You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reasons:

This IP address has been blocked from editing Wikipedia.
This does not affect your ability to read Wikipedia pages.
Most people who see this message have done nothing wrong. Some kinds of blocks restrict editing from specific service providers or telecom companies in response to recent abuse or vandalism, and can sometimes affect other users who are unrelated to that abuse. Review the information below for assistance if you do not believe that you have done anything wrong.

The IP address or range 54.163.0.0/16 has been blocked (disabled) by ‪Blablubbs‬ for the following reason(s):

The IP address that you are currently using has been blocked because it is believed to be a web host provider or colocation provider. To prevent abuse, web hosts and colocation providers may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.
You will not be able to edit Wikipedia using a web host or colocation provider because it hides your IP address, much like a proxy or VPN.
We recommend that you attempt to use another connection to edit. For example, if you use a proxy or VPN to connect to the internet, turn it off when editing Wikipedia. If you edit using a mobile connection, try using a Wi-Fi connection, and vice versa. If you are using a corporate internet connection, switch to a different Wi-Fi network. If you have a Wikipedia account, please log in.
If you do not have any other way to edit Wikipedia, you will need to request an IP block exemption.

How to appeal if you are confident that your connection does not use a colocation provider's IP address:
If you are confident that you are not using a web host, you may appeal this block by adding the following text on your talk page: ((unblock|reason=Caught by a colocation web host block but this host or IP is not a web host. My IP address is _______. Place any further information here. ~~~~)). You must fill in the blank with your IP address for this block to be investigated. Your IP address can be determined here. Alternatively, if you wish to keep your IP address private you can use the unblock ticket request system. There are several reasons you might be editing using the IP address of a web host or colocation provider (such as if you are using VPN software or a business network); please use this method of appeal only if you think your IP address is in fact not a web host or colocation provider.

Administrators: The IP block exemption user right should only be applied to allow users to edit using web host in exceptional circumstances, and requests should usually be directed to the functionaries team via email. If you intend to give the IPBE user right, a CheckUser needs to take a look at the account. This can be requested most easily at SPI Quick Checkuser Requests. Unblocking an IP or IP range with this template is highly discouraged without at least contacting the blocking administrator.

This block will expire on 17:28, 10 March 2024.

Even when blocked, you will usually still be able to edit your user talk page, as well as email administrators and other editors.

For information on how to proceed, please read the FAQ for blocked users and the guideline on block appeals. The guide to appealing blocks may also be helpful.

Other useful links: Blocking policy · Help:I have been blocked
Your IP address is in a range that has been blocked on all Wikimedia Foundation wikis. The block was made by ‪Jon Kolbert‬. The reason given is Open proxy/Webhost: See the help page if you are affected .
- Start of block: 18:27, 12 November 2023
- Expiry of block: 18:27, 12 November 2028
Your current IP address is 54.163.179.242. The blocked range is 54.163.0.0/16. Please include all above details in any queries you make. If you believe you were blocked by mistake, you can find additional information and instructions in the No open proxies global policy. Otherwise, to discuss the block please post a request for review on Meta-Wiki. You could also send an email to the stewards VRT queue at stewards@wikimedia.org including all above details.

You can view and copy the source of this page:

((Short description|Collaborative research project))
((More citations needed|date=May 2019))
[[File:Cses globe.png|right]]
The '''Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (CSES)'''<ref name="auto3">((Cite web|url=https://cses.org/|title=Home - CSES|date=January 30, 2019|website=cses.org))</ref> is a collaborative research project among national election studies around the world.  Participating countries and polities include a common module of survey questions in their national post-election studies. The resulting data are collated together along with voting, demographic, district and macro variables into one dataset allowing comparative analysis of voting behavior from a multilevel perspective.

The CSES is published as a free, public dataset.<ref name="auto2">((Cite web|url=https://cses.org/data-download/|title=Download Data - CSES|date=March 12, 2019|website=cses.org))</ref> The project is administered by the CSES Secretariat, a joint effort between the Institute for Social Research at the [[University of Michigan]] and the [[GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences]] in Germany.

== Aims and content of the study ==

The CSES project was founded in 1994 with two major aims. The first was to promote international collaboration between national election studies. The second was to allow researchers to study variations in political institutions, especially electoral systems, and their effects on individual attitudes and behaviors, especially turnout and vote choice.

