Woman Suffrage Procession
Official program for the Woman Suffrage Procession in Washington, D.C., March 3, 1913
DateMarch 3, 1913
LocationWashington, D.C.
Coordinates38°53′42″N 77°01′40″W / 38.89500°N 77.02778°W / 38.89500; -77.02778
Organised byNational American Woman Suffrage Association

The Woman Suffrage Procession on March 3, 1913, was the first suffragist parade in Washington, D.C. It was also the first large, organized march on Washington for political purposes.[citation needed] The procession was organized by the suffragists Alice Paul and Lucy Burns for the National American Woman Suffrage Association (NAWSA). Planning for the event began in Washington in December 1912. As stated in its official program, the parade's purpose was to "march in a spirit of protest against the present political organization of society, from which women are excluded."

Participation numbers vary between 5,000 and 10,000 marchers. Suffragists and supporters marched down Pennsylvania Avenue on Monday, March 3, 1913, the day before President Woodrow Wilson's inauguration. Paul had selected the venue and date to maximize publicity but met resistance from the D.C. police department. The demonstration consisted of a procession with floats, bands, and various groups representing women at home, in school, and the workplace. At the Treasury Building, a pageant of allegorical tableaux was acted out during the parade. The final act was a rally at the Memorial Continental Hall with prominent speakers, including Anna Howard Shaw and Helen Keller.

Before the event, black participation in the march threatened to cause a rift with delegations from Southern states. Some black people did march with state delegations. A group from Howard University participated in the parade. Some sources allege that Black women were segregated at the back of the parade; however, contemporary sources suggest that they marched with their respective state delegations or professional groups.

During the procession, district police failed to keep the enormous crowd off the street, impeding the marchers' progress. Many participants were subjected to heckling from spectators, though many supporters were present. The marchers were finally assisted by citizens' groups and eventually the cavalry. The police were subjected to a congressional inquiry due to security failures. The event premiered Paul's campaign to refocus the suffrage movement on obtaining a national constitutional amendment for woman's suffrage. This was intended to pressure President Wilson to support an amendment, but he resisted their demands for years afterward.

The procession was featured in the film Iron Jawed Angels in 2004. A new U.S. ten-dollar bill with parade imagery is planned for circulation in 2026.


Officers of the NAWSA about 1916. Front row: Mrs. Wood Park, Anna Howard Shaw, Carrie Chapman Catt, Helen H. Gardner: second row, Rose Emmet Young, Mrs. George Bass, and Ruth White.

American suffragists Alice Paul and Lucy Burns spearheaded a drive to adopt a national strategy for women's suffrage in the National American Woman Suffrage Association.[1]: 362 [2] Paul and Burns had seen first-hand the effectiveness of militant activism while working for Emmeline Pankhurst in the Women's Social and Political Union (WSPU) in Britain. Their education included rallies, marches, and demonstrations, knowledge the two would put to work back in America. They already had first-hand experience with imprisonment as a backlash against suffrage activism. They had gone on hunger strikes and suffered force-feeding.[3] They were not afraid to be provocative, even knowing the potential consequences. The procession would be their first foray into moving into militant mode on a national stage.[1]: 365 [4]

Paul and Burns found that many suffragists supported the WSPU's militant tactics, including Harriot Stanton Blatch, Alva Belmont, Elizabeth Robins, and Rhetta Child Dorr.[1]: 363–364 [5] Burns and Paul recognized that the women from the six states that had full suffrage at the time comprised a powerful voting bloc. They submitted a proposal to Anna Howard Shaw and the NAWSA leadership at their annual convention in 1912. The leadership was not interested in changing the state-by-state strategy and rejected the idea of holding a campaign that would hold the Democratic Party responsible. Paul and Burns appealed to prominent reformer Jane Addams, who interceded on their behalf, resulting in Paul being appointed chair of the Congressional Committee.[1]: 362 [6]

Until this time, the women's suffrage movement had relied on oratory and written arguments to keep the issue before the public. Paul believed it was time to add a strong visual element to the campaign, even grander than she had planned for the NAWSA 1912 conference.[7] While her tactics were nonviolent, Paul exploited elements of danger in her events.[8] Her plan for using visual rhetoric was intended to have lasting impact.[9] She felt it was time for women to stop begging for suffrage and demand it with political coercion instead.[10][11] Though the suffragists had staged marches in many cities,[12] this would be a first for Washington, D.C. It would also be the first large political demonstration in the nation's capital. The only previous similar demonstration was made by a group of five hundred men known as Coxey's Army, who had protested about unemployment in 1894.[4]

