Netherlands pages by quality
Quality
	Total
FA	54
FL	14
A	1
GA	171
B	804
C	2,887
Start	11,702
Stub	17,080
List	856
Category	13,639
Disambig	53
File	254
Portal	9
Project	27
Redirect	715
Template	1,094
NA	1
Assessed	49,361
Unassessed	2
Total	49,363
WikiWork factors (?)		ω = 175,293			Ω = 5.36

Welcome to the assessment department of the Netherlands WikiProject! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's Netherlands related articles. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.

The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the ((WikiProject Netherlands)) project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Netherlands articles by quality, which serves as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.

How can I get my article rated?

Please list it in the section for assessment requests below.

Who can assess articles?

Any member of the Netherlands WikiProject is free to add or change the rating of an article. It is however considered ethical conduct not to assess articles in the writing of which you yourself has been an important editor

Can I rank an article as I like?

No. Every editor can award stub, start, C, and B class. However, the higher quality labels require more. Good Article and Featured Article status can only be awarded to articles that have gone through the official Wikipedia nomination procedures. A-class assessment are reserved for very good articles, and should have received and fairly addressed extensive peer review (from within or outside the project).

Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments?

Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning.

What if I don't agree with a rating?

You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it; if it has indeed been improved; or the rating was unfair, a better quality will be assigned. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.

I agreed with the low rating, but I have now improved the article, how can I get my rating up?

Again, you can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.

Aren't the ratings subjective?

Yes, they are, but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!

If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.

Quality assessments

An article's quality assessment is generated from the class parameter in the ((WikiProject Netherlands)) project banner on its talk page:

The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article (see Wikipedia:Content assessment for assessment criteria):

FA (for featured articles only; adds articles to Category:FA-Class Netherlands articles)		FA
A (adds articles to Category:A-Class Netherlands articles)		A
GA (for good articles only; adds articles to Category:GA-Class Netherlands articles)		GA
B (adds articles to Category:B-Class Netherlands articles)		B
C (adds articles to Category:C-Class Netherlands articles)		C
Start (adds articles to Category:Start-Class Netherlands articles)		Start
Stub (adds articles to Category:Stub-Class Netherlands articles)		Stub
FL (for featured lists only; adds articles to Category:FL-Class Netherlands articles)		FL
List (adds articles to Category:List-Class Netherlands articles)		List

For non-standard grades and non-mainspace content, the following values may be used for the class parameter:

After assessing an article's quality, any comments on the assessment can be added to the article's talk page.

