This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Discrimination and anything related to its purposes and tasks.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Shortcut WT:DISCR

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5Auto-archiving period: 1 year

Discrimination Project‑class

This page is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Discrimination on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination articles Project This page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Zezen[1] and GizzyCatBella[2] are comparing the anti-racist Affirmative action policy to the Nazi policy of Aryanization. This is deplorable, and Wikipedia should stop this!

There is a discussion at the Helms Amendment talk page which would benefit from input from people involved in this project, regarding the use of the term "anti-abortionist" to describe Jesse Helms. Wes sideman (talk) 14:26, 9 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I made an article Source of Income Discrimination, but it was rejected because there wasn't enough content. I know there is also a page called Discrimination in awarding Section 8 housing that covers the same subject, but the title is a misnomer, since it is actually discrimination in housing due to having been awarded Section 8 housing or other government assistance (Minnesota has source of income protection, but it does not apply to Section 8 housing). Is anyone able to rename that article to source of income discrimination, since that is what it is commonly known as (look at the new ordinances in Phoenix, AZ; Lawrence, KS; etc.)? I would like to fix up that page, but the title is inaccurate and lengthy. Catboy69 (talk 19:52, 11 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Anti-white racism has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 08:58, 24 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Acting white has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Onegreatjoke (talk) 21:39, 9 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality assessments by Wikipedia editors rate articles in terms of completeness, organization, prose quality, sourcing, etc. Most wikiprojects follow the general guidelines at Wikipedia:Content assessment, but some have specialized assessment guidelines. A recent Village pump proposal was approved and has been implemented to add a |class= parameter to ((WikiProject banner shell)), which can display a general quality assessment for an article, and to let project banner templates "inherit" this assessment.

No action is required if your wikiproject follows the standard assessment approach. Over time, quality assessments will be migrated up to ((WikiProject banner shell)), and your project banner will automatically "inherit" any changes to the general assessments for the purpose of assigning categories.

However, if your project has decided to "opt out" and follow a non-standard quality assessment approach, all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass ((WPBannerMeta)) a new |QUALITY_CRITERIA=custom parameter. If this is done, changes to the general quality assessment will be ignored, and your project-level assessment will be displayed and used to create categories, as at present. Aymatth2 (talk) 16:47, 10 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

United States has an RFC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Shoreranger (talk) 15:32, 12 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The redirect Sex-based rights has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 8 § Sex-based rights until a consensus is reached. Mathglot (talk) 17:12, 8 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

There is currently a discussion ongoing on whether to merge Genocide of the Ingrian Finns back into Deportation of the Ingrian Finns underway here, for which further input would be very valuable. Felix QW (talk) 18:10, 8 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, per point 3 of WP:PM, I am notifying this project of the merge discussion at Talk:Incel. This is based on a just recently closed AfD (see page of incels.is). The AfD closed with a consensus to merge, but since that consensus, I have increased the incels.is article a lot in sourcing and content though, so a merge may now not be necessary. 2001:48F8:3004:FC4:48EA:35CE:A536:B342 (talk) 20:37, 10 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I need outside view in the topic: Blacklist (computing), especially from those who have experience dealing with racial words and terms in Wikipedia articles. — Arthurfragoso (talk) 16:18, 11 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:List_of_intersex_Olympians#Suggestion_gathering:_improvements_to_coverage_of_intersex_and_DSD_athletes , which is within the scope of this WikiProject. Kingsif (talk) 06:32, 12 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please be aware that there is an active move discussion at Anti-Arabism. Iskandar323 (talk) 06:06, 9 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Allegations of genocide of Ukrainians in the Russian invasion of Ukraine#Requested move 4 August 2023 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 08:49, 14 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Anti-Arabism#Requested move 8 August 2023 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. – MaterialWorks 13:32, 15 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I was surprised to see that the article Human nature needs improvement per MOS:GNL and WP:GENDER -

article has many instances of "man" being used to mean "human being", "mankind" being used to mean "humanity", etc.

Please help improve this article per MOS:GNL and WP:GENDER. Thanks.

- 189.60.49.251 (talk) 06:21, 16 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I have created a page on the subject of Nakba denial - a topic of some weight in literature on the historiography of the Arab-Israeli conflict. I have barely scratched the surface of the available source, having prioritized the most readily accessible ones. There may very well be some gaping gaps, not least in that I don't have access to any of the best Ilan Pappé material, so haven't been able to directly quote him. More eyes welcome. Iskandar323 (talk) 19:25, 20 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Zviad_Gamsakhurdia#Gamsakhurdia's_alleged_chauvinism. a455bcd9 (Antoine) (talk) 09:35, 21 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An editor has requested that Israeli permit regime in the West Bank be moved to another page, which may be of interest to this WikiProject. You are invited to participate in the move discussion. GnocchiFan (talk) 20:31, 22 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

McCarthyism has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 22:07, 26 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Water supply and sanitation in the United States has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Hog Farm _Talk 02:21, 4 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your input is requested at Rosa Parks regarding Context or wordiness? discussion.

BlueWren0123 (talk) 15:15, 12 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]