At the time Paul and Burns were assigned to lead the Congressional Committee of the NAWSA, it was merely a shadow committee headed by Elizabeth Kent, wife of a California congressman, with an annual budget of ten dollars that mostly went unspent.[1]: 362 [13] With Paul and Burns in charge, the committee revived the push for a national suffrage amendment.[14] At the end of 1913, Paul reported to the NAWSA that the committee had raised and expended over $25,000 on the suffrage cause for the year.[1]: 377 [15]

Paul and Burns persuaded NAWSA to endorse an immense suffrage parade in Washington, D.C., to coincide with newly elected President Woodrow Wilson's inauguration the following March. The NAWSA leadership turned over the entire operation to the committee.[16] They organized volunteers, planned, and raised funds in preparation for the parade with little help from the NAWSA.[17]


Members of the Congressional Committee of the NAWSA. Back row, second from left is Nina Allender; second from right is Hazel MacKaye; far right Elsie Hill. Front row (L to R): Glenna Tinnin, Helen Gardener, Alice Paul, Elizabeth Thatcher Kent, and Genevieve Stone.

Committees and recruiting

Once the board approved the parade in December 1912, it appointed Dora Lewis, Mary Ritter Beard, and Crystal Eastman to the committee, though they all worked outside of Washington. All money Paul collected had to be directed through the NAWSA, though she did not always comply.[17][18]

Paul arrived in Washington, D.C., in December 1912 to begin organizing the event. By the time the Congressional Committee had its first meeting in its new Washington headquarters on January 2, 1913, more than 130 women had shown up to start work.[18] Using the list of former committee members, Paul found few still alive or in the city, but she did find assistance.[13]

Among local suffragists, she was aided by attorney Florence Etheridge and teacher Elsie Hill, daughter of a congressman. Kent, the former committee chair, was instrumental in opening doors in Washington to Paul and Burns. From the NAWSA, Paul recruited Emma Gillett and Helen Hamilton Gardener to be treasurer and publicity chair, respectively.[19] Belva Lockwood, who had run for president in 1884, also attended the initial meeting.[13][20] Paul recruited Hazel MacKaye to design professional floats and allegorical tableaux to be presented simultaneously with the procession.[21] The parade was officially named the Woman Suffrage Procession. Per the event program, the stated purpose was to "march in a spirit of protest against the present political organization of society, from which women are excluded."[22]: cover, 3  Doris Stevens, who worked closely with Paul, stated that "...the procession was to dramatize in numbers and beauty the fact that women wanted to vote - that women were asking the Administration in power in the national government to speed the day."[23]

The timing of the date for the procession, March 3, was important because incoming president Woodrow Wilson, whose inauguration was to take place the following day, would be put on notice that this would be a key issue during his term. Paul wanted to put pressure on him to support a national amendment. It also ensured that the procession would enjoy a large audience and publicity.[1]: 364 [20] Many factors deterred Paul regarding her selected date: District suffragists worried about the weather; the superintendent of police objected to the timing; even Paul herself was concerned about the need to attract a large number of marchers in a short time frame and get them organized.[7] Fortunately, Washington had congressional delegations from all the states, and some of their wives could be counted on to represent those states. Likewise, the embassies could provide marchers from distant countries.[24]

To maximize the use of funds for publicity and building a national network, the Congressional Committee made it clear that participating organizations and delegations would need to fund their own travel, lodging, and other expenses.[1]: 368 [25]

Parade route and security

Suffrage march line

Just as the parade's timing was tied to the inauguration, so was the route Paul preferred to have the maximum impact on public perception. She requested a permit to march down Pennsylvania Avenue from the Peace Monument to the Treasury Building, then on to the White House before ending at Continental Hall.[26] District superintendent of police, Major Richard H. Sylvester, offered a permit for Sixteenth Street, which would have taken the procession through a residential area, past several embassies.[27] He later claimed he had thought the suffragists wished to hold the parade at night, and the police could not have provided sufficient security if they marched from the Capitol.[26] Sylvester pointed out the rough character of lower Pennsylvania Avenue and the type of people likely to attend the inauguration. Paul was not satisfied with his alternative route. She took her request to the District commissioners and the press. Eventually, they relented and granted her request.[28] Elsie Hill and her mother had also pressured Sylvester by appealing to Elsie's father in Congress. Congress had the ultimate responsibility and funding control over the District police department.[26]

