WikiProject on Tennis
Main pages
Project Main Page	talk
Article Guidelines	talk
Assessment Department	talk
Cleanup Department	talk
Templates and Categories	talk
Grand Slam Project	talk
Davis Cup/Fed Cup Project	talk
Tournament Task Force	talk
Tennis Portal	talk

Welcome to the Assessment Department of the Tennis WikiProject. This department was made to assess and grade the quality and importance of articles related to tennis. The main purpose is to recognise excellent articles and to identify articles that might need more work or could be improved.

How can I get a tennis article rated?

Please list it in the section for assessment requests at the bottom of this page.

Who can assess tennis articles?

Any member of the Tennis WikiProject is free to add or change the rating of an article. Please note that the GA and FA classes need to be assessed by the community, and need consensus for promotion.

Someone put a ((WikiProject Tennis)) template on an article, but it's not a Tennis-related article. What should I do?

Feel free to remove the template, if it is improperly placed.

How do I assess a tennis article?

Place a ((WikiProject Tennis)) template on the article's Talk page using this tag: ((WikiProject Tennis|class=|importance=))

An example based on class=start, importance=mid:

Tennis NA‑class Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tennis, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that relate to tennis on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TennisWikipedia:WikiProject TennisTemplate:WikiProject Tennistennis articles NA This article has been rated as NA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Tennis To-do: edit history watch purge Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Cleanup : Take an item off the Cleanup listing Copyedit : Roger Federer, Leander Paes, Rafael Nadal, Justine Henin – to be used as examples for ideal page structures Expand : Grab a Start article and expand it, or peruse the List of articles. Photo : Add photos to Tennis or Tennis people articles Stubs : Bring a Stub up to our standards. Other : *Sign up as a member of the project. Tag more articles with our standard project template. Help with the creation of yearly main articles and drawsheets for every Open Era ATP and WTA tournament.

Tennis articles by quality and importance
Quality	Importance
	Top	High	Mid	Low	NA	???	Total
FA		3	1	2			6
FL		5	1				6
GA		18	8	17			43
B	6	63	35	55		2	161
C	14	138	199	404		18	773
Start	54	607	2,161	8,696		130	11,648
Stub	1	122	1,222	27,419		316	29,080
List	9	197	108	543	4	39	900
Category	2		2	8	9,170		9,182
Disambig					115		115
File					354		354
Portal					160		160
Project					41		41
Template	1	1	2	5	1,246		1,255
NA	2	17	46	278	327		670
Other				1	22		23
Assessed	89	1,171	3,785	37,428	11,439	505	54,417
Unassessed				11	2	2,073	2,086
Total	89	1,171	3,785	37,439	11,441	2,578	56,503
WikiWork factors (?)		ω = 236,351			Ω = 5.67

Update table: update project data

The assessment of an article is made with the class and importance perimeters, with the ((WikiProject Tennis)) banner.

