (talk) 17:32, 9 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Delete
1. The article transgress Wikipedia:No original research.
2. The article depict a misleading picture of muslims in Europe, where muslims inhabit mostly western Europe (and are here since less than one century).
  - Limiting to European Union instead of Europe create systemic bias since a big part of muslims (and muslims in name only) of Europe inhabit countries outside of European Union such
    - Bosnia and Herzegovina
    - Albania
    - european Turkey, including several million in european part of Istanbul
    - european Russia
  - Limiting to cities create systemic bias since muslims (and muslims in name only) of western Europe mostly came from immigration during 20th century so (has stated by the article) «generally live in major urban areas», whereas the muslim population in central and eastern Europe is much older so distribution is more balanced between countryside, towns and cities, see for a good example distribution of muslims in Bulgaria but also
    - Bosnia and Herzegovina
    - Russia
3. If this bias is intentional then the article is an endorsement of the Eurabia narrative, a far-right conspiracytheory which original variant is very similar to The Protocols of the Elders of Zion while other variants are very similar to the Great Replacement narrative, so ping @Thismess, Hairy Dude, Volunteer Marek, Doug Weller, and Horse Eye's Back:
I found two other articles displaying the same patern in their titles and should be deleted:
- Tamil Muslim population by cities
- Tamil Christian population by cities
Visite fortuitement prolongée (talk) 13:03, 10 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Delete I've been canvassed so maybe my vote shouldn't count, but if I'd seen this before being pinged I would have voted delete in any case. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Doug Weller (talk • contribs) 13:10, 10 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Delete per WP:OR and WP:NLIST and the above. Fork of the Muslims in Europe in the intro also has some merit. No objection to a redirect to Muslims in Europe as an ATD. gidonb (talk) 21:48, 10 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Costantino Mario Ruspoli, 4th Prince of Poggio Suasa

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BLP, Fails GNG and NBIO. No sources in article except a geneology page, BEFORE found nothing with WP:SIGCOV from WP:IS WP:RS addressing the subject directly and indepth. BLPs require strong sourcing. // Timothy :: talk 04:42, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Royalty and nobility, Italy, and Brazil. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 07:34, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 09:36, 11 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Delete, could not find any coverage in reliable sources. Shaws username (talk) 14:40, 11 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Delete, this seems to be a non-notable member of the family. Being born into a formerly princely family is no guarantee of notability, as it is not inherited. Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:19, 11 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Stefano De Marchi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This biographical article's sources probably don't indicate notability of the subject (not do they show significant coverage), likely fails WP:GNG, and is written more like an essay; there are already draft versions including Draft:Stefano De Marchi and Draft:Prof. Stefano De Marchi. – 64andtim ^(talk) 14:57, 3 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Mathematics, and Italy. – 64andtim ^(talk) 14:57, 3 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:06, 3 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Keep. It would be a weak keep based on his citations, but I think the existence of a special issue dedicated to him, with in-depth coverage of him, makes the case stronger. As for the existence of left-behind draft versions, I think that is an irrelevancy. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:33, 3 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Keep. Professor De Marchi runs a research group which does a variety of important work in numerical analysis. A number of his/their papers are highly cited and influential (as one example, the Padua points). –jacobolus (t) 21:25, 3 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter123 (visit) 17:12, 10 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Radhika Gupta

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

person does not seem notable, seems purely promotional. User4edits (talk) 12:39, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:40, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:40, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Maharashtra-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:41, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:41, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:41, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:41, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Uttar Pradesh-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:42, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:10, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:10, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:12, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The language and tonality have been revised to meet the Wikipedia content norms/guidelines. Notability has also been improved. Sources have been added as well. Abhi1705 (talk) 07:54, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Comment the sourcing in the article seems to show the notability of the subject. The article needs substantial cleanup to remove WP:PEACOCK and promotional content. I would like to read other editors' opinions with respect to notability.