The presidential inauguration brought a huge influx of visitors from around the country. Media estimated crowds of a quarter to a half million people. Anticipating that most of these people would come to observe the suffrage parade, Paul was concerned about the ability of the local police force to handle the crowd; her disquiet proved to be justified by events.[29][30] Sylvester had only volunteered a force of 100 officers, which Paul considered inadequate.[31] She attempted to get intervention from President William Howard Taft, who referred her to Secretary of War Henry L. Stimson.[29] The week before the parade, Congress passed a resolution directing district police to halt all traffic from the Peace Monument to 17th Street from 3 p.m. to 5 p.m. on the day of the parade and prevent any interference with the procession.[32][33] Paul recruited a woman with political connections to intervene. Elizabeth Selden Rogers contacted her brother-in-law, Secretary Stimson, to request cavalry to provide additional security. He first claimed that using the soldiers for that purpose was prohibited, but later agreed to place troops on standby in case of emergency.[34]

Countering anti-suffrage sentiments

Paul strategically emphasized beauty, femininity, and traditional female roles in the procession. Her chosen theme for the procession was "Ideals and Virtues of American Womanhood".[35] These characteristics were perceived by anti-suffragists as being most threatened by giving women the vote. She wanted to show that women could be all those things and still be intelligent and competent to vote and fill any other role in society. Attractiveness and professional talent were not mutually exclusive. These ideals were embodied in the selection of the parade's herald, Inez Milholland, a labor lawyer from New York City who had been dubbed "the most beautiful suffragette".[36] Milholland had served in the same role in a suffrage march in the city the previous year.[37]

The procession

The lineup of marchers

The Just Government League of Maryland marching with a variation of the Gadsden flag.

Media reported that the suffrage parade outshone even the inauguration.[34] Special suffrage trains were hired to bring spectators from other cities, adding to the crowds in Washington. The novelty of the procession attracted enormous interest throughout the eastern U.S.[38] As the parade participants gathered near the Peace Monument around noon, the police began roping off part of the parade route.[38][39]: 9  Even before the parade began, the ropes were badly stretched and coming loose in places.[40] The procession drew such a crowd that President-elect Wilson was mystified about why there were no people to be seen when he arrived in town that day.[23]

Inez Milholland led the procession.
Head of the Woman Suffrage Procession with herald Inez Milholland at the front
Woman band in the Woman Suffrage Procession

Jane Walker Burleson on horseback, accompanying a model of the Liberty Bell brought from Philadelphia, led the procession as Grand Marshal, immediately followed by the herald, Milholland, on a white horse. A pale-blue cape flowed over her white suit, held on by a Maltese cross.[41] Her banner proclaimed "Forward into Light", a phrase originated by Pankhurst and later used by Blatch. Immediately behind the herald was a wagon that boldly stated "We Demand An Amendment To The Constitution Of The United States Enfranchising The Women Of This Country".[36] Next was the national board of the NAWSA, headed by Shaw.[42]

To add to the visual impact, Paul dictated a color scheme for each group of marchers. The rainbow of colors represented women coming into the light of the future out of the darkness of the past.[35] To add drama between groups of marching women, "Paul recruited 26 floats, 6 golden chariots, 10 bands, 45 captains, 200 marshals, 120 pages, 6 mounted heralds, and 6 mounted brigades", according to Adams and Keene.[41] Estimates about the number of participants in the procession varied from 5,000 to 10,000.[43][44]

The first section had marchers and floats from countries where women already had the vote: Norway, Finland, Australia, and New Zealand.[22]: 5  The second section had floats depicting historic scenes from the suffrage movement in 1840, 1870, and 1890. Then came a float representing the state of the campaign in 1913 in a positive tableau of women inspiring a group of girls. A series of floats depicted men and women working side by side at home and in various professions. They were followed by one with a man holding a representation of government on his shoulders while a woman with hands tied stood helpless at his side.[45]

A float depicted nurses, followed by a marching group of nurses. Groups of women representing traditional roles of motherhood and homemaking came next to change the image of suffragists as being sexless working women.[46] There followed a carefully orchestrated order of professional women, beginning with various nursing groups, the Woman's Christian Temperance Union and the PTA, before finally adding in non-traditional careers such as lawyers, artists, and businesswomen.[47]

After a float depicting the Bill of Rights came a banner that showed the nine suffrage states in bright colors with the remaining states in black. This theme was also graphically depicted using women dressed similarly. They carried a banner suggesting that vote-less women were enslaved to men with the vote, quoting Abraham Lincoln: "No Country Can Exist Half Slave and Half Free". Another Lincoln quote was featured at the top of the official program: "I go for all sharing the privilege of the government who assist in bearing its burdens, by no means excluding women." Women from the suffrage states displayed their colorful organization banners on chariots that preceded each group.[48]

One prominent group featured in the procession was the pilgrims led by "General" Rosalie Jones. The brown-caped hikers covered more than 200 mi (320 km) from New York City to Washington in sixteen days. Their journey received considerable press coverage, and a large crowd assembled to greet them upon their arrival in the city on February 28.[34]

Allegorical tableaux

Simultaneous with the procession, an allegorical tableau unfolded on the Treasury Building's steps.[49] The pageant was written by dramatist Hazel MacKaye and directed by Glenna Smith Tinnin.[50] These scenes were performed by silent actors to portray various attributes of patriotism and civic pride, which both men and women strove to emulate. The audience would recognize the presentation style from similar holiday events nationwide. MacKaye set each scene using women clad in toga-style costumes and accompanied by symbolic parlor music that would also be familiar to the audience.[51]

German actress Hedwiga Reicher in the role of Columbia

The act began with a relay of trumpet calls from the Peace Monument to the Treasury Building. The first scene featured Columbia, who stepped forward on stage to the strains of "The Star-Spangled Banner". She summoned Liberty, Charity, Justice, Hope, and Peace to join her. In the final scene, Columbia placed herself as guardian over all these others, and they assembled to watch the approaching procession of suffragists.[22] By creating this stunning drama, Paul differentiated the American suffrage movement from Britain's "by fully appropriating the best possibilities of nonviolent visual rhetoric" per Adams and Keene.[52]

Notable participants

Some women listed were well-known before the event, while others became noteworthy later. Most names come from the official event program.

Florence Fleming Noyes as Liberty and her attendants. A suffrage tableau on the steps of the Treasury Building. March 3, 1913.

Security failure

The parade and tableaux at the Treasury Building were scheduled to begin simultaneously at 3 p.m. However, the trumpet call starting the procession did not sound until 3:25 p.m. At the lead were several police escort vehicles and six mounted officers in a wedge formation. By the time the front of the parade reached 5th Street, the crowd had completely blocked the avenue. At that point, the police escort seemed to vanish into the crowd.[46] Milholland and others on horseback used the animals to help push back the crowds. Paul, Burns, and other committee members brought a couple of automobiles to the front to help create a passage for the procession. The police had done little to open the parade route as they'd been ordered to do by Congress. Sylvester, who was at the train station awaiting Wilson's arrival, heard about the problem and called the cavalry unit on standby at Fort Myers. However, the mounted soldiers did not arrive on the scene until around 4:30 p.m. They were then able to usher the parade to its completion.[30]

Male and female spectators surged into the street, though men were the majority. There were both hecklers and supporters, but parade-marshal Burleson and other women in the procession were intimidated, particularly by the hostile chants.[46] The Evening Star (Washington) published a review highlighting positive responses to the parade and pageant.[53] The crush of people led to trampling: More than two hundred people were treated for injuries at local hospitals.[54] At one point, Paul sympathetically acknowledged that the police were overwhelmed and not enough of them had been assigned to the parade, but she soon changed her stance to maximize publicity for her cause.[55] The police arrested some spectators and fined them for crossing over the ropes.[39]: 174 

Before the cavalry arrived, other people began helping with crowd control. At times the marchers had been forced to go single file to move forward.[33] Boy Scouts with batons helped push back spectators. A group of soldiers linked arms to hold people back. Some of the black drivers from the floats also stepped in to help.[56] The Massachusetts and the Pennsylvania national guards stepped in, too. Eventually, boys from the Maryland Agricultural College created a human barrier protecting the women from the angry crowd and helping them reach their destination.[57]

Rally at Continental Hall

The final act was a meeting at the Memorial Continental Hall (later part of the expanded DAR Constitution Hall). Speakers were Anna Howard Shaw, Carrie Chapman Catt, Mary Johnston, and Helen Adams Keller.[29] Shaw, reflecting on the failure of police protection, stated that she was ashamed of the national capital, but she praised the marchers. She also recognized that they could use publicity about police failures to the suffragists' advantage. Blatch had used a similar security failure in New York in 1912 to the suffragists' advantage.[58]


Alice Paul's response

Though she first sympathized with the overwhelmed police force at the parade, Paul quickly capitalized on the verbal abuse the marchers had endured. She blamed the police for colluding with violent opposition to the nonviolent demonstration. She asked participants to write affidavits about negative reactions they'd experienced, which Paul used to request Congressional action against Chief Sylvester. She also used these statements to generate press releases in Washington and nationwide, garnering additional publicity for the suffrage procession. The resulting publicity also brought in additional donations that helped Paul cover the event's cost of $13,750.[59]

Paul's publicity campaign stressed that the marchers had demonstrated bravery and nonviolent resistance to the hostile crowd. Several suffragists pointed out in the media that a government that couldn't protect its female citizens could not properly represent them. Paul's deft handling of the situation made woman's suffrage one of the most-discussed subjects in America.[59][60]

Paul also orchestrated a meeting, primarily of political men who were suffrage supporters, at the Columbia Theater. The purpose was to pressure Congress to hold hearings about police misconduct. Key participants included activist attorney Louis Brandeis (who became a Supreme Court justice in 1916) and Minnesota senator Moses Edwin Clapp. She kept her role in organizing the event out of the spotlight.[60]

Congressional response

March 8, 1913, front page of Woman's Journal

The Senate Committee on the District of Columbia quickly organized a subcommittee hearing to determine why the crowds at the parade had gotten out of hand.[33] They listened to testimony and read numerous affidavits. Hearings were held March 6–13 and April 16–17. Sylvester defended his actions and blamed individual police officers for disobeying his orders. In the end, Sylvester was exonerated, but public opinion toward him was unfavorable.[1]: 371  When he was finally forced to resign in 1915 due to an unrelated incident, the mishandling of the 1913 parade was seen as instrumental in his ouster.[61]

President Wilson

Alice Paul and the Congressional Union asked President Wilson to push Congress for a federal amendment, beginning with a deputation to the White House shortly after the parade and in several additional visits. He responded initially by saying he had never considered the matter, though he told a Colorado delegation in 1911 that he was pondering the subject. Though he assured the women he would consider it, he did not act on the issue; eventually, he flatly remarked there was no room for suffrage on his agenda.[62] The deputation wished Wilson to press his party to support suffrage legislation. He asserted that he had no influence over his party's actions in Congress. Still, for issues he considered important, he did use his leverage in a partisan manner, such as with repealing the Panama Canal tolls act.[63]

When asked if it had been unwise for her to push Wilson for his stance on woman's suffrage, Paul responded that it was important to make the public aware of his position so they could use it against him when the time came to put pressure on the Democrats during an election.[64] It took until 1918 for Wilson to finally change his stance on the suffrage amendment.[65][66]

Impacts on the suffrage movement

Paul inaugurated her leadership in the American suffrage movement with the 1913 procession. This event revived the push for a federal woman's suffrage amendment, a cause that the NAWSA had allowed to languish.[2] Little more than a month after the parade, the Susan B. Anthony amendment was re-introduced in both houses of Congress.[67] For the first time in decades, it was debated on the floor.[1][68] The demonstration on Pennsylvania Avenue was the precursor to Paul's other high-profile events that, along with actions by the NAWSA, culminated in the passage of the Nineteenth Amendment to the U. S. Constitution in 1919 and its ratification in 1920.[69][1]: 425–428 

Paul's focus on a federal amendment contrasted sharply with the NAWSA's state-by-state approach to suffrage, leading to a rift between the Constitutional Committee and the national board. The committee disassociated from the NAWSA and became the Congressional Union.[70] The Congressional Union eventually became subsumed by the National Woman's Party, also led by Paul, in 1916.[71]


In film

The Woman Suffrage Procession was featured in the 2004 film Iron Jawed Angels, which chronicles the strategies of Alice Paul, Lucy Burns, and the National Woman's Party as they lobby and demonstrate for the passage of the 19th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which would assure voting rights for all American women.[72]

United States currency

On April 20, 2016, Treasury Secretary Jack Lew announced plans for the back of the new $10 note to feature an image of the 1913 Woman Suffrage Procession that passed the steps of the Treasury Department where the allegorical tableaux took place. It is also planned to honor many of the leaders of the suffrage movement, including Lucretia Mott, Sojourner Truth, Susan B. Anthony, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, and Alice Paul. The front of the new $10 note is to retain the portrait of Alexander Hamilton. Designs for new $5, $10, and $20 bills were to be unveiled in 2020.[73] Later, it was said that the new note would not be ready for circulation until 2026.[74]

Anti-black racism

The woman's suffrage movement, led in the nineteenth century by women such as Susan B. Anthony and Elizabeth Cady Stanton, had its genesis in the abolitionist movement, but by the dawn of the twentieth century, Anthony's goal of universal suffrage was eclipsed by a near-universal racism in the United States.[75][76] While earlier suffragists had believed the two issues could be linked, the passage of the Fourteenth Amendment and Fifteenth Amendment created a division between African American rights and suffrage for women by prioritizing voting rights for black men over universal suffrage for all men and women.[77] In 1903, the NAWSA officially adopted a platform of states' rights that was intended to mollify and bring Southern U.S. suffrage groups into the fold. The statement's signers included Anthony, Carrie Chapman Catt, and Anna Howard Shaw.

Ida B. Wells-Barnett marched with her state delegation despite being told to march with other blacks in another section.

With the prevalence of segregation throughout the country and within organizations such as the NAWSA, blacks had formed activist groups to fight for their equal rights. Many were college educated and resented their exclusion from political power. The fiftieth anniversary of the Emancipation Proclamation issued by President Abraham Lincoln in 1863 also fell in 1913, giving them even further incentive to march in the suffrage parade.[78] Nellie Quander of Alpha Kappa Alpha sorority asked for a place in the college women's section for the women of Howard.[79] In a letter dated February 17, 1913 to Alice Paul, Quander discusses the desire for the women of Howard to be given a desirable place in the march and requests Paul to identify a suitable speaker to replace Jane Addams, who was scheduled to address the sorority in March but was preparing to travel to Egypt.[80] These letters were follow up discussions to the one began by Paul and initiated by Elise Hill when Hill went down to Howard University at the request of Paul to recruit the Howard women.[81][82] The Howard University group included "Artist, one—Mrs. May Howard Jackson; college women, six—Mrs. Mary Church  Terrell, Mrs. Daniel Murray, Miss Georgia Simpson, Miss Charlotte Steward, Miss Harriet Shadd, Miss Bertha McNiel; teacher,  one—Miss Caddie Park; musician, one—  Mrs. Harriett G. Marshall; professional  women, two— Dr. Amanda V. Gray, Dr. Eva  Ross. Illinois delegation—Mrs. Ida Wells-Barnett; Michigan—Mrs. McCoy, of Detroit,  who carried the banner; Howard University, group of twenty-five girls in caps and gowns;  homemakers—Mrs. Duffield, who carried  New York banner, Mrs. M. D. Butler, Mrs.  Carrie W. Clifford." One trained nurse, whose name could not  be ascertained, marched, and a child caregiver was brought down by the Delaware delegation.[83]

But the Virginia-born Gardener tried to persuade Paul that including blacks would be a bad idea because the Southern delegations threatened to pull out of the march. Paul had attempted to keep news about black marchers out of the press, but when the Howard group announced they intended to participate, the public became aware of the conflict.[84] A newspaper account indicated that Paul told some black suffragists that the NAWSA believed in equal rights for "colored women" but that some Southern women were likely to object to their presence. A source in the organization insisted that the official stance was to "permit negroes to march if they cared to".[84] In a 1974 oral history interview, Paul recalled the "hurdle" of Terrell's plan to march, which upset the Southern delegations. She said the situation was resolved when a Quaker leading the men's section proposed that men march between the Southern and Howard University groups.[85]

While in Paul's memory, a compromise was reached to order the parade as southern women, then the men's section, and finally the black women's section, reports in the NAACP paper, The Crisis, depict events unfolding quite differently, with black women protesting the plan to segregate them.[69] What is clear is that some groups attempted, on the day of the parade, to segregate their delegations.[38] For example, a last-minute instruction by the chair of the state delegation section, Genevieve Stone, caused an additional uproar when she asked the Illinois delegation's sole black member, Ida B. Wells-Barnett, to march with the segregated black group at the back of the parade. Some historians claim Paul made the request, though this seems unlikely after the official NAWSA decision.[84][38] Wells-Barnett eventually rejoined the Illinois delegation as the procession moved down the avenue. In the end, black women marched in several state delegations, including New York and Michigan. Some joined in with their co-workers in professional groups. There were also black men driving many of the floats.[58] The spectators did not treat the black participants any differently.[58]

See also


  1. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k Dodd, Lynda G. (Fall 2008). "Parades, Pickets, and Prison: Alice Paul and the Virtues of Unruly Constitutional Citizenship" (PDF). Journal of Law & Politics. 24 (4): 339–433.
  2. ^ a b Zahniser and Fry (2014). p. 126.
  3. ^ Kraditor (1965). pp. 279-280.
  4. ^ a b Adams and Keene (2008). p. 77.
  5. ^ Ludardini (1986). pp. 7–8.
  6. ^ Lunardini (1986). pp. 20-21.
  7. ^ a b Zahniser and Fry (2014). p. 128.
  8. ^ Adams and Keene (2008). pp. 98, 116.
  9. ^ Adams and Keene (2008). p. 76.
  10. ^ Kraditor (1965). pp. 231–232.
  11. ^ Stevens (1920). p. 13.
  12. ^ Zahniser and Fry (2014). pp. 130-134.
  13. ^ a b c Adams and Keene (2008). p. 78.
  14. ^ Wheeler, ed. (1995). p. 305.
  15. ^ Stevens (1920). p. 28.
  16. ^ Lunardini (1986). p.21-22.
  17. ^ a b Lunardini (1986). pp. 22-24.
  18. ^ a b Zahniser and Fry (2014). p. 129.
  19. ^ Zahniser and Fry (2014). p. 127.
  20. ^ a b Lunardini (1986). p. 25.
  21. ^ Adams and Keene (2008). p. 79.
  22. ^ a b c Brown, Harriet Connor, ed. (March 3, 1913). "Official Program Woman Suffrage Procession". Library of Congress.
  23. ^ a b Stevens (1920). p. 21.
  24. ^ Zahniser and Fry (2014). p. 133.
  25. ^ Lunardini (1986). p.26.
  26. ^ a b c Adams and Keene (2008). p. 80.
  27. ^ Zahniser and Fry (2014). p. 135.
  28. ^ Zahniser and Fry (2014). p. 136
  29. ^ a b c "Plans for Suffrage Demonstration To-day". The Washington Herald. March 3, 1913. p. 1, c. 4.
  30. ^ a b Zanhniser and Fry (2014). p. 147.
  31. ^ Zahniser and Fry (2014). p. 142.
  32. ^ United States Senate. Committee on the District of Columbia. (1913). Suffrage Parade: Hearings Before a Subcommittee of the Committee on the District of Columbia United States Senate. Sixty-third Congress. First Session under S. Res. 499 of March 4, 1913, Directing Said Committee to Investigate the Conduct of the District Police and Police Department of the District of Columbia in Connection with the Woman's Suffrage Parade on March 3, 1913...Part 2. Washington, D. C.: Government Printing Office. pp. 733.
  33. ^ a b c "Senate Orders Inquiry Into Failure of Police to Protect Suffragists". The Evening Star. Washington. March 4, 1913. p. 12, c. 7.
  34. ^ a b c Zahniser and Fry (2014). p. 143.
  35. ^ a b Adams and Keene (2008). p. 81.
  36. ^ a b Zahniser and Fry (2014). p. 145.
  37. ^ Adams (1967). p. 127.
  38. ^ a b c d Zahniser and Fry (2014). p. 144.
  39. ^ a b c United States Senate. Committee on the District of Columbia. (1913). Suffrage Parade: Hearings Before a Subcommittee of the Committee on the District of Columbia, United States Senate, Sixty-third Congress, Special-[first] Session of the Senate, Under S. Res. 499, of March 4, 1913, Directing Said Committee to Investigate the Conduct of the District Police and Police Department of the District of Columbia in Connection with the Woman's Suffrage Parade on March 3, 1913 ... Part 1 (Public domain ed.). Government Printing Office.
  40. ^ "Score the Police for Inefficiency". The Evening Star. Washington. March 4, 1913. p. 1, c. 4.
  41. ^ a b Adams and Keene (2008). p. 82.
  42. ^ Zahniser and Fry (2014). pp. 145–146.
  43. ^ Flexner (1959). p. 272.
  44. ^ Stevens (1920). p. 22.
  45. ^ Adams and Keene (2008). p. 86
  46. ^ a b c Zahniser and Fry (2014). p. 146.
  47. ^ Adams and Keene (2008). pp. 86–87.
  48. ^ Adams and Keene (2008). p. 88.
  49. ^ "Suffrage Parade Facts". The Washington Post. March 3, 1913. p. 1, c. 7 (subscription required).
  50. ^ a b Woelfle, Gretchen (2009). "TAKING IT to the STREET." Cobblestone. Retrieved March 12, 2015.
  51. ^ Adams and Keene (2008). p. 89.
  52. ^ Adams and Keene (2008). p. 91.
  53. ^ "Suffrage Crusaders in Thrilling Pageant Take City by Storm". The Evening Star. Washington. March 3, 1913. p. 1, c. 1.
  54. ^ The Washington Post, March 5, 1913; The New York Times, March 4–5, 1913.
  55. ^ Adams and Keene (2008). p. 92.
  56. ^ Zahniser and Fry (2014). p. 148.
  57. ^ Flexner (1959). p. 273.
  58. ^ a b c Zahniser and Fry (2014). p. 149.
  59. ^ a b Lunardini (1986). p. 31.
  60. ^ a b Adams and Keene (2008). pp. 95–96.
  61. ^ Adams and Keene (2008). pp. 96–97.
  62. ^ Stevens (1920). pp. 22–23.
  63. ^ Stevens (1920). pp. 29–30.
  64. ^ Stevens (1920). p. 15.
  65. ^ Wheeler, ed. (1995). p. 18.
  66. ^ Lunardini (1986). p. xiii.
  67. ^ Stevens (1920). p. 23.
  68. ^ Stevens (1920). p. 24.
  69. ^ a b Harvey, Sheridan. "Marching for the Vote: Remembering the Woman Suffrage Parade of 1913". American Women: A Library of Congress Guide for the Study of Women's History and Culture in the United States. Library of Congress. Retrieved January 21, 2019.
  70. ^ Dodd (2008). pp. 377–379.
  71. ^ Adams (1967). pp. 131–132.
  72. ^ Stanley, Allesandra (February 13, 2004). "TV Weekend; Determined Women, Finding Their Voice". New York Times.
  73. ^ "Treasury Secretary Lew Announces Front of New $20 to Feature Harriet Tubman, Lays Out Plans for New $20, $10 and $5". Dept. of the Treasury. April 20, 2016. Retrieved December 11, 2017.
  74. ^ Brown, Elisha (April 18, 2018). "What happened to the plan to put Harriet Tubman on the $20 bill?". The Daily Beast.
  75. ^ Kraditor (1965). footnote p. 164.
  76. ^ Wheeler, ed. (1995). p. 147.
  77. ^ Wheeler, ed. (1995). p. 31-32.
  78. ^ Zahniser and Fry (2014). p. 140.
  79. ^ "Exhibition Items Seneca Falls and Building a Movement, 1776–1890 Early Feminist Inspirations". Library of Congress.
  80. ^ "#19SuffrageStories Countdown: Stories 14 to 10". Smithsonian Because of Her. August 10, 2020. Archived from the original on March 10, 2022.
  81. ^ "Colored women in Suffrage Parade". The Times Dispatch. March 2, 1913. Retrieved October 1, 2021.
  82. ^ Fry, Amelia (1976). "Suffragists Oral History Project Conversations with Alice Paul: Woman Suffrage and the Equal Rights Amendment Alice Paul". Online Archive of California. Retrieved October 1, 2021.
  83. ^ Dubois, William Edward Burghardt (April 1913). "Suffrage Paraders". Google Books.
  84. ^ a b c "Colored Women in Suffrage Parade" (PDF). Richmond, Virginia): The Times-Dispatch. March 2, 1913. p. 2. Archived (PDF) from the original on May 11, 2017. Retrieved March 29, 2017.
  85. ^ Gallagher, Robert A. (1974). "I Was Arrested, Of Course". American Heritage. 25 (2): 20.