Hallo Kanashimi, herzlich willkommen in der Wikipedia. | |||||
Ich freue mich schon auf deine weiteren Beiträge. Hier ein paar Hinweise auf ggf. hilfreiche Seiten. | |||||
Prinzipien der Wikipedia | Grundlegende Dinge – Schritt für Schritt | Umgang mit Quellen | |||
Antworten auf häufige Fragen | Die wichtigsten Dinge für einen guten Start | Richtlinien der Wikipedia | |||
Portale und Projekte nach Themen | Zum Ausprobieren | Typische Missverständnisse | |||
Für Fragen | Finde einen Mentor. | Alle Hilfe-Seiten auf einen Blick | |||
Hast du Fragen an mich? Schreib mir auf meiner Diskussionsseite! Beste Grüße, ca$e 20:22, 15. Jul. 2011 (CEST) |
@MBq, Silewe: Hi. Sorry for bothering you. I am a bot operator on several wiki projects. Here lists up the tasks on enwiki. I am wondering maybe I can improve dewiki via transplant some tasks to dewiki. For example,
Hello, Kanashimi, here Cewbot went much too fast with an edit, and this actually made me a bit angry, because I was just editing these section links and the bot’s edit was not as good as necessary:
I consider this fast reaction not giving time for manual fixes inacceptable.
Aside from the too fast action there was more to do (confer my follow-up edit), but I first had to realize that your bot does not change the displayed part of a link making it much less useful, though I admit these are kind of special cases here. (@Krd: Das scheint bei der Erteiligung des Botrechts nicht überprüft worden zu sein.)
This related edit was not surprising also too fast (ten seconds after the other one, “11. Oktober 2023, 03:02:00 Uhr”), but I had forgotten to search for occurrences of this specific string and noticed it only moments before starting this report/complaint, so at least in this case the action was OK. However, I had to edit the displayed text, again. On the other hand, this shows that manual editing for this part may in fact the better choice, I am uncertain about this.
I actually wonder, whether a cooperation with aka and his Benutzer:Aka/Fehlerlisten/falsche Abschnittlinks wouldn’t be a better solution. — Speravir – 01:16, 12. Okt. 2023 (CEST)
In addition: I have recently made some other edits related to changed section links and had no encounter with your bot: Spezial:Diff/236539717/237997644 (6 edits in 10 days). This added to my negative surprise for yesterday’s bot action. — Speravir – 03:06, 12. Okt. 2023 (CEST)
For documentation: Here, too, the bot did not wait the period it should have according to its own configuration, especially at least one of these bot edits could have been avoided with a longer delay, even all of them with a delay longer than 10 hours:
— Speravir – 01:05, 13. Okt. 2023 (CEST)
I blocked the bot for now, please see [1]. -- aka 09:34, 12. Okt. 2023 (CEST)
I just undid this edit. There never was a broken section link. The respective anchor was within the template ((Kopfzeile Synchronisation)). Please add an exception for the link #Synchronisation
on pages with template Kopfzeile Synchronisation
…
Eiragorn Let's talk about... Flachkräcker 14:04, 17. Nov. 2023 (CET)
Hallo, siehe bitte https://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Vandalismusmeldung&oldid=240970304#Benutzer:Cewbot_(erl.) - hier läuft definitiv etwas schief. Mit der Bitte um Anpassung und Antwort, --JD {æ} 13:19, 8. Jan. 2024 (CET)
Hi, I don't know if you monitor all Cewbot discussion pages, I left a bug report here. Your bot does some misinterpreting which even results in edit wars with editors. --Windharp (Diskussion) 07:55, 7. Mai 2024 (CEST)