User:Protonk
run at Wed Oct 15 00:44:35 2008 GMT
Category talk: 7
Category: 9
Image talk: 3
Image: 16
Mainspace 2846
MediaWiki talk: 7
Talk: 1025
Template talk: 23
Template: 56
User talk: 1203
User: 223
Wikipedia talk: 391
Wikipedia: 2526
avg edits per page 2.50
earliest 04:21, 17 April 2008
number of unique pages 3331
total 8335
2008/4 619
2008/5 166
2008/6 462
2008/7 2049
2008/8 2750
2008/9 1802
2008/10 487
Mainspace
147 Mathematical economics
90 Warhammer 40,000
51 John Emilius Fauquier
43 Los Angeles class submarine
31 Richard A. Houghten
31 Cheshire Cat in popular culture
27 Bloody Sunday (1969)
27 James Wesley Rawles
27 Alvin E. Roth
25 Galaxy Quest
21 Submarine
19 Gary Coleman
19 Panic of 1907
18 Patrick Tyler
17 Adam Smith
Talk:
33 Encyclopedia Dramatica
26 James Wesley Rawles
26 4chan
26 Mathematical economics
23 Adam Smith
22 Sports Chiropractic
22 Tulip mania
19 Charlie Crist
17 Los Angeles class submarine
17 Adam Smith/GA1
16 Galaxy Quest
14 Larry Craig
14 Richard A. Houghten
13 Mr Creosote
12 Deletionpedia
Category:
3 List-Class Economics articles
3 NA-importance Economics articles
Image:
2 Bloody Sunday 1969.jpg
2 VCCGB.png
2 John Fauquier.jpg
2 Smith medallion portrait.jpg
Image talk:
2 Corbata roja.jpg
MediaWiki talk:
4 Spam-whitelist
2 Uploadtext
Template:
8 Warhammer 40,000 Project
5 WikiProject September 11, 2001
4 WikiProject Economics
3 Warhammer-40,000-stub
3 User WikiProject Warhammer 40,000
2 Economics
2 Warhammer 40,000
Template talk:
14 Did you know
6 Film
2 Warhammer-40,000-stub
User:
103 Protonk
16 Protonk/Rescued
15 Protonk/NAC
11 Protonk/math
8 Protonk/Barnstars
7 NickPenguin/temp
6 Protonk/stats
5 Protonk/To do
4 Petercorless/Carpent tua poma nepotes
4 Protonk/monobook.js
4 Protonk/FPC
3 Casliber/Airplanes in popular culture
3 Protonk/huggle.css
3 Tealwisp/Space Marine Chapters
2 GoldDragon/Weapons of the Imperium (Warhammer 40,000)
User talk:
195 Protonk
97 Keeper76
67 Allemandtando
34 A Nobody
17 DGG
13 Benjiboi
12 Tealwisp/Space Marine Chapters
10 Inclusionist
10 Rossusna02
10 MiltonP Ottawa
10 A Man In Black
9 Thumperward
9 Future Perfect at Sunrise
7 Cretog8
7 PennySeven
Wikipedia:
234 Reliable sources/Noticeboard
105 Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
72 Good article nominations
71 Administrators' noticeboard
59 Administrator intervention against vandalism
37 WikiProject Warhammer 40,000
26 Articles for deletion/Space Battleship Yamato (spaceship) (2nd nomination)
25 Notability/RFC:compromise
19 Articles for deletion/Log/2008 September 6
18 Articles for deletion/Cheshire Cat in popular culture (2nd nomination)
18 Articles for deletion/Goatse.cx (5th nomination)
18 Articles for deletion/Log/2008 September 1
17 Articles for deletion/United Airlines in popular culture
16 WikiProject Warhammer 40,000/Templates
15 Articles for deletion/Hema Sinha (2nd nomination)
Wikipedia talk:
66 Articles for deletion
47 Article Rescue Squadron
32 WikiProject Economics
28 Biographies of living persons
22 Notability/RFC:compromise
22 Deletion policy
20 "In popular culture" articles
14 WikiProject Warhammer 40,000
13 Notability (fiction)
13 WikiProject Video games
11 Editing restrictions/Civility restrictions
9 Requests for adminship
8 Abuse filter
8 Criteria for speedy deletion
7 Deletion process
- Oppose because the candidate came here with bad intentions (how do we know we’re still not being had?), does not seem to understand how admin boards work and venue shopped/escalated tensions during a dispute (see User_talk:Protonk/Archive_1#Suggestion, User_talk:Protonk/Archive_1#Title_and_3RR, and User_talk:Protonk/Archive_1#RFCs), is too quick to fly off the handle/lose temper for a prospective admin (User_talk:Protonk/Archive_3#Rescue_tag_on_Ultramarines) and while claiming there that he wanted nothing to do with his opponent followed him around anyway as seen in Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Stormie/DRV notes and apparently was in no hurry even after that to let things be, has been warned for vandalism, and has engaged in edit warring. Also, look at the earliest edits here. His immediately jumping into AfDs is also somewhat unusual for a “new” user.--A Nobody 02:10, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- FYI to curious readers - this editor, A Nobody, is the 3rd name of the editor that Protonk referenced above in his answer to question 3 (conflicts). They have a history of disputes, albeit under the original name of the editor above. You should have no difficulty figuring out his previous names, but he was renamed because of stalking issues (according to him) so I won't say it outright. Avruch T 02:22, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, please don't as the concerns do remain to some degree. In any event, I do not wish to renew our past conflicts and hope that we will never have any negative future interactions. I am saying here what I feel I need to say after everything and will say no more. I have no wish to pile on or reignite things. Actually, I don't think that's really likely at this point anyway, as I'm not apt to be around much and I definitely don't have time for the areas in which we had run into past conflict any more. I really do not trust him as an admin due to our past experiences, although I always hold out hope that anyone can surprise me, and I have no desire to feel any animosity beyond that. I have said my peace and that is all. --A Nobody 02:30, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Anyone who isn't lobotomised would know you by that oppose. Interesting that your personal safety is apparently less important to you than opposing in your normal way. Everyme 04:02, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Be fair. He's renamed. He's in good standing. It doesn't much good to taunt him. Protonk (talk) 04:05, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- His immediately jumping into AfDs is also somewhat unusual for a “new” user. — So you're basically assuming that he is a sockpuppet of a prior account. Good, nothing better is to expect of you than such baseless allegations. If that's your "peace", I have to say your peace (or piece) sucks ass. Everyme 23:45, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- C'mon Everyme, leave it. He's made his vote, now let him be. How do you turn this on (talk) 23:49, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- You're right. It's just that I reread his oppose and the assumption of bad faith, and particularly the indirect way in which he incorporates that slandering is ugly. Oh so ugly. Everyme 23:54, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]