Section for stuff on meta-wiki

We've been including a lot of discussions on Meta-wiki recently, which I think has been a great development. I'm wondering if it might be helpful to section the CENT template to distinguish discussions at meta-wiki and those locally. Even something as simple as a horizontal rule with local discussions above and meta discussions below. I think it would help draw more attention and lead to more meta discussions getting advertised. Thoughts? Wug·a·po·des 04:24, 15 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

+1 horizontal rule Levivich 18:29, 21 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I too support the idea. CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {CX}) 06:59, 1 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I have to admit I don't like it. Either we're saying something is work Enwiki editors' time, whether here or on meta, or it's not. I think adding the extra line clutters a box that is intentionally kept "slim". Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 22:43, 2 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Just noting I've taken out the On Meta-Wiki. I left the horizontal rule for now, though thinking about it the purpose may not be obvious unless someone looks at this thread. Xeno (WMF) (talk) 02:06, 3 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I don't think that's a huge problem. The critical info is "here's a discussion you might want to join". Whether you understand the hrule or not, that's still very clear and the hrule is easily ignored. For those who do know it's useful subcategorization to help prioritize discussions, and for those who would like to know it's easily discovered. Click link above line, go to enWiki. Click link below line, go to meta. Simple enough pattern to pick up on, and no critical information is lost if you don't. Wug·a·po·des 02:51, 3 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I think the simple line works better than the "on meta-wiki" phraseology and we should add instructions in the template documentation, and probably as comments on the template itself, to help users place their links in the correct place. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 14:58, 6 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

English Wikipedia's participation in the Board election is down a good amount, as a percentage of the overall electorate. I'm wondering if it has anything to do with this change. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 18:02, 2 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Current transclusion

@Xeno (WMF) and Wugapodes: The current link that both of you edited currently leads to a nonexistent page at :meta. Happy Editing--IAmChaos 01:41, 3 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

IAmChaos: Thank you! I fixed that link. Xeno (WMF) (talk) 02:06, 3 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 11 June 2022

Please add a link to Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#RFC: Shut down Wikipedia:Administrative action review 2409:4071:D9A:88D6:0:0:4348:A50A (talk) 13:18, 11 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Not done: RFC already closed as non-neutral. CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {CX}) 14:36, 11 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]