Index · Statistics · Log
Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Pittsburgh Steelers articles by quality statistics

This is the assessment department for the Pittsburgh Steelers WikiProject. This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia articles relating to the Pittsburgh Steelers football team. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.

The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the ((WikiProject Pittsburgh Steelers)) project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Pittsburgh Steelers articles by quality and Category:Pittsburgh Steelers articles by importance.

Template[edit]

An article's assessment is generated from the class and importance parameters in the ((WikiProject Pittsburgh Steelers)) banner on its talk page. As a member of this subproject, you can rate articles within our scope.

Usage

Please note: This template should be transcluded (((WikiProject Pittsburgh Steelers))) and not substituted (subst) because it employs conditional code. Transclusion also allows easy updating of all the project's talk pages without having to edit thousands of pages.

The simplified format for this WikiProject template should look like this:

((WikiProject Pittsburgh Steelers
|class= 
|importance=
))

Field descriptions

class

Options are FA (Featured Article), FL (Featured List), A, GA (Good Article), B, C, Start, Stub, List, Category, Disambig, File, Portal, Project, Redirect, Template and NA (Not Available). If blank, this will default as Unassessed.

Descriptions of the options can be found here.

importance

Options are Top, High, Mid, Low, and NA (non-article). If blank, this will default as Unknown importance.

Descriptions of the options can be found here.

Importance scale[edit]

**Pittsburgh Steelers WikiProject article importance grading scheme**
Label	Criteria	Reader's experience	Editor's experience	Examples
Top	General articles: Reserved exclusively for articles that are vital to the understanding of the Pittsburgh Steelers franchise. This should include any articles or lists on the general topic of the franchise, articles on individual seasons and articles that cover topics that are central to the history of the franchise.	These will be the most likely reader entry points to the subject.	If articles covering these subjects did not exist, they would need to be created.	Pittsburgh Steelers (franchise article), 2010 Pittsburgh Steelers season, List of Pittsburgh Steelers players
Top	Biographic articles: Reserved exclusively for biographic articles covering persons who are vital to the understanding of the Pittsburgh Steelers franchise. This will include articles on all head coaches and particularly noteworthy players (e.g. any Hall of Famers, members of the All-Time team and players named to multiple All-Pro teams or Pro Bowls) and any assistant coaches, team owners or other personnel who are central to the team's history.			Art Rooney, Chuck Noll, Terry Bradshaw, "Mean" Joe Greene, Rod Woodson
High	General articles: Articles that fall just short of being vital in the understanding of the subject as a whole.	Most readers would quickly notice the omission of any of these articles.	These articles are probably among the most actively edited articles in the project.	History of the Pittsburgh Steelers, Steagles
High	Biographic articles: This classification should include articles on players who were very good (but perhaps not multi-year All-Pros), those who were multiple-year starters for the team as well as players or coaches who had long tenures with the team.			Ernie Holmes, Mark Malone, Glen "Pine" Edwards, coach Bud Carson
Mid	General articles: The article covers a topic that has a strong but not vital role in a thorough understanding of the Pittsburgh Steelers.	Many readers will be familiar with the topic being discussed, but a larger majority of readers may have only cursory knowledge of the overall subject.	Articles at this level will cover subjects that are well known but not necessarily vital to understand the subject.	List of Pittsburgh Steelers starting quarterbacks, Browns–Steelers rivalry
Mid	Biographic articles: This should include "journeyman" players who made contributions for only a short period of time (i.e. less than three seasons of service), who were with the team for a number of years but primarily served in a back-up role or higher profile players whose primary contributions were not as Steelers. This category should also include most			Joe Gilliam, Terry Hanratty, Bam Morris, Troy Edwards, Jim Clack, Mike Vrabel, coach Larry Zierlein
Low	General articles: The article is not required knowledge for a broad understanding of the topic, but may cover topics directly or indirectly related to it.	Few readers outside of the topic area may be familiar with the subject matter. It is likely that the reader does not know anything at all about the subject before reading the article.	Articles at this range of importance will often delve into the minutiae of the franchise.	Pittsburgh Steelerettes, Fighting Back: The Rocky Bleier Story
Low	Biographic articles: This should include players who made only minor contributions to the team or none at all (e.g. draft choices who never made the roster, players who played less than one full season).			Carey Davis, A. Q. Shipley, Reggie Harrison
Unknown	The importance of this article has not yet been assessed.		Editors should assess this article and add their assessment of its importance to the subject to the Pittsburgh Steelers project template on the article's talk page.	List of such articles

