Third Violation of Temp Injunction[edit]

JarlaxleArtemis (talk · contribs) has violated his temporary injunction for a third time. He was warned three times (once for every time he broke the injunction), and he obviously has no intention of honoring the injunction. Therefore, User:Raul654 advised me over IRC to extend his current block from 24 hours to 1 week.

Additionally, any and all edits that Jarlaxle has made during the injunction, save those to his own user page and user talk page, I have reverted (under permission of Raul654, not suggestion or advisement). This is permissible, seeing that the edits he made were during a ban and therefore illegal under Wikipedia rules. Linuxbeak | Talk | Desk 03:35, August 12, 2005 (UTC)

After further violations of the same type, and personal attacks on Linuxbeak, I also blocked JarlaxleArtemis (talk · contribs) for one week. The block expires 02:27, September 14, 2005. -Willmcw 06:30, September 13, 2005 (UTC)

Some clarification requested[edit]

If at all possible, can the following issues be clarified?

How many arbitrators are needed to close this case
How many arbitrators are recused
How many arbitrators are inactive
How many arbitrators are needed for a majority
Why the temporary injunction, although clearly in place at the moment, is not indicated so on the front page or on the preliminary decision page

Thanks, Linuxbeak | Talk | Desk 18:50, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

JarlaxleArtemis banned indefintely[edit]

To the Arbitratiors as well as the accused:

On Sunday, September 18th, at roughly 03:10 GMT, I uncovered some extremely damning evidence against JarlaxleArtemis (talk · contribs). It turns out that Jarlaxle has been the person behind accounts that dot the front page of Special:Listusers.

Developer Tim Starling (talk · contribs) was kind enough ot cross reference a log file showing Jarlaxle's activities. You may find it at User:Linuxbeak/Admin stuff/JarlaxleArtemis.

As of right now, JarlaxleArtemis is now no longer allowed on Wikipedia. Thus, I move to close this Arbitration case due to special circumstances.

Linuxbeak | Talk | Desk 03:16, 18 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]