Quality scale

Class	Criteria	Reader's experience	Editing suggestions	Example
FA	The article has attained featured article status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured article candidates. More detailed criteria The article meets the featured article criteria: A featured article exemplifies Wikipedia's very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting the policies regarding content for all Wikipedia articles, it has the following attributes. It is: well-written: its prose is engaging and of a professional standard; comprehensive: it neglects no major facts or details and places the subject in context; well-researched: it is a thorough and representative survey of the relevant literature; claims are verifiable against high-quality reliable sources and are supported by inline citations where appropriate; neutral: it presents views fairly and without bias; stable: it is not subject to ongoing edit wars and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured article process; and compliant with Wikipedia's copyright policy and free of plagiarism or too-close paraphrasing. It follows the style guidelines, including the provision of: a lead: a concise lead section that summarizes the topic and prepares the reader for the detail in the subsequent sections; appropriate structure: a substantial but not overwhelming system of hierarchical section headings; and consistent citations: where required by criterion 1c, consistently formatted inline citations using footnotes—see citing sources for suggestions on formatting references. Citation templates are not required. Media. It has images and other media, where appropriate, with succinct captions and acceptable copyright status. Images follow the image use policy. Non-free images or media must satisfy the criteria for inclusion of non-free content and be labeled accordingly. Length. It stays focused on the main topic without going into unnecessary detail and uses summary style where appropriate.	Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information.	No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible.[under discussion]	Cleopatra (as of June 2018)
FL	The article has attained featured list status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured list candidates. More detailed criteria The article meets the featured list criteria: Prose. It features professional standards of writing. Lead. It has an engaging lead that introduces the subject and defines the scope and inclusion criteria. Comprehensiveness. (a) It comprehensively covers the defined scope, providing at least all of the major items and, where practical, a complete set of items; where appropriate, it has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about the items. (b) statements are sourced where they appear, and they provide inline citations if they contain any of the four kinds of material absolutely required to have citations. (c) In length and/or topic, it meets all of the requirements for stand-alone lists; does not violate the content-forking guideline, does not largely duplicate material from another article, and could not reasonably be included as part of a related article. Structure. It is easy to navigate and includes, where helpful, section headings and table sort facilities. Style. It complies with the Manual of Style and its supplementary pages. (a) Visual appeal. It makes suitable use of text layout, formatting, tables, and colour; and a minimal proportion of items are redlinked. (b) Media files. It has images and other media, if appropriate to the topic, that follow Wikipedia's usage policies, with succinct captions. Non-free images and other media satisfy the criteria for the inclusion of non-free content and are labeled accordingly. Stability. It is not the subject of ongoing edit wars and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured list process.	Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items.	No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available.	List of dates predicted for apocalyptic events (as of May 2018)
A	The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been examined by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class. More detailed criteria The article meets the A-Class criteria: Provides a well-written, clear and complete description of the topic, as described in Wikipedia:Article development. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, appropriately structured, and be well referenced by a broad array of reliable sources. It should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. Only minor style issues and other details need to be addressed before submission as a featured article candidate. See the A-Class assessment departments of some of the larger WikiProjects (e.g. WikiProject Military history).	Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting.	Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving. WP:Peer review may help.	Battle of Nam River (as of June 2014)
GA	The article meets all of the good article criteria, and has been examined by one or more impartial reviewers from WP:Good article nominations. More detailed criteria A good article is: Well-written: the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct; and it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. Verifiable with no original research: it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline; reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose); it contains no original research; and it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. Broad in its coverage: it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content; and media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (though not necessarily equalling) the quality of a professional publication.	Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing.	Discovery of the neutron (as of April 2019)
B	The article meets all of the B-Class criteria. It is mostly complete and does not have major problems, but requires some further work to reach good article standards. More detailed criteria The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations. It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited. Any format of inline citation is acceptable: the use of <ref> tags and citation templates such as ((cite web)) is optional. The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. It contains a large proportion of the material necessary for an A-Class article, although some sections may need expansion, and some less important topics may be missing. The article has a defined structure. Content should be organized into groups of related material, including a lead section and all the sections that can reasonably be included in an article of its kind. The article is reasonably well-written. The prose contains no major grammatical errors and flows sensibly, but it does not need to be "brilliant". The Manual of Style does not need to be followed rigorously. The article contains supporting materials where appropriate. Illustrations are encouraged, though not required. Diagrams, an infobox etc. should be included where they are relevant and useful to the content. The article presents its content in an appropriately understandable way. It is written with as broad an audience in mind as possible. The article should not assume unnecessary technical background and technical terms should be explained or avoided where possible.	Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher.	A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the Manual of Style and related style guidelines.	Psychology (as of January 2024)
C	The article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup. More detailed criteria The article cites more than one reliable source and is better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but it fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements, or need editing for clarity, balance, or flow.	Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study.	Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve cleanup problems.	Wing (as of June 2018)
Start	An article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources. More detailed criteria The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas. The article has one or more of the following: A useful picture or graphic Multiple links that help explain or illustrate the topic A subheading that fully treats an element of the topic Multiple subheadings that indicate material that could be added to complete the article	Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more.	Providing references to reliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Also improve the grammar, spelling, writing style and improve the jargon use.	Ball (as of September 2014)
Stub	A very basic description of the topic. Meets none of the Start-Class criteria.	Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are significant.	Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is significant.	Lineage (anthropology) (as of December 2014)
List	Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list or set index article, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area.	There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader.	Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized.	List of literary movements

Requesting an assessment

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, you can request an assessment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Netherlands.

The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.

February 19, 2024

Reassessed

• Trix Terwindt (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
• Şenay Özdemir (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)

Assessed

• 2007 Dutch Open Grand Prix (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• A12 blockade (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
• Bangladesh–Netherlands relations (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Bodo Sperling (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Willem van Schendel (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)

Removed

• Category:Dutch people of Arab descent (talk) removed.

February 18, 2024

Renamed

• Ida Caroline Eugenie Peelen renamed to Ida Peelen.

Reassessed

• Mariska Majoor (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from C-Class to B-Class. (rev · t)
• Roman Empire (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from GA-Class to B-Class. (rev · t)
• Stephen Fry: Willem & Frieda – Defying the Nazis (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from C-Class to B-Class. (rev · t)

Assessed

• 2016 European Open Water Championships (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Catharina Ziekenhuis (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Henk Wolda (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Ida Peelen (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Marloes Frieswijk (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Museums in the Netherlands by populated place (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• SS Margariti (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t)
• Santeon (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• St Hildegard's Church, Rotterdam (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Trix Terwindt (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)

Removed

• Category:Establishments in Danish India by year (talk) removed.
• Category:Museums in the Netherlands by city (talk) removed.

February 17, 2024

Renamed

• List of monarchs of Frisia renamed to List of rulers of Frisia.

Reassessed

• Ida Caroline Eugenie Peelen (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Wim Landman (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)

Assessed

• Diving at the 2012 European Aquatics Championships – Men's 10 m platform (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Education in the Netherlands by populated place (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Former defence companies of the Netherlands (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Gangsta rap albums by Dutch artists (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• List of rulers of Frisia (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as List-Class. (rev · t)
• Maikel Boon (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Mariska Majoor (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t)
• Mike Mago (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Rap rock albums by Dutch artists (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Schools in the Netherlands by populated place (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Trap music albums by Dutch artists (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Young Hearts (2024 film) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)

Removed

• Category:Education in the Netherlands by city or town (talk) removed.
• Category:Schools in the Netherlands by city (talk) removed.

February 16, 2024

Renamed

• Siege of Geertruidenberg (1351-1352) renamed to Siege of Geertruidenberg (1351–1352).

