EdJohnston's PPI Assessment Page

EdJohnston - Wikipedia expert

Assessment 1, part 1

The purpose of this evaluation in not to gauge variability in article quality, but to look at the metric itself. How consistent is this assessment tool? and Is there a difference in scores between subject area expert assessment and Wikipedian article assessment?

Permanent residence (United States) (1 July 2010)

[edit]

Comprehensiveness 6/10
Sourcing 4/6
Neutrality 3/3
Readability 2/3
Illustrations 2/2
Formatting 2/2
Total 19/26

Left some review comments at Talk:Permanent residence (United States)#My assessment

Great Society (1 July 2010)

[edit]

Comprehensiveness = 6/10
Sourcing = 4/6
Neutrality =1/3
Readability = 3/3
Illustrations = 1/2
Formatting = 2/2
Total = 17/26

Left detailed comments at Talk:Great Society#Review comments.

Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 (1 July 2010)

[edit]

Comprehensiveness = 5/10
Sourcing = 3/6
Neutrality = 2/3
Readability =2/3
Illustrations =1/2
Formatting =2/2

Total = 15/26

Drug policy of the United States (1 July 2010)

[edit]

Comprehensiveness = 3/10
Sourcing = 2/6
Neutrality = 2/3
Readability = 1/3
Illustrations = 0/2
Formatting =2/2
Total = 10/26

Missouri Plan (1 July 2010)

[edit]

Comprehensiveness = 6/10
Sourcing = 4/6
Neutrality = 2/3
Readability = 2/3
Illustrations = 0/2
Formatting = 2/2
Total = 16/26

State school (1 July 2010)

[edit]

Comprehensiveness = 7/10
Sourcing = 4/6
Neutrality = 2/3
Readability = 2/3
Illustrations = 0/2
Formatting = 1/2
Total = 16/26

Assessment 1, Part 2

[edit]

Assessment request 2, please use article version from 1 October 2010. There are a couple of rereviews, hopefully those will go fast for you. This set will tie up the first assessment, which tests the quantitative metric and compares Wikipedian assessment to expert assessment.