Computing Project‑class

This page is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles Project This page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. This page is supported by Computer hardware task force.

Wikipedia 0.7 is a collection of English Wikipedia articles due to be released on DVD, and available for free download, later this year. The Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team has made an automated selection of articles for Version 0.7.

We would like to ask you to review the articles selected from this project. These were chosen from the articles with this project's talk page tag, based on the rated importance and quality. If there are any specific articles that should be removed, please let us know at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.7. You can also nominate additional articles for release, following the procedure at Wikipedia:Release Version Nominations.

A list of selected articles with cleanup tags, sorted by project, is available. The list is automatically updated each hour when it is loaded. Please try to fix any urgent problems in the selected articles. A team of copyeditors has agreed to help with copyediting requests, although you should try to fix simple issues on your own if possible.

We would also appreciate your help in identifying the version of each article that you think we should use, to help avoid vandalism or POV issues. These versions can be recorded at this project's subpage of User:SelectionBot/0.7. We are planning to release the selection before December 2008, so we ask you to select the revisions before October 20. At that time, we will use an automatic process to identify which version of each article to release, if no version has been manually selected. Thanks! For the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial team, SelectionBot 16:15, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RAM Limit has been nominated for deletion. 76.66.196.229 (talk) 07:54, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is a notice to let you know about Article alerts, a fully-automated subscription-based news delivery system designed to notify WikiProjects and Taskforces when articles are entering Articles for deletion, Requests for comment, Peer review and other workflows (full list). The reports are updated on a daily basis, and provide brief summaries of what happened, with relevant links to discussion or results when possible. A certain degree of customization is available; WikiProjects and Taskforces can choose which workflows to include, have individual reports generated for each workflow, have deletion discussion transcluded on the reports, and so on. An example of a customized report can be found here.

If you are already subscribed to Article Alerts, it is now easier to report bugs and request new features. We are also in the process of implementing a "news system", which would let projects know about ongoing discussions on a wikipedia-wide level, and other things of interest. The developers also note that some subscribing WikiProjects and Taskforces use the display=none parameter, but forget to give a link to their alert page. Your alert page should be located at "Wikipedia:PROJECT-OR-TASKFORCE-HOMEPAGE/Article alerts". Questions and feedback should be left at Wikipedia talk:Article alerts.

Message sent by User:Addbot to all active wiki projects per request, Comments on the message and bot are welcome here.

Thanks. — Headbomb {^ταλκ_{κοντριβς} – WP Physics} 08:59, 15 March, 2009 (UTC)

Hi all

I am concerned that the article Disk storage, covering such topics as Gramaphone records, CD audio and HDD's, is being hijacked into "Computer disk storage"

Is it on one of your lists for attention ?

This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the WP 1.0 assessment system. On Saturday, January 23, 2010, the WP 1.0 bot will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's summary table will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the WP 1.0 project homepage. — Carl (CBM · talk) 03:10, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Before I go wildly implementing a change I agree with which was proposed over 5 years ago at the following link, I wanted to get some feedback since I assume this group would be interested and it appears the group in which the comment was posted was not interested in making the change.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category_talk:Computer_storage#Merging_of_subcategories Music Sorter (talk) 06:30, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notice: An RFC is being conducted here at Talk:Hard diskdrive#RFC on the use of the IEC prefixes. The debate under consideration is the use of this table of the “Hard disk drive” which includes a column comparing binary prefixes to describe capacities. We welcome your input--RaptorHunter (talk) 17:30, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Here also is a link to MOSNUM’s guidance on this issue: Wikipedia:MOSNUM#Quantities of bytes and bits. I hope that helps. Greg L (talk) 17:51, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article DAG Technology has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non notable, spam-like article. all references are from the company developing this

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dixy flyer (talk) 16:22, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

file:Example Image 2009 UTM.PNG (Universal Threat Management firewalls) has been nominated for deletion -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 04:54, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, if anyone could go to an AT&T store and get us a free picture of this particular smartphone before it fades into electronics oblivion, that'd be great. ViperSnake151  Talk  05:54, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

image:Newton logo.png has been nominated for deletion -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 05:16, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Motorola-A1600.jpg has been nominated for deletion -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 10:38, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, WikiProject Computing. You have new messages at WT:WikiProject Cellular devices#Make this a taskforce of WP:Telecommunications.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the ((Talkback)) or ((Tb)) template.

-- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 05:23, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

image:Note1Note2.jpg has been nominated for deletion -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 04:29, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

image:AppleiPhone4.jpg has been nominated for deletion -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 04:36, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

image:Google Nexus 7 2nd Gen 2013.jpg has been nominated for deletion -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 05:23, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

image:Galaxy Tab 3 7-inches.jpg has been nominated for deletion -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 05:26, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Laplets, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for Merging into Category:Microsoft Surface. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you.RevelationDirect (talk) 01:37, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is a notice about Category:Computing/Computer Hardware task force articles needing expert attention, which might be of interest to your WikiProject. It will take a while before the category is populated. Iceblock (talk) 19:50, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

On 3 September 2013, User:Matthiaspaul made a major contribution to the PC Card article by creating the History section which, among the history proper of the PC Card standard, also includes detailed and well-supported information about its creators, viz. the PCMCIA Association.