Quality Scale

Class	Criteria	Reader's experience	Editing suggestions	Example
FA	The article has attained featured article status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured article candidates. More detailed criteria The article meets the featured article criteria: A featured article exemplifies Wikipedia's very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting the policies regarding content for all Wikipedia articles, it has the following attributes. It is: well-written: its prose is engaging and of a professional standard; comprehensive: it neglects no major facts or details and places the subject in context; well-researched: it is a thorough and representative survey of the relevant literature; claims are verifiable against high-quality reliable sources and are supported by inline citations where appropriate; neutral: it presents views fairly and without bias; stable: it is not subject to ongoing edit wars and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured article process; and compliant with Wikipedia's copyright policy and free of plagiarism or too-close paraphrasing. It follows the style guidelines, including the provision of: a lead: a concise lead section that summarizes the topic and prepares the reader for the detail in the subsequent sections; appropriate structure: a substantial but not overwhelming system of hierarchical section headings; and consistent citations: where required by criterion 1c, consistently formatted inline citations using footnotes—see citing sources for suggestions on formatting references. Citation templates are not required. Media. It has images and other media, where appropriate, with succinct captions and acceptable copyright status. Images follow the image use policy. Non-free images or media must satisfy the criteria for inclusion of non-free content and be labeled accordingly. Length. It stays focused on the main topic without going into unnecessary detail and uses summary style where appropriate.	Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information.	No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible.[under discussion]	Kim Clijsters, Milos Raonic
FL	The article has attained featured list status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured list candidates. More detailed criteria The article meets the featured list criteria: Prose. It features professional standards of writing. Lead. It has an engaging lead that introduces the subject and defines the scope and inclusion criteria. Comprehensiveness. (a) It comprehensively covers the defined scope, providing at least all of the major items and, where practical, a complete set of items; where appropriate, it has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about the items. (b) statements are sourced where they appear, and they provide inline citations if they contain any of the four kinds of material absolutely required to have citations. (c) In length and/or topic, it meets all of the requirements for stand-alone lists; does not violate the content-forking guideline, does not largely duplicate material from another article, and could not reasonably be included as part of a related article. Structure. It is easy to navigate and includes, where helpful, section headings and table sort facilities. Style. It complies with the Manual of Style and its supplementary pages. (a) Visual appeal. It makes suitable use of text layout, formatting, tables, and colour; and a minimal proportion of items are redlinked. (b) Media files. It has images and other media, if appropriate to the topic, that follow Wikipedia's usage policies, with succinct captions. Non-free images and other media satisfy the criteria for the inclusion of non-free content and are labeled accordingly. Stability. It is not the subject of ongoing edit wars and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured list process.	Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items.	No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available.	List of Davis Cup champions
A	The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been examined by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class. More detailed criteria The article meets the A-Class criteria: Provides a well-written, clear and complete description of the topic, as described in Wikipedia:Article development. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, appropriately structured, and be well referenced by a broad array of reliable sources. It should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. Only minor style issues and other details need to be addressed before submission as a featured article candidate. See the A-Class assessment departments of some of the larger WikiProjects (e.g. WikiProject Military history).	Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting.	Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving. WP:Peer review may help.	Battle of Nam River (as of June 2014)
GA	The article meets all of the good article criteria, and has been examined by one or more impartial reviewers from WP:Good article nominations. More detailed criteria A good article is: Well-written: the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct; and it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. Verifiable with no original research: it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline; reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose); it contains no original research; and it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. Broad in its coverage: it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content; and media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (though not necessarily equalling) the quality of a professional publication.	Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing.	Roger Federer, Ashleigh Barty
B	The article meets all of the B-Class criteria. It is mostly complete and does not have major problems, but requires some further work to reach good article standards. More detailed criteria The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations. It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited. Any format of inline citation is acceptable: the use of <ref> tags and citation templates such as ((cite web)) is optional. The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. It contains a large proportion of the material necessary for an A-Class article, although some sections may need expansion, and some less important topics may be missing. The article has a defined structure. Content should be organized into groups of related material, including a lead section and all the sections that can reasonably be included in an article of its kind. The article is reasonably well-written. The prose contains no major grammatical errors and flows sensibly, but it does not need to be "brilliant". The Manual of Style does not need to be followed rigorously. The article contains supporting materials where appropriate. Illustrations are encouraged, though not required. Diagrams, an infobox etc. should be included where they are relevant and useful to the content. The article presents its content in an appropriately understandable way. It is written with as broad an audience in mind as possible. The article should not assume unnecessary technical background and technical terms should be explained or avoided where possible.	Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher.	A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the Manual of Style and related style guidelines.	Tennis, Grand Slam (tennis)
C	The article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup. More detailed criteria The article cites more than one reliable source and is better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but it fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements, or need editing for clarity, balance, or flow.	Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study.	Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve cleanup problems.	International Tennis Federation
Start	An article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources. More detailed criteria The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas. The article has one or more of the following: A useful picture or graphic Multiple links that help explain or illustrate the topic A subheading that fully treats an element of the topic Multiple subheadings that indicate material that could be added to complete the article	Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more.	Providing references to reliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Also improve the grammar, spelling, writing style and improve the jargon use.	2021 Wimbledon Championships
Stub	A very basic description of the topic. Meets none of the Start-Class criteria.	Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are significant.	Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is significant.	John Austin (tennis)
List	Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list or set index article, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area.	There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader.	Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized.	Glossary of tennis terms

Importance Scale

Add your request here (under the appropriate year)

2022

• Nick Kyrgios – Rated C-class, Low-importance, would you please reassess the article in light of my edits, thanks! Anewyorkercomic (talk) 09:34, 7 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

2021

2018

• Hengqin International Tennis Center. New article. Scolaire (talk) 12:18, 5 November 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

