Points of interest related to Michigan on Wikipedia: Outline – History – Portal – Category – WikiProject – Alerts – Deletions – Cleanup – Stubs – Assessment

This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Michigan. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.

Adding a new AfD discussion

Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:

1. Edit this page and add ((Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName)) to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
2. You should also tag the AfD by adding ((subst:delsort|Michigan|~~~~)) to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.

Note that there are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.

Removing a closed AfD discussion

Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.

Other types of discussions

You can also add and remove links to other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Michigan.

Further information

For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.

This list is also part of the larger list of deletion debates related to US.

Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:

• WikiProject Deletion sorting/Michigan/archive

Branch Area Career Center

Branch Area Career Center (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability. Article is strongly promotional, including phone and fax (!) numbers. AusLondonder (talk) 17:20, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, and Michigan. AusLondonder (talk) 17:20, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Caster Concepts

Caster Concepts (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject is non-notable. vghfr (✉ Talk) (✏ Contribs) 14:00, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Companies. vghfr (✉ Talk) (✏ Contribs) 14:00, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Engineering and Michigan. Skynxnex (talk) 14:41, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. I see local coverage, and coverage in B2B sources which are generally promotional; neither seems sufficient for notability.— Moriwen (talk) 16:41, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I agree with :Moriwen's analysis and the original deltion rationale.-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:49, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ammar Nemo

Ammar Nemo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not yet notable WP:NACTOR, with only minor roles so far. In a WP:BEFORE search, the only significant coverage I could find was the WDIV-TV source cited, from local television news. Wikishovel (talk) 17:24, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Michigan. Wikishovel (talk) 17:24, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Martial arts. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:17, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ammar Nemo has some pretty significant roles such as Tommy Tom-Tom in Dashing Through the Snow, Sam from BMF, and Tick Tock in Revenge Of The Mask. LionelTechTips (talk) 03:46, 16 March 2024 (UTC)— Note to closing admin: LionelTechTips (talk • contribs) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this AfD. [reply]

Comment Article creator has been indefinitely blocked for sockpuppetry. Their current user page, and subsequent talk page posts, declare a conflict of interest. Wikishovel (talk) 12:40, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: If not for G5, person is not notable enough with only minor coverage. HarukaAmaranth ^春_香 14:07, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Diane Carr

Diane Carr (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of an artist, not properly referenced as passing WP:NARTIST. The main notability claim here is that she and her work exist, which isn't automatically enough in the absence of sufficient third-party coverage about her and her work to clear WP:GNG -- but three of the four footnotes here are primary sources that are not support for notability at all, and the fourth is a single deadlinked newspaper article of purely local interest in the local newspaper of the city where she was living at the time, which is not enough to get her over GNG all by itself if it's the only reliable source in the mix.
Additionally, this has recently undergone several days of vandalism by an anonymous IP who persistently blanked large portions of it, generally with claims that the stuff they were removing was "incorrect", but the quality of the referencing is so poor that I can't even sort out what's correct or not in the first place — none of the sourcing confirms any of the disputed facts, but none of it contradicts them either — and the IP may possibly have a conflict of interest to boot.
Nothing stated here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt her from having to pass GNG on her sourceability. Bearcat (talk) 14:01, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists and United States of America. Bearcat (talk) 14:01, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Michigan. Shellwood (talk) 15:51, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: New York, Pennsylvania, and Washington, D.C.. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:32, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep and add morecites tag. The New York City transit artwork is sourced at the image page, so that source also exists (and sources for the artwork have been added after this nomination). Randy Kryn (talk) 13:35, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletions