Main pageTemplatesArticle assessmentCollaborationMembersDefinitionsPopular pagesTalk page
WikiProject Environment (Rated Project-class)
This environment-related page is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized.
Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.
 Project  This page does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
 
To-do list for Wikipedia:WikiProject Environment: edit·history·watch·refresh· Updated 2020-06-20

  • Please give these pages which I have created a bit of a look:
Climate change in the United States, Eco- , Environmental issues in Canada, Environmental issues in the United States, Toxic 100.
Cheers. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 09:55, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
  • Article Feedback Request:

Landfill Gas Clean Development Mechanism Projects in Brazil I am a student working with the Wikipedia Ambassador Program. Thanks for your feedback and suggestions. Deefalvo (talk) 16:41, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

Water pollution

Hello

Just a quick note to mention that the article Water pollution had been reviewed by an external expert Access to review notes here, as part of Wikipedia Primary School Research Project. Feedback welcome ! Anthere (talk)

By the way, I recently reworked this article, see here. EMsmile (talk) 02:13, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

What should the fossil fuel phase-out article look like?

If you have a view please comment at Talk:Fossil_fuel_phase-out#Scope_and_structure_of_the_article?

Thanks Chidgk1

Requested move at Talk:Assisted colonization#Requested move 19 August 2021

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Assisted colonization#Requested move 19 August 2021 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject.  — Shibbolethink ( ) 02:04, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

Solar power reassessment

Solar power has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Chidgk1 (talk) 17:15, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

Flexible-fuel vehicle

Flexible-fuel vehicle has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Chidgk1 (talk) 09:22, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

Indirect land use change impacts of biofuels

Indirect land use change impacts of biofuels has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Chidgk1 (talk) 15:32, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

More eyes needed for wastewater and sewage articles

Myself and User:Thewellman have recently been working on the articles on sewage, sewage treatment, wastewater and wastewater treatment. I would appreciated if a few more editors could cast their eyes on these articles (including their talk pages) and help us improve them further. I think those topics are important enough to warrant more than just two editors. Thanks in advance. (you don't have to be an expert in sewage treatment to contribute in a meaningful way) EMsmile (talk) 02:12, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

Reviving WikiProject Zoo

Hello, WikiProject Environment members, I am reviving WikiProject Zoo as I feel many of the zoo articles are lackluster. If anyone is interested in helping out, please do so. -- PaleoMatt (talk) 17:25, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

Wyss Foundation: Request for review

Hello WikiProject members! I recently posted a request to the Wyss Foundation article talk page asking that editors review some proposed revisions that I shared there. The context is that an IP editor added some material to the Wyss Foundation article that is critical of the 30x30 conservation plan, which is okay, but I think the surrounding paragraph would benefit from some additional details. I'm refraining from making any edits myself because of my COI (I work for the Wyss Foundation). My request is here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Wyss_Foundation#Proposed_edits_to_Conservation_subsection

Hoping someone here can review what I'm proposing. Thank you so much! ZH for Wyss Foundation (talk) 18:55, 10 September 2021 (UTC)