Reassessed

• Action at Tamanana, 9 September 1645 (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Redirect-Class. (rev · t)
• HIsarna ironmaking process (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
• Middle Class Party (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
• Netherlands at the 2024 Winter Youth Olympics (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
• New Amsterdam's windmills (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Opinion polling for the 2023 Dutch provincial elections (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to List-Class. (rev · t)
• Pim Walenkamp (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
• Ravesteyn (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
• Robbert Lievense (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)

Assessed

• Branco van den Boomen (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Siege of Geertruidenberg (1351–1352) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as B-Class. (rev · t)
• SnappCar (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Zoomin.TV (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)

Removed

• Category:Cultural depictions of Dutch kings (talk) removed.

February 15, 2024

Renamed

• Cornelis Rudolphus Theodorus Krayenhoff renamed to Cornelis Krayenhoff.
• VOKO-Irodion renamed to VOKO.

Reassessed

• A. A. van Ruler (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Anantara Grand Hotel Krasnapolsky Amsterdam (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Geuzen (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
• Water Natuurlijk (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)

Assessed

• Amber Kraak (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Amsterdam Basketball coaches (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Amsterdam Basketball players (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Belgian expatriate basketball people in the Netherlands (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Cornelis Krayenhoff (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Defunct basketball teams in the Netherlands (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Dutch Basketball League (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Dutch Basketball League awards (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Dutch Basketball League coaches (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Dutch Basketball League players (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Dutch Basketball League playoffs (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Dutch Basketball League seasons (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Dutch Basketball League seasons by club (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Dutch Basketball League statistical leaders (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Dutch Basketball League teams (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Dutch Basketball League transactions (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Dutch Basketball Supercup (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Dutch expatriate basketball people in Croatia (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Dutch expatriate basketball people in Cyprus (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Dutch expatriate basketball people in Georgia (country) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Dutch expatriate basketball people in Germany (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Dutch expatriate basketball people in Iran (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Dutch expatriate basketball people in Slovakia (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Dutch expatriate basketball people in Turkey (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Dutch expatriate basketball people in Ukraine (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Dutch expatriate basketball people in the Czech Republic (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Dutch female wheelchair basketball players (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Dutch male wheelchair basketball players (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Former Dutch Basketball League teams (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Hope Flying Dutch women's basketball (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Hope Flying Dutch women's basketball coaches (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Hope Flying Dutchmen and Flying Dutch basketball (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:International youth basketball competitions hosted by the Netherlands (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Landforms of the Netherlands Antilles (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Roué Verveer (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• VOKO (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)

February 14, 2024

Renamed

• Grand Hotel Krasnapolsky renamed to Anantara Grand Hotel Krasnapolsky Amsterdam.

Reassessed

• Cornelis Rudolphus Theodorus Krayenhoff (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
• Jacobus Van Dijk (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
• MV Lady Odiel (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)

Assessed

• A. A. van Ruler (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
• Anantara Grand Hotel Krasnapolsky Amsterdam (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Capture of Fort Casimir (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Christian education in the Netherlands (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• Fox and Hare Save the Forest (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Template:Modern Dutch submarines (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Template-Class. (rev · t)
• Winkel van Sinkel (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t)
• Yvonne Paul (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t)

Removed

• Category:Cathedrals in the Dutch Caribbean (talk) removed.

February 13, 2024

Renamed

• Braat Overvalwagen renamed to Overvalwagen.
• Template:Cycling data JVD renamed to Template:Cycling data VLD.
• Radbod (Frisia) renamed to Radbod of Frisia.

Reassessed

• Hubert Hugo (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Oussama Idrissi (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Ubuntu Connected Front (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)

Assessed

• Template:Cycling data VLD (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Template-Class. (rev · t)
• De Gelderlander (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Category:Dutch military-related lists (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t)
• MV Lady Odiel (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t)
• Netherlands Antilles at the 2011 World Aquatics Championships (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Netherlands Antilles at the 2013 World Aquatics Championships (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Netherlands at the 2011 World Aquatics Championships (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Netherlands at the 2017 World Aquatics Championships (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Netherlands at the 2022 World Aquatics Championships (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Netherlands at the 2023 World Aquatics Championships (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Overvalwagen (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Radbod of Frisia (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Revolusi (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• SS West Arvada (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t)
• Star Pubs & Bars (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Synchronised swimming at the 2012 European Aquatics Championships – Combination routine (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Synchronised swimming at the 2012 European Aquatics Championships – Duet routine (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Synchronised swimming at the 2012 European Aquatics Championships – Solo routine (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Synchronised swimming at the 2012 European Aquatics Championships – Team routine (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Synchronised swimming at the 2014 European Aquatics Championships – Combination routine (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Synchronised swimming at the 2014 European Aquatics Championships – Duet routine (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Synchronised swimming at the 2014 European Aquatics Championships – Solo routine (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Synchronised swimming at the 2014 European Aquatics Championships – Team routine (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Tristan van Gilst (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t)

Removed

• Category:Roman Catholic cathedrals in the Dutch Caribbean (talk) removed.