CSES datasets contain variables at three levels.  The first is micro-level variables which are answered by respondents during post-election surveys in each included country.  The second is district-level variables that contain election results from the electoral districts that survey respondents are situated in.  The third is macro-level variables containing information about the country context and electoral system, as well as aggregate data such as economic indicators and democracy indices. This nested data structure, as depicted in Figure 1, allows for multilevel analysis.

[[File:Multi-levelDataStructure.png|thumb|Figure 1: Visualization of CSES multilevel data structure]]

A new thematic module is devised by the CSES Planning Committee<ref name="auto">((Cite web|url=https://cses.org/about/planning-committee/|title=Planning Committee - CSES|date=March 29, 2019|website=cses.org))</ref> every five years. Between the final releases of the complete modules, CSES also disseminates advance releases of datasets periodically, which include partial data for modules that have not been fully released yet.
* Survey data collection for '''module 1''' was conducted between 1996 and 2001 and focuses on system performance. The module allows investigation of the impact of electoral institutions on citizens’ political cognition and behavior as well as of the nature of political and social cleavages and alignment. Furthermore, it enables research about citizens’ evaluation of democratic institutions and processes. Module 1 includes 39 election studies conducted in 33 countries.
* Survey data collection for '''module 2''' was conducted between 2001 and 2006 and focuses on accountability and representation. It addresses the contrast between the view that elections are a mechanism to hold government accountable and the view that they are a means to ensure that citizens’ views and interests are properly represented in the democratic process. Module 2 includes 41 election studies conducted in 38 countries.
* Survey data collection for '''module 3''' was conducted between 2006 and 2011. The module allows investigating the meaningfulness of electoral choices and, accordingly, focuses on a major aspect of electoral research: the contingency in choice of available options. Module 3 includes 50 election studies conducted in 41 countries.
* Survey data collection for '''module 4''' was conducted between 2011 and 2016 and focuses on distributional politics and social protection. The main topics investigated are voters’ preferences for public policy and the mediating factors of political institutions and voting behavior.<ref>((cite web|title=Partial source of text segments about module 1 to module 4 |url=http://www.gesis.org/en/services/data-analysis/survey-data/rdc-international-survey-programs/cses |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20170815024352/http://www.gesis.org/en/services/data-analysis/survey-data/rdc-international-survey-programs/cses |archivedate=2017-08-15 |accessdate=June 12, 2017))</ref>  Module 4 includes 45 election studies conducted in 39 countries.
* Survey data collection for '''module 5''' was conducted between 2016 and 2021 and focuses on the electorate's attitudes towards political elites, on the one hand, and towards "out groups", on the other hand. It thus enables research on attitudes and voting behavior in the context of a rise of parties campaigning on anti-establishment messages and in opposition to "out groups".<ref>((cite web|title=Partial source of text segment about module 5 |url=http://www.csesblog.org/2016/09/announcing-cses-module-5/ |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20170808154436/http://www.csesblog.org/2016/09/announcing-cses-module-5/ |archivedate=2017-08-08 |accessdate=June 12, 2017))</ref> Module 5 includes 56 election studies conducted in 45 countries.

A complete table of all variables available across modules can be found on the CSES website.

CSES also has an '''Integrated Module Dataset (IMD)''' which brings together the existing Standalone CSES Modules  (CSES Modules 1–4 inclusive) into one longitudinal and harmonized dataset. Variables that appear in at least three Standalone CSES Modules, up to and including CSES Module 5, are eligible for inclusion in IMD with all polities participating in CSES included in the dataset.

CSES IMD includes over 281,000 individual-level observations across 174 elections in 55 polities, with voter evaluations of over 600 political parties. Highlights of the IMD file is party and coalition numerical codes are synchronized across CSES Modules and the incorporation of data bridging variables allowing CSES data to be easily merged with other common datasets in the social sciences. CSES IMD launched in December 2018 and is being rolled out on a phased basis with the latest release, Phase 3 released in December 2020.

== Countries in the study ==
{| class="wikitable"
|-
!         !! Module 1 !! Module 2 !! Module 3 !! Module 4
!Module 5
|-
| ((flagicon|Albania)) [[Albania]] ||        ||2005||      ||
|2017
|-
| ((flagicon|Argentina)) [[Argentina]] || || || ||2015
|
|-
| ((flagicon|Australia)) [[Australia]] || 1996|| 2004|| 2007|| 2013
|2019
|-
| ((flagicon|Austria)) [[Austria]]|| || || 2008|| 2013
|2017
|-
| ((flagicon|Belarus)) [[Belarus]]|| 2001|| || 2008||
|
|-
| ((flagicon|Belgium)) [[Belgium]]|| 1999, 1999((efn|Two election studies were run in Belgium – one in Belgium-Flanders, and one in Belgium-Walloon|name=Belgium))|| 2003|| ||
|2019, 2019((efn|name=Belgium))
|-
| ((flagicon|Brazil)) [[Brazil]]|| || 2002|| 2006,2010|| 2014
|2018
|-
| ((flagicon|Bulgaria)) [[Bulgaria]]|| || 2001|| || 2014
|
|-
| ((flagicon|Canada)) [[Canada]]|| 1997|| 2004|| 2008|| 2011, 2015
|2019
|-
| ((flagicon|Chile)) [[Chile]]|| 1999|| 2005|| 2009||
|2017
|-
|((CRI))
|
|
|
|
|2018
|-
| ((flagicon|Croatia)) [[Croatia]]|| || || 2007||
|
|-
| ((flagicon|Czech Republic)) [[Czech Republic]]|| 1996|| 2002|| 2006,2010|| 2013
|2017,2021
|-
| ((flagicon|Denmark)) [[Denmark]]|| 1998|| 2001|| 2007||
|2019
|-
|((Flagicon|El Salvador)) [[El Salvador]]
|
|
|
|
|2019
|-
| ((flagicon|Estonia)) [[Estonia]]|| || || 2011||
|
|-
| ((flagicon|Finland)) [[Finland]]|| || 2003|| 2007,2011|| 2015
|2019
|-
| ((flagicon|France)) [[France]]|| || 2002|| 2007|| 2012
|2017
|-
| ((flagicon|Germany)) [[Germany]]|| 1998|| 2002, 2002((efn|Two election studies were run in Germany in 2002 – one was a telephone study, and one was a mail-back study.))|| 2005, 2009|| 2013
|2017,2021
|-
| ((flagicon|Great Britain)) [[Great Britain]]|| 1997|| 2005|| || 2015
|2017,2019
|-
| ((flagicon|Greece)) [[Greece]]|| || || 2009|| 2012, 2015
|2015,2019
|-
| ((flagicon|Hong Kong)) [[Hong Kong]]|| 1998, 2000|| 2004|| 2008|| 2012
|2016
|-
| ((flagicon|Hungary)) [[Hungary]]|| 1998|| 2002|| ||
|2018
|-
| ((flagicon|Iceland)) [[Iceland]]|| 1999|| 2003|| 2007, 2009|| 2013
|2016, 2017
|-
|((Flagicon|India)) [[India]]
|
|
|
|
|2019
|-
| ((flagicon|Ireland)) [[Ireland]]|| || 2002|| 2007|| 2011
|2016
|-
| ((flagicon|Israel)) [[Israel]]|| 1996|| 2003|| 2006|| 2013
|2020
|-
| ((flagicon|Italy)) [[Italy]]|| || 2006|| ||
|2018
|-
| ((flagicon|Japan)) [[Japan]]|| 1996|| 2004|| 2007|| 2013
|2017
|-
| ((flagicon|Kenya)) [[Kenya]]|| || || || 2013
|
|-
| ((flagicon|Kyrgyzstan)) [[Kyrgyzstan]]|| || 2005|| ||
|
|-
| ((flagicon|Latvia)) [[Latvia]]|| || || 2010|| 2011, 2014
|2018
|-
| ((flagicon|Lithuania)) [[Lithuania]]|| 1997|| || ||
|2016,2020
|-
| ((flagicon|Mexico)) [[Mexico]]|| 1997, 2000|| 2003|| 2006, 2009|| 2012,2015
|2018
|-
| ((flagicon|Montenegro)) [[Montenegro]]|| || || || 2012
|2016
|-
| ((flagicon|Netherlands)) [[Netherlands]]|| 1998|| 2002|| 2006,2010||
|2017,2021
|-
| ((flagicon|New Zealand)) [[New Zealand]]|| 1996|| 2002|| 2008|| 2011,2014
|2017,2020
|-
| ((flagicon|Norway)) [[Norway]]|| 1997|| 2001|| 2005, 2009|| 2013
|2017
|-
| ((flagicon|Peru)) [[Peru]]|| 2000, 2001|| 2006|| 2011|| 2016
|2021
|-
| ((flagicon|Philippines)) [[Philippines]]|| || 2004|| 2010|| 2016
|
|-
| ((flagicon|Poland)) [[Poland]]|| 1997|| 2001|| 2005, 2007|| 2011
|2019
|-
| ((flagicon|Portugal)) [[Portugal]]|| 2002((efn|name=Portugal|The Portugal 2002 election study occurred during the transition between module 1 and module 2, and included both modules.))|| 2002,((efn|name=Portugal)) 2005|| 2009|| 2015
|2019
|-
| ((flagicon|Romania)) [[Romania]]|| 1996|| 2004|| 2009|| 2012, 2014
|2016
|-
| ((flagicon|Russia)) [[Russia]]|| 1999,((efn|name=Russia|Russia 1999 and 2000: These two years were a panel study, with 1999 being for the parliamentary election and 2000 being for the presidential election.)) 2000((efn|name=Russia))|| 2004|| ||
|
|-
| ((flagicon|Serbia)) [[Serbia]]|| || || || 2012
|
|-
| ((flagicon|Slovakia)) [[Slovakia]]|| || || 2010|| 2016
|2020
|-
| ((flagicon|Slovenia)) [[Slovenia]]|| 1996|| 2004|| 2008|| 2011
|
|-
| ((flagicon|South Africa)) [[South Africa]]|| || || 2009|| 2014
|
|-
| ((flagicon|South Korea)) [[South Korea]]|| 2000|| 2004|| 2008|| 2012
|2016
|-
| ((flagicon|Spain)) [[Spain]]|| 1996, 2000|| 2004|| 2008||
|
|-
| ((flagicon|Sweden)) [[Sweden]]|| 1998|| 2002|| 2006|| 2014
|2018
|-
| ((flagicon|Switzerland)) [[Switzerland]]|| 1999|| 2003|| 2007|| 2011
|2019
|-
| ((flagicon|Taiwan)) [[Taiwan]]|| 1996|| 2001, 2004|| 2008|| 2012
|2016, 2020
|-
| ((flagicon|Thailand)) [[Thailand]]|| 2001|| || 2007|| 2011
|2019
|-
|((TUN))
|
|
|
|
|2019
|-
| ((flagicon|Turkey)) [[Turkey]]|| || || 2011|| 2015
|2018
|-
| ((flagicon|Ukraine)) [[Ukraine]]|| 1998|| || ||
|
|-
| ((flagicon|United States of America)) [[United States of America]]|| 1996|| 2004|| 2008|| 2012
|2016,2020
|-
| ((flagicon|Uruguay)) [[Uruguay]]|| || || 2009||
|2019
|}