Quality scale[edit]

Class	Criteria	Reader's experience	Editing suggestions	Example
FA	The article has attained featured article status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured article candidates. More detailed criteria The article meets the featured article criteria: A featured article exemplifies Wikipedia's very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting the policies regarding content for all Wikipedia articles, it has the following attributes. It is: well-written: its prose is engaging and of a professional standard; comprehensive: it neglects no major facts or details and places the subject in context; well-researched: it is a thorough and representative survey of the relevant literature; claims are verifiable against high-quality reliable sources and are supported by inline citations where appropriate; neutral: it presents views fairly and without bias; stable: it is not subject to ongoing edit wars and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured article process; and compliant with Wikipedia's copyright policy and free of plagiarism or too-close paraphrasing. It follows the style guidelines, including the provision of: a lead: a concise lead section that summarizes the topic and prepares the reader for the detail in the subsequent sections; appropriate structure: a substantial but not overwhelming system of hierarchical section headings; and consistent citations: where required by criterion 1c, consistently formatted inline citations using footnotes—see citing sources for suggestions on formatting references. Citation templates are not required. Media. It has images and other media, where appropriate, with succinct captions and acceptable copyright status. Images follow the image use policy. Non-free images or media must satisfy the criteria for inclusion of non-free content and be labeled accordingly. Length. It stays focused on the main topic without going into unnecessary detail and uses summary style where appropriate.	Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information.	No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible.^{[under discussion]}	Jim Thorpe, Heidi Game
FL	The article has attained featured list status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured list candidates. More detailed criteria The article meets the featured list criteria: Prose. It features professional standards of writing. Lead. It has an engaging lead that introduces the subject and defines the scope and inclusion criteria. Comprehensiveness. (a) It comprehensively covers the defined scope, providing at least all of the major items and, where practical, a complete set of items; where appropriate, it has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about the items. (b) statements are sourced where they appear, and they provide inline citations if they contain any of the four kinds of material absolutely required to have citations. (c) In length and/or topic, it meets all of the requirements for stand-alone lists; does not violate the content-forking guideline, does not largely duplicate material from another article, and could not reasonably be included as part of a related article. Structure. It is easy to navigate and includes, where helpful, section headings and table sort facilities. Style. It complies with the Manual of Style and its supplementary pages. (a) Visual appeal. It makes suitable use of text layout, formatting, tables, and colour; and a minimal proportion of items are redlinked. (b) Media files. It has images and other media, if appropriate to the topic, that follow Wikipedia's usage policies, with succinct captions. Non-free images and other media satisfy the criteria for the inclusion of non-free content and are labeled accordingly. (c) Accessibility. It uses proper formating to be accessible to all readers. Bulleted and unbulleted lists and tables are structured correctly. Visual media, if included, utilize alternative (alt) text. Stability. It is not the subject of ongoing edit wars and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured list process.	Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items.	No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available.	List of Pittsburgh Steelers head coaches
A	The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been examined by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class. More detailed criteria The article meets the A-Class criteria: Provides a well-written, clear and complete description of the topic, as described in Wikipedia:Article development. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, appropriately structured, and be well referenced by a broad array of reliable sources. It should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. Only minor style issues and other details need to be addressed before submission as a featured article candidate. See the A-Class assessment departments of some of the larger WikiProjects (e.g. WikiProject Military history).	Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting.	Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving. WP:Peer review may help.	Battle of Nam River (as of June 2014)
GA	The article meets all of the good article criteria, and has been examined by one or more impartial reviewers from WP:Good article nominations. More detailed criteria A good article is: Well-written: the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct; and it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. Verifiable with no original research: it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline; reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose); it contains no original research; and it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. Broad in its coverage: it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content; and media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (though not necessarily equalling) the quality of a professional publication.	Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing.	Myron Cope, John Mitchell (American football coach), 2008 Pittsburgh Steelers season
