This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 |
October 2022 note: archive 6 is dedicated to the old Assessment talk page, now redirected to the main talk page.
I merged the talk pages on October 7, 2022, in order to centralize discussion around the main WikiProject talk page, since discussions will simply not get seen on other pages. DFlhb (talk) 18:44, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
I have done some major work on the plasq article and would like someone to assess it. Thank you. --Thekmc (talk) 17:03, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
Thekmc (talk · contribs), Done - Now start & low RhinosF1(chat)(status)(contribs) 22:36, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
The article is extended and is no longer stub. BTW, why is it covered by WikiProject Apple? I found no evidence that it runs on MacOS. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 12:23, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
The article Apple Inc. litigation needs to be re-assessed, as it was last assessed 2 years ago and its content has changed significantly since then. Please also assess as a good article candidate. Sctechlaw (talk) 10:42, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
I have also listed the article for peer review. Sctechlaw (talk) 22:08, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
I've unified and recreated the Features list, added a Critical Reception tab which displays the Reviews of the iPhone 3GS, and added the bootrom change that happened in September 2009 in the History tab. Just wanted to get it assessed. Justinxtreme (talk) 04:54, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
I've added much sourcing to the Info-Mac article, and tried to clean it up a fair amount. It needs both quality and importance scale ratings. Second opinions, please... Dpaanlka (talk) 07:12, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
Please review the B assessment of I Am Rich. Thank you. Rlsheehan (talk) 01:02, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
I've done some serious work on this Valve product since I created it immediately after its announcement in October. It is currently a C-class article for the video game task force, so I would like to see a similar rating for this task force. DarthBotto talk•cont 23:29, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
Feral Interactive is currently rated stub, but I've added citations to official sources (e.g. regarding its awards) and made significant updates (it now lists the entirety of the company's past and present games) and believe it qualifies for a higher rating. I'd also like to request an importance assessment for the article if possible. Eeeeeb (talk) 15:13, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Article has received a significant cleanup of sourcing and quality edits throughout. ahess247 (talk) 22:05, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
Updated a lot of the images and added more technical content. I'd be interested in hearing an outside opinion on it. Thanks for your help. PonyDuck21 (talk) 11:27, 12 August 2021 (UTC)