A frequently updated election study table across all modules can be found on the CSES website.

== Data access ==

CSES data<ref name="auto2"/> are available publicly and are free of charge. Data releases are non-proprietary – in other words the data are made available to the public without preferential or advance access to anyone. Data is available in multiple formats including for common statistical packages like STATA, SPSS, SAS and R. The data can be downloaded from the CSES website as well as via the GESIS data catalogue. The GESIS online analysis tool ZACAT can furthermore be used to browse and explore the dataset.

== Organizational structure and funding ==

=== The CSES Secretariat ===

In conjunction with national election study collaborators, the CSES Secretariat<ref name="auto1">((Cite web|url=https://cses.org/about/cses-secretariat-staff/|title=CSES Secretariat - CSES|date=January 31, 2019|website=cses.org))</ref> administers the CSES project. It consists of staff from the [[GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences]] in Germany and the University of Michigan, Ann-Arbor in the United States. The Secretariat is responsible for compiling the final CSES dataset by harmonizing the single country studies into a cross-national dataset. It is also responsible for collecting the district and macro data, for data documentation, and for ensuring data quality. The Secretariat, furthermore, maintains the CSES website, promotes the project, provides support to the user community, and organizes conferences and project meetings.

=== The Planning Committee, collaborators and the CSES Plenary ===

The CSES research agenda, study design, and questionnaires are developed by an international committee of leading scholars in political science, sociology, and survey methodology. This committee is known as the CSES Planning Committee.<ref name="auto"/> At the beginning of each new module, a new Planning Committee is established. Nominations for the Planning Committee come from the user community, with membership of the Committee then being approved by the CSES Plenary Meeting. The Plenary Meeting is made up of national collaborators from each national election study involved in the CSES. Ideas for new modules can be submitted by anyone. More information on the current planning committee, its members, and subcommittee reports, as well as on past Planning Committees can be found on the CSES website. A list of country collaborators who participate in CSES can also be found on the CSES website.