2016

• 2015 Austin Aces season - Rated Start-class, Low-importance Taxman1913 (talk) 02:50, 12 May 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

2015

• Belarus Fed Cup team - Rated Stub-Class, Low-importance Hermionedidallthework (talk) 03:16, 20 September 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

   Done - now C-class. Mjquinn_id (talk) 21:34, 26 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

2014

• Dominika Cibulková - Rated C-class, Mid-importance 80.162.1.188 (talk) 22:19, 6 June 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

   Done - rated as suggested. Mjquinn_id (talk) 21:36, 26 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

2011

June

• Hi can someone check the following article Grand Prix Tennis Championship Series 1970-1989 and rate it as per the quality scale very much appreciated.--Navops47 (talk) 17:20, 9 June 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

2010

• Not sure if Melbourne Cricket Club should be should be part of WikiProject Tennis, but it is at the moment, and it doesn't have a rating so could someone either rate it or remove it from this project --Jenks24 (talk) 15:01, 16 May 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

   Done - reviewed and removed. Mjquinn_id (talk) 21:32, 26 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

September

• Could someone look at and rate/rerate the following articles as I've done work to some, some I feel are rated too low for what they are e.g. should be starts not stubs and found some which are blank cause I've just stuck the tag on it. The following should be looked at : AEGON Trophy, Miles Maclagan, Boycott of BNP Paribas Open by Venus and Serena Williams, Philipp Kohlschreiber, 2010 Davis Cup World Group, ATP Grand slams & Masters Singles champions, Andy Murray, Novak Djokovic career statistics, Andy Murray career statistics, Djokovic–Federer rivalry, Djokovic–Nadal rivalry, Federer–Hewitt rivalry, for starters. Thanks KnowIG (talk) 21:25, 17 September 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

2009

June

• Hi ... can someone not involved with the editing of his article pls rate importance of he Dudi Sela article? He just played through the 4th round at Wimbledon, and his rating increased to 30. Also played for Israel in Davis Cup against Russia. He is not yet rated for importance for tennis. Also, I believe that the article is much better than the old C rating at this point. Tx.--Epeefleche (talk) 02:45, 1 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Done - currently B-class. Mjquinn_id (talk) 21:15, 26 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

May

• Anne Keothavong, Katie O'Brien, Melanie South, Elena Baltacha, Georgie Stoop, Emily Webley-Smith, Naomi Cavaday, Naomi Broady, Anna Smith, Tara Moore - I completely understand that a few of these articles may not be of high importance but nevertheless I would appreciate suggestions on how to improve their quality.\

 Done - most are C, couple still Start. Mjquinn_id (talk) 21:15, 26 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• I rated Steve Denton as a high-importance article. He won the 1982 U.S. Open doubles title, and I assumed that the importance assessments are based on doubles as well as singles titles. He also held the world record for fastest serve for a long time. I feel as though this qualifies him for high importance, but was hoping to get a second opinion.

 Done - currently C-class. Mjquinn_id (talk) 21:15, 26 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

April

• AAMI Classic - I've been working on this in March, and while the subject is not extremely important, I think the article is worth at least a C-class, or a B-class tag.

 Done - currently C-class. Mjquinn_id (talk) 21:15, 26 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Pablo Cuevas - Article has been expanded. I set in discussion page the article as Start and Mid, but I wonder if it should be High instead of Mid (Roland Garros winner). --Scuac (talk) 14:51, 2 April 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Done - currently B-class. Mjquinn_id (talk) 21:15, 26 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Added tag to Andy Murray page. Set quality as B and importance as high. It's well written and he is obviously a highly important figure in men's tennis.

 Done - Currently, GA article. Mjquinn_id (talk) 21:15, 26 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Wayne Odesnik - Article has been expanded. --Ethelh (talk) 23:37, 12 April 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Done - currently B-class. Mjquinn_id (talk) 21:15, 26 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

March

• Williams Sisters rivalry - Article has been expanded from stubby beginning, and I was hoping to get feedback from the Tennis community. Alonsornunez (talk) 16:48, 10 March 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Done - Currently C-Class. Mjquinn_id (talk) 20:23, 26 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Aleksandra Wozniak - Article has been expanded from stub beginning.--Ethelh (talk) 22:02, 25 March 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

   Done - Currently C-Class. Mjquinn_id (talk) 20:22, 26 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

2008

November

• Jo-Wilfried Tsonga should have Mid importance now. 94.189.204.147 (talk) 19:45, 11 November 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Done - it does. Mjquinn_id (talk) 20:19, 26 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

July

• 2008 Wimbledon Championships, most recent Grand Slam tournament. Yohan euan o4 (talk) 19:00, 16 July 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Done Mjquinn_id (talk) 20:21, 26 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

June

• Rafael Osuna Spent some time improving this article, and I think it's come a long way, though it needs someone to sift through back issues of Sports Illustrated (et al.) and add a dozen more refs. Goldenband (talk) 18:14, 5 June 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Done - currently C-Class Mjquinn_id (talk) 20:19, 26 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.

Unexpected changes, such as downgrading an article, or raising it more than two assessment classes at once, are shown in bold.

February 21, 2024

Renamed

• Tuks International renamed to Wiphold International.

Reassessed

• Zhao Yi-Jing (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Low-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t)

Assessed

• 1988 New South Wales Open – Men's singles (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
• Wiphold International (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)

February 20, 2024

Renamed

• Astana Open renamed to Almaty Open.

Reassessed

• 2021 ATP Finals – Singles (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
• 2023 Montevideo Open – Singles (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
• 2024 Davis Cup (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)

Assessed

• Almaty Open (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
• Gijón Open (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
• Template:Jannik Sinner (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Template-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Kinneret Wallach (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)

Removed

• File:Ronald Agenor.jpg (talk) removed.

February 19, 2024

Renamed

• 1955 NCAA Tennis Championships renamed to 1955 NCAA tennis championships.
• 1956 NCAA Tennis Championships renamed to 1956 NCAA tennis championships.

Reassessed

• Pierre Lebréton (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Low-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t)

Assessed

• 1955 NCAA tennis championships (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
• 1956 NCAA tennis championships (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
• 2023 ACT Clay Court International 1 (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
• 2023 ACT Clay Court International 2 (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
• 2023 Montevideo Open – Singles (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
• 2024 Davis Cup (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
• Draft:2024 Iga Świątek tennis season (talk) assessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• David Mustard (tennis) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)

Removed

• David Mustard (talk) removed.

February 18, 2024

Renamed

• 2023 Sunderland Pro Series I – Women's singles renamed to 2023 Sunderland Pro Series – Women's singles.
• Template:Men's Tennis Player Seasons: 2020–present renamed to Template:Men's Singles Tennis Player Seasons: 2020–present.

Reassessed

• 2024 Rohan Bopanna tennis season (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from List-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t)

Assessed

• 2023 Sunderland Pro Series – Women's singles (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
• 2024 Dubai Tennis Championships – Women's singles (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
• Glenn Fraser (American football) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
• Template:Men's Singles Tennis Player Seasons: 2020–present (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Template-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)

February 17, 2024

Reassessed

• Atlanta Open (tennis) (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from List-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Ofri Lankri (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Tennis Premier League (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)

Assessed

• 2024 ATX Open (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
• 2024 Abierto Mexicano Telcel (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
• 2024 Chile Open (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
• 2024 Pune Challenger (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
• 2024 Pune Challenger – Doubles (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
• 2024 Pune Challenger – Singles (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
• 2024 San Diego Open (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
• 2024 Tenerife Challenger II (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
• 2024 Tenerife Challenger II – Doubles (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
• 2024 Tenerife Challenger II – Singles (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
• 2024 Teréga Open Pau–Pyrénées (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
• 2024 Teréga Open Pau–Pyrénées – Doubles (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
• 2024 Teréga Open Pau–Pyrénées – Singles (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
• Harry Good (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
• Olga Barbušová (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)

February 16, 2024

Reassessed

• Anzhelika Isaeva (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Barbara Schett career statistics (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to List-Class. (rev · t)
• Frederick Dorville Jackson (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Hira-Lal Soni (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
• John Galbraith Horn (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)

Assessed

• Category:Tennis players from Copenhagen (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)

February 15, 2024

Reassessed

• All-Jamaica Tennis Championships (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
• Brenda Fruhvirtová (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
• Rohan Bopanna (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from C-Class to B-Class. (rev · t)

Assessed

• Category:Defunct tennis tournaments in Jamaica (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
• Hannah Klugman (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
• Trinidad International (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)