This page provides a list of all articles available at PlanetMath in the following topic:
- 37-XX Dynamical systems and ergodic theory.
This list will be periodically updated. Each entry in the list has three fields:
- PM : The first field is the link to the PlanetMath article, along with the article's object ID.
- WP : The second field is either a "guessed" link to a correspondingly named Wikipedia article, produced by the script which generated the list, or one or more manually entered links to the corresponding Wikipedia articles on the subject.
- Status : The third field is the status field, which explains the current status of the entry. The recommended status entries are:
Status |
means PM article
|
N |
not needed
|
A |
adequately covered
|
C |
copied
|
M |
merged
|
NC |
needs copying
|
NM |
needs merging
|
- Please update the WP and Status fields as appropriate.
- if the WP field is correct please remove the qualifier "guess".
- If the corresponding Wikipedia article exists, but the link to it is wrong, please fix the link.
- If you copy or merge an article from PlanetMath, please update the WP and Status fields for that entry.
- If you have any comments, for example, thoughts on how the PlanetMath article compares to the corresponding Wikipedia article(s), please place such comments on a new indented line following the entry. Comments of this kind are very valuable.
Don't forget to include the relevant template if you copy over text or feel like an external link is warranted
- ((planetmath|id=|title=)) for copied over text
- ((planetmath reference|id=|title=)) for an external link
See the main page for examples and usage criteria.
One can use the web-based program Pmform to convert PlanetMath articles to the Wikipedia format. As a side benefit, this tool will place the PlanetMath template for you.
- linas 14:54, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Its a proof, marking as "not needed". linas 14:54, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Its a proof, marking as "not needed". linas 14:54, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- linas 04:23, 5 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- linas 23:26, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- linas 00:16, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- linas 18:56, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- linas 18:56, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Its a proof,, not needed as per current policy. linas 00:30, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- linas 00:20, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- linas 04:00, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- linas 00:28, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- linas 00:28, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- linas 14:14, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- linas 14:43, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- linas 15:40, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- linas 19:27, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Its a proof, noew referenced in article on expansive. linas 19:27, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- linas 16:06, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- linas 14:57, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- linas 19:52, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- linas 15:09, 5 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- linas 17:15, 5 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- PM article appears to have been retired/obsoleted (I get a permissions error on view). linas 20:22, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- linas 17:04, 5 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- linas 01:04, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Its a proof, which we don't copy into WP as a matter of current policy. linas 01:27, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- linas 14:54, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- linas 14:54, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- linas 14:54, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- linas 20:19, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- linas 01:27, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- linas 01:23, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- linas 14:55, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- linas 14:55, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Merged by Charles Matthews on 27 July 2005 linas 14:50, 5 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- linas 00:37, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- linas 04:24, 11 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- PM: Kupka-Smale, id=4359 -- WP guess: Kupka-Smale -- Status:
- linas 19:48, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- linas 14:54, 5 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- linas 04:08, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't think the PM article is good enough to copy. There are many trace formulas, this is a "minor" one; also, its only correct for the fundamental rep, I believe. So 'N for now. linas 03:09, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- linas 00:39, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]