Quality: FA-Class | A Class | GA-Class | B-Class | C-Class | Start-Class | Stub Class | Unassessed Importance: Top | High | Mid | Low | Unknown
Welcome to the assessment department of WikiProject Odisha! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's Odisha articles. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognising excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.
The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the ((WP Odisha)) project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Odisha articles by quality and Category:Odisha articles by importance, which serve as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.
If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.
If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below. If you are interested in more extensive comments on an article, please use the peer review department instead. Completed requests are usually placed in the archive .
Please place new requests in the format - -- #[[article name]] --~~~~. New requests may please be added at the bottom of the list. Place requests from here onwards:
An article's assessment is generated from the class and importance parameters in the ((WP Odisha)) project banner on its talk page (see the project banner instructions for more details on the exact syntax):
The following values may be used for the class parameter:
Articles for which a valid class is not provided are listed in Category:Unassessed-Class Odisha articles. The class should be assigned according to the quality scale below.
The following values may be used for the importance parameter:
The parameter is not used if an article's class is set to NA, and may be omitted in those cases. The importance should be assigned according to the importance scale below.
Please note that the WikiProject Odisha Assessment Department is in the process of updating the grading scheme, so changes may occur to the criteria and examples - the assessment department apologizes for an inconvenience caused, and endeavours to complete this task as soon as possible. Upon completion of updating, the main member of the assessment department will remove this notice.
Wikipedia:WikiProject Odisha/Grading scheme
The criteria used for rating article importance are not meant to be an absolute or canonical view of how significant the topic is. Rather, they attempt to gauge the probability of the average reader of Wikipedia needing to look up the topic (and thus the immediate need to have a suitably well-written article on it). Thus, subjects with greater popular notability may be rated higher than topics which are arguably more "important" but which are of interest primarily to students of Odisha.
Note that general notability need not be from the perspective of editor demographics; generally notable topics should be rated similarly regardless of the country or region in which they hold said notability. Thus, topics which may seem obscure to a Western audience—but which are of high notability in other places—should still be highly rated.
Status | Template | Meaning of Status |
---|---|---|
Top | ((Top-Class)) | This article is of the utmost importance to this project, as it forms the basis of all information. |
High | ((High-Class)) | This article is fairly important to this project, as it covers a general area of knowledge. |
Mid | ((Mid-Class)) | This article is relatively important to this project, as it fills in some more specific knowledge of certain areas. |
Low | ((Low-Class)) | This article is of little importance to this project, but it covers a highly specific area of knowledge or an obscure piece of trivia. |
None | None | This article is of unknown importance to this project. It remains to be analyzed. |
The list of members below make up the main members of the WikiProject Odisha Assessment team. Members of the team who are bolded (below) are currently active - they are most likely to assess articles, so please direct any enquiries regarding assessment or the assessment department towards them.
If you would like to join the assessment team, please add your name below.
Odisha articles by quality and importance | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Quality | Importance | ||||||
Top | High | Mid | Low | NA | ??? | Total | |
GA | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5 | |||
B | 9 | 16 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 45 | |
C | 15 | 29 | 45 | 44 | 32 | 165 | |
Start | 13 | 68 | 340 | 388 | 118 | 927 | |
Stub | 4 | 46 | 165 | 991 | 317 | 1,523 | |
List | 3 | 4 | 84 | 13 | 8 | 112 | |
Category | 1 | 2 | 507 | 510 | |||
Disambig | 1 | 1 | |||||
File | 3 | 3 | |||||
Redirect | 3 | 13 | 58 | 33 | 107 | ||
Template | 2 | 72 | 74 | ||||
NA | 2 | 2 | |||||
Other | 9 | 9 | |||||
Assessed | 45 | 168 | 657 | 1,506 | 626 | 481 | 3,483 |
Unassessed | 2 | 33 | 35 | ||||
Total | 45 | 168 | 657 | 1,508 | 626 | 514 | 3,518 |
WikiWork factors (?) | ω = 14,589 | Ω = 5.47 |
To assess an article, paste one of the following onto the article's talk page.
Quality
Importance
The full log of assessment changes for the past thirty days is available here. Unfortunately, due to its extreme size, it cannot be transcluded directly.
Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Protected areas of Odisha articles by quality statistics |