I do not find her notability as per WP:NBIO or NBASIC/GNG, she has been mentioned sparsely for several reasons as any businessman would. Secondly, where there is any coverage dedicated on the individual such as this, it appears to be paid and even if not, does not establish her notability as a businesswoman.User4edits (talk) 10:56, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:14, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Weak keep Some coverage about her on the Shark Tank show [21]. This isn't the greatest but it's about her in a RS [22]. Oaktree b (talk) 18:11, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Keep The page in not to be like a promotional. She has a public life and sufficient media coverage. Srander (talk) 19:02, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

KEEP : Definitely notable Business Woman, had incredible journey and have created space as global leader in Respective field. Sources needs to be replaced for now article can be shortened with only reliable sources maybe in future secondary sources can be added. Systumm (talk) 12:55, 8 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Delete per nom. Lacks significant coverage. HistoriesUnveiler (talk) 21:09, 13 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Forlivese dialect

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Context: Forlì (population 117,000) is a city in the Italian historical region of Romagna, which comprises the southeastern half of the Italian region of Emilia-Romagna and extends to San Marino and Montefeltro. Romagnol is an endangered dialect, spoken commonly among older generations, with maybe 430,000 speakers.

Summary: We could create possibly dozens of articles about the dialectal idiosyncracies across Romagna's municipalities, which are well-documented across several sources, or we could summarise the differences in the article at Romagnol.

Explanation: Now, don't get me wrong: sources do exist on the Forlivese dialect (e.g. 1). This isn't a WP:GNG issue, though coverage is often or exclusively local. But sources also exist on every other variant in Romagna, and there are a lot to choose from. The crucial point is that Romagnol exhibits a dialectal continuum, "an infinity of Romagnol dialects decreasing from place to place, as continuous variations on a common basis" (2, 3, 4, 5, 6). A quick search reveals sources available on many dialectal varieties, down to the municipal level, e.g. Serravalle (pop. 11,000) [3] or Riccione (pop. 34,500) [7]. I appreciate that Forlì is larger than these cities, but then we also have Ravenna (pop. 159,000) [8], or the example I am most familiar with, Rimini (pop. 148,000) [9], a city that has a different name in Romagnol depending which side of the city you're in. As a point of reference, the Italian-language Wikipedia only affords a standalone article to the dialects of San Marino (noting the differences especially evident in Serravalle's dialect) and Senigallia. The current Forlivese dialect article doesn't actually detail how it differs from other variants of Romagnol, something which also isn't well-discussed in the Romagnol article.

Editor Metaphysicus, who removed my PROD tag on the nominated article, says that the Forlivese dialect is discussed by Dante Aligheri as the purest variant of Romagnol, a fact which that the editor kindly added to the article today (the article was previously unreferenced). That this makes the Forlivese dialect "its own and main version" of Romagnol sounds like editorial synthesis. And Dante's mention is currently pretty much the only distinctive detail the article offers about the Forlivese dialect that cannot be said about varieties of Romagnol in general. And sure, that's a mention with encyclopaedic value, but Santarcangelo (pop. 21,000) [10] has notable Romagnol poets (Tonino Guerra, Raffaello Baldini); Giovanni Antonio Battarra wrote poems in the dialect of Coriano (pop. 10,400); Gino Vendemini [it] did the same for the dialect of Savignano (pop. 18,000) [11]. We can clutch at the available sources (mixing local sources with scholarly inter-dialectal linguistic analyses) to write articles on each local, idiosyncratic variant of Romagnol. Or, rather than writing possibly dozens of articles that are virtually the same with just a paragraph dedicated to the differences, we can detail these differences in a subheading at Romagnol, also highlighting which variants of Romagnol have received the most treatment in published sources. Only then, if individual variants clearly have too much written about them to fit inside the article, might it be worth spinning off articles on local variants. IgnatiusofLondon (talk) 18:48, 11 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Italy, Language, and Literature. IgnatiusofLondon (talk) 18:53, 11 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Italy[edit]

WordLift

Michal Janiga

Ferruccio Diena

Nello Mascia

Paul Luna

List of cities in the European Union by Muslim population

Costantino Mario Ruspoli, 4th Prince of Poggio Suasa

Stefano De Marchi

Radhika Gupta

Forlivese dialect

Others

Categories

Deletion reviews

Miscellaneous

Proposed deletions

Redirects

Templates