This is a project guideline for the structure of Wikipedia articles about UK Waterways. Discuss it at WikiProject UK Waterways.

The order of sections is optional, although it is strongly recommended that articles conform to the basic structure of a lead followed by history, decline (where applicable), today/restoration (where applicable), route, as those sections contain much of the basic information about any waterway. Beyond that, editors are advised to come to a consensus that works best for the waterway in question. References are required for every article.

While this is just a guideline, it does provide a basic framework for a UK waterway article, as well as useful tips to help in bringing an article up to good article or featured article status. Some articles have achieved GA status and adhere loosely to these guidelines.

Please ensure that all changes to this page are discussed on the talk page and reflect consensus.

In the United Kingdom, the meaning of "waterway" can be ambiguous. This project covers waterways which are, or have been, used for navigation. It does not cover those built and used solely for drainage or water transfer.

The scope of the UK Waterways project is stated as: canals, navigable rivers and related features (locks, reservoirs, bridges, aqueducts, boats, people, etc.) located within the United Kingdom.

Article scope[edit]

Navigable rivers may end up having two articles describing the river. The one covered by this project would be the one describing the river as a navigation, and would be titled River xxxx Navigation, or similar based on the company name. A second article may be written about the natural river and might include content about the whole catchment area, tributaries, ecology etc.

Where navigations have changed ownership or merged, it may be appropriate in complex cases to have multiple articles describing the history of them. One article, using the current name, should describe the waterway as it stands today, and outline the history. Other articles may describe the history of the component parts using the historical names, but only up the point at which the name change occurs. A good candidate for changing under this guideline would be Ellesmere Canal.

Article structure example for a U.K. waterway[edit]


NOTE: "Infobox" and "Lead" are not headings in their own right, and should not be included on articles as such. The order of sections is also optional, and sections may be moved around to a different order based on the needs of their settlement. Editors are strongly encouraged, however, to at least begin with the lead, followed by history, decline (where applicable), today/restoration (where applicable), route. References are a requirement of any article. Further, alternative headings are listed under the "Optional headings" section below. Section titles should generally not start with the word "The" (see WP:HEAD).


Infobox

There are no standardised infoboxes for UK waterways.

Lead

Lead (see also WP:LEAD): Include the following

History

History: You may wish to include the following

Decline (where appropriate)

Decline: You may wish to include the following

Today/Restoration (where applicable)

Today/Restoration: You may wish to include the following

Route

See also

See also (this heading is not mandatory): Include the following:

References

NOTE: Reference sections may follow a number of styles, including separate "Footnote" and "Further reading" sections, please refer to WP:REF for more information.

External links

External links should be added only rarely, and in accordance with the guidelines found in WP:EL. Consequently, this section should only rarely be found in most articles. In particular, the use of links as described in WP:SPAM should always be avoided.

If any links are deemed appropriate for this section, they should always be accompanied by an appropriate description of (a) what they are, (b) their justification, and (c) the date on which they were added in the form "Accessed: 07 July, 2007" (WP:EL#External links section gives some more information about this.)

External links used as a form of verification for facts found in the text of the article should be treated as normal references, e.g., cited by enclosing them in <ref>...</ref> tags and conforming to the style of web-based references, which also includes a "Retrieval date" component. They should not be added to this section (see WP:EL#References and citation.) Wikipedia:Citation templates gives useful information about what should be entered and the order in which the separate components of a web-citation should appear.

Optional headings[edit]

Some waterway's entries may be dominated so much by a specific landmark, person or movement (such as a feature or event) that it may require its own section (rather than just a sub-section). Where this applicable, try to insert it beneath the heading to which it is most related.


Dos and Don'ts[edit]

Grammar and layout checklist[edit]