This is the talk page, not the actual articles for deletion page. Please direct your !votes to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kyle Kulinski (4th nomination) instead of the talk page. |
The result of the last AFD in December was "no consensus as near as possible to DEL" after a bad case of SPA + IP comments unfamiliar with the concept of notability, claiming YT subscribers as "good enough" (not). But bimonthly semi-protected AFDs are not better, nobody bothered to fix obvious issues, e.g., a Politicon 2018 photo + profile suggest that he actually was present in some capacity, and I only added 2019. He appeared almost weekly as (quote) friend of the show (unquote) on Rising recently, so far the BLP has this only as once (credits), and the nominator apparently invented a new BEFORE cocktail based on IDONTLIKEIT for the 4th AFD, the old 2017 AFDs don't cover 2018–2020 events. –84.46.52.79 (talk) 02:35, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
@Trackinfo: Thanks for info, I've fixed (pending review) two simple issues, but I'm not going to check the lost WaPo source for this or any other BLP about a guy, this would require disabling JavaScript on WayBack. JFTR, the nominator follows their principles on all sides, not only on "progressive" BLPs, e.g., The Gateway Pundit + Saagar Enjeti, and on Kim Iversen I just reset the BLP to a state I don't exactly like based on Talk:Jimmy Dore#Bellingcat sourced content- –84.46.53.84 (talk) 23:08, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
The United Nations has confirmed that the Syrian government was responsible for the attack.based on the Bellingcat as a source, even though I provided the source [1] directly from the United Nations that contradicts that statement. Same editor started sanitizing [2] and reversing the content of what was Media bias against Bernie Sanders.
@Ryk72 and RoySmith: If we all like THREE, how about moving it from the user to the project namespace, and cite or wikilink it in some guideline, e.g., BLP1PROD, for status "informative"/"supplemental" instead of essay? I counted two (1st RealClearPolitics + Good.is). The Vice source is also okay, but mentions Kulinski only in passing. For some progress with ((Better source|date=January 2020))
I've suggested (pending review) the official YouTube PoV about their "four rs of responsibility raise and reduce" efforts, i.e., raise CNN+Fox etc., the missing 4th R is "reliable".
Politicon 2018 is still missing, and I haven't the faintest how relevant it is (for a Social in the City 2018 panelist I'd bet on "not good enough" if not covered in RS). –84.46.53.165 (talk) 07:10, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Essays ... may be created and edited without overall community oversight.I'm not planning to do that, but I did want to clear up the misconception. Of course, if anybody wants to link to it, that's perfectly fine. -- RoySmith (talk) 23:17, 3 February 2020 (UTC)