B	The article meets all of the B-Class criteria. It is mostly complete and does not have major problems, but requires some further work to reach good article standards. More detailed criteria The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations. It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited. Any format of inline citation is acceptable: the use of <ref> tags and citation templates such as `((cite web))` is optional. The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. It contains a large proportion of the material necessary for an A-Class article, although some sections may need expansion, and some less important topics may be missing. The article has a defined structure. Content should be organized into groups of related material, including a lead section and all the sections that can reasonably be included in an article of its kind. The article is reasonably well-written. The prose contains no major grammatical errors and flows sensibly, but it does not need to be "brilliant". The Manual of Style does not need to be followed rigorously. The article contains supporting materials where appropriate. Illustrations are encouraged, though not required. Diagrams, an infobox etc. should be included where they are relevant and useful to the content. The article presents its content in an appropriately understandable way. It is written with as broad an audience in mind as possible. The article should not assume unnecessary technical background and technical terms should be explained or avoided where possible.	Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher.	A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the Manual of Style and related style guidelines.	Lynn Swann, Hines Ward, Tony Dungy
C	The article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup. More detailed criteria The article cites more than one reliable source and is better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but it fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements, or need editing for clarity, balance, or flow.	Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study.	Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve cleanup problems.	Art Rooney, Franco Harris, Steagles, 2007 Pittsburgh Steelers season
Start	An article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources. More detailed criteria The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas. The article has one or more of the following: A useful picture or graphic Multiple links that help explain or illustrate the topic A subheading that fully treats an element of the topic Multiple subheadings that indicate material that could be added to complete the article	Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more.	Providing references to reliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Also improve the grammar, spelling, writing style and improve the jargon use.	Andy Russell (American football), Ernie Stautner, Jon Kolb
Stub	A very basic description of the topic. Meets none of the Start-Class criteria.	Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are significant.	Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is significant.	Bennie Cunningham, Sam Davis (American football), Hardy Nickerson
List	Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list or set index article, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area.	There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader.	Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized.	List of Pittsburgh Steelers starting quarterbacks
Category	Any category falls under this class.	Categories are mainly used to group together articles within a particular subject area.	Large categories may need to be split into one or more subcategories. Be wary of articles that have been miscategorized.	Category:Card-Pitt players, Category:The Steel Curtain
Disambig	Any disambiguation page falls under this class.	The page serves to distinguish multiple articles that share the same (or similar) title.	Additions should be made as new articles of that name are created. Pay close attention to the proper naming of such pages, as they often do not need "(disambiguation)" appended to the title.	Big Ben (disambiguation), Jack Lambert
File	Any page in the file namespace falls under this class.	The page contains an image, a sound clip or other media-related content.	Make sure that the file is properly licensed and credited.	File:AFCN-Uniform-PIT.PNG, File:Heinz Field.jpg
Portal	Any page in the portal namespace falls under this class.	Portals are intended to serve as "main pages" for specific topics.	Editor involvement is essential to ensure that portals are kept up to date.	Portal:American football
Project	All WikiProject-related pages fall under this class.	Project pages are intended to aid editors in article development.	Develop these pages into collaborative resources that are useful for improving articles within the project.	Wikipedia:WikiProject National Football League/Pittsburgh Steelers subproject/to do
Redirect	Any redirect falls under this class.	The page redirects to another article with a similar name, related topic or that has been merged with the original article at this location.	Editor involvement is essential to ensure that articles are not mis-classified as redirects, and that redirects are not mis-classified as articles.	"Mean" Joe Greene, Art Rooney, Sr., Dobre Shunka
Template	Any template falls under this class. The most common types of templates include infoboxes and navboxes.	Different types of templates serve different purposes. Infoboxes provide easy access to key pieces of information about the subject. Navboxes are for the purpose of grouping together related subjects into an easily accessible format, to assist the user in navigating between articles.	Infoboxes are typically placed at the upper right of an article, while navboxes normally go across the very bottom of a page. Beware of too many different templates, as well as templates that give either too little, too much, or too specialized information.	((Pittsburgh Steelers All-Time Team)), ((Pittsburgh Steelers roster))
NA	Any non-article page that fits no other classification.	The page contains no article content.	Look out for misclassified articles. Currently, many NA-class articles may need to be re-classified.