=== Funding and support ===

The work of the CSES Secretariat<ref name="auto1"/> is funded by the American [[National Science Foundation]], the [[GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences]] and the [[University of Michigan]]’s Center for Political Studies along with in-kind support from participating election studies, additional organizations that sponsor planning meetings and conferences, and the many organizations that fund election studies by CSES collaborators.

== Klingemann Prize ==

Each year, the CSES awards the GESIS Klingemann Prize<ref>((Cite web|url=https://cses.org/results/klingemann-prize/|title=Klingemann Prize - CSES|date=July 7, 2020|website=cses.org))</ref> for the best CSES scholarship (paper, book, dissertation, or other scholarly work, broadly defined). The award is sponsored by the [[GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences]] and is named in honor of Professor ((ill|Dr. Hans-Dieter Klingemann|de|Hans-Dieter_Klingemann|vertical-align=sup)), co-founder of the CSES, an internationally renowned political scientist who made significant contributions to cross-national electoral research. Nominated works must make extensive use of CSES and have a publication date in the calendar year prior to the award, either in print or online.

===Winners of the Klingemann Prize===
* '''2023:''' James Adams (University of California, Davis), David Bracken (University of California, Davis), Noam Gidron (Hebrew University of Jerusalem), Will Horne (Georgia State University), Diana Z. O’Brien (Washington University in St. Louis) and Kaitlin Senk (Exeter University) (2022): ''Can’t We All Just Get Along? How Women MPs Can Ameliorate Affective Polarization in Western Publics.'' American Political Science Review, 117(1), 318–324.<ref>((Cite journal |last1=Adams |first1=James |last2=Bracken |first2=David |last3=Gidron |first3=Noam |last4=Horne |first4=Will |last5=O’brien |first5=Diana Z. |last6=Senk |first6=Kaitlin |date=February 2023 |title=Can't We All Just Get Along? How Women MPs Can Ameliorate Affective Polarization in Western Publics |journal=American Political Science Review |language=en |volume=117 |issue=1 |pages=318–324 |doi=10.1017/S0003055422000491 |issn=0003-0554|doi-access=free ))</ref>
* '''2022''': Vicente Valentim (University of Oxford) (2021): ''Parliamentary representation and the normalization of radical right support''. Comparative political studies, 54(14), 2475–2511.<ref>((Cite journal |last=Valentim |first=Vicente |date=December 2021 |title=Parliamentary Representation and the Normalization of Radical Right Support |url=http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0010414021997159 |journal=Comparative Political Studies |language=en |volume=54 |issue=14 |pages=2475–2511 |doi=10.1177/0010414021997159 |issn=0010-4140|hdl=1814/70696 |hdl-access=free ))</ref>
* '''2021:''' Enrique Hernández (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona), Eva Anduiza (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona) and Guillem Rico (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona) (2021): ''Affective polarization and the salience of elections''. Electoral Studies, 69(1), 1–9.<ref>((Cite journal |last1=Hernández |first1=Enrique |last2=Anduiza |first2=Eva |last3=Rico |first3=Guillem |date=February 2021 |title=Affective polarization and the salience of elections |url=https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S026137942030086X |journal=Electoral Studies |language=en |volume=69 |pages=102203 |doi=10.1016/j.electstud.2020.102203|s2cid=225243281 ))</ref>
* '''2020:''' Eelco Harteveld (University of Amsterdam), Stefan Dahlberg (University of Gothenburg), Andrej Kokkonen (Aarhus University) and Wouter Van Der Brug (University of Amsterdam) (2019). “Gender Differences in Vote Choice: Social Cues and Social Harmony as Heuristics”. British Journal of Political Science, 49(3), 1141–1161.<ref>((Cite journal |last1=Harteveld |first1=Eelco |last2=Dahlberg |first2=Stefan |last3=Kokkonen |first3=Andrej |last4=Van Der Brug |first4=Wouter |date=July 2019 |title=Gender Differences in Vote Choice: Social Cues and Social Harmony as Heuristics |url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0007123417000138/type/journal_article |journal=British Journal of Political Science |language=en |volume=49 |issue=3 |pages=1141–1161 |doi=10.1017/S0007123417000138 |s2cid=149204307 |issn=0007-1234))</ref>
* '''2019''': Ruth Dassonneville (