While the Association as such and its (arguably) foremost standard are closely related, they are in my view nonetheless two distinct, well-definded topics on their own, and hence would deserve separate articles – linked back and forth, of course. This is by the way the approach taken in other-language WPs and would greatly increase the visibility of said information for other-language visitors coming from a (less detailed) "PCMCIA" / "Personal Computer Memory Card International Association" article in their own language, only to find to their surprise that there is technically no English equivalent at present!

I am aware that initially the two topics indeed had distinct articles in the English WP which were then merged in 2010, but at the time without any rationale or user discussion. So in the light of the arguments put forth above, and the development over recent years, I would suggest to separate the two topics again, and volunteer to do the handiwork involved.

Opinions/comments anyone? -- Thanks, HReuter (talk) 00:32, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi all. This proposal makes sense, IMO. I support it, in particular if you can add more information to the topics. The association is a distinct topic from its various products, of which PCMCIA cards were only one. And both are notable, so they deserve their own articles.

This would not only make it easier to cross-link between Wikipedias, but also improve our internal organization (orthogonality).

Also, the original merge was carried out badly with a much too short time for discussion and most of the contents in the former article not actually merged into the new target.

--Matthiaspaul (talk) 22:15, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings! I have recently relisted a requested move discussion at Talk:Cannonlake#Requested move 10 February 2017, regarding a page relating to this WikiProject. Discussion and opinions are invited. Thanks, SkyWarrior 04:13, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The articles Pixel (smartphone) and Pixel 2 could potentially be merged onto the Google Pixel article. Any feedback is welcome and encouraged. The area for discussion can be found here. Plantduets (talk) 16:34, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Does anyone have any interest in looking at this page? See bottom of page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Pure_Storage Ianwikramanayake (talk) 20:52, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There is a request for comment on the reliability of Liliputing (liliputing.com) on the reliable sources noticeboard. If you are interested, please participate at WP:RSN § RfC: Liliputing. — Newslinger talk 20:43, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.

We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Abhilash Mhaisne, Andrewcrawford, ATMarsden, Daviddwd, Extide, Guy Macon, QuickWhitt7, Joseph507357, Kai Tak, Music Sorter, Ozhu, Some Gadget Geek, Tinucherian, Veikk0.ma, Veikk0.ma, Pysrinivaspeddi619:

Hello! You're still a participant in the WikiProject Computing Computer Hardware Task Force. This is just a reminder, as the project has been inactive for a while, and I wanted to give you a chance to review your participation.

Not all pinged participants may be active, but are being pinged as a just-in-case (maybe they get email notifications?) --moonythedwarf (Braden N.) 20:48, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am active in maintaining computer hardware articles. The task force doesn't help me to do this but I want to stay listed in case someone comes up with something that is worth doing. --Guy Macon (talk) 21:53, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm honored to be listed twice ;). I'm not overly active, but I watch numerous virtual reality hardware articles and occasionally improve them. Articles on AMD hardware are also something I edit at times. --Veikk0.ma 19:23, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Veikk0.ma, Whoops! Vivekvc. moonythedwarf (Braden N.) 01:01, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I only recently added myself. I spend most of my time over on the WPVG Nintendo Task Force, but I often lurk around computer hardware articles, especially AMD hardware, and Intel CPU architectures. ATMarsden^Talk 10:57, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm somewhat active. Mostly computer history topics. --mikeu ^talk 15:36, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The articles on Intel chips from about 2008 onward are a clusterf**k of misinformation. Microarchitectures are big families of similar designs. Netburst, for example, is a microarchitecture that includes the Willamette, Northwood, Prescott, and Cedar Mill cores. AMD's Bulldozer, Piledriver, Steamroller, and Excavator chips are all the same microarchitecture. But the articles on Intel chips from ~2008 onward seem to be written by Intel fanboys who erroneously refer to every single tick and tock as a "new architecture" in an attempt to exaggerate the technological progress that Intel has been making. Can we please clean this crap up and clarify which chips are actually new clean-sheet designs and which are just enhancements of previous designs? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.70.13.107 (talk) 07:58, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please help! Expert eyes are needed at Template talk:Sidebar arithmetic logic circuits.

In a nutshell, there is disagreement about the template caption. Originally "Part of a series on the ALU", I renamed it "Part of a series on arithmetic logic circuits" per the proposal and reasons given at the top of the talk page. The proposal seemed uncontroversial at the time, and objections were not raised for more than a year. This seems like it should be a straightforward matter but the conversation has moved sideways and evolved into a giant wall of text. The discussion is in desperate need of input from independent experts to get things back on track and reach a satisfactory resolution. Lambtron talk 15:47, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I've posted a few COI edit requests at Talk:Lattice Semiconductor. Sharing in case anyone here is interested in taking a look. Thank you for any help or feedback! Mary Gaulke (talk) 18:17, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Need your thoughts on whether a separate article should be created for Complex smart cards. Please discuss at Talk:Smart card AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 14:02, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Members of this Wikiproject may wish to contribute to the discussion at Talk:Computer keyboard#Deletion plan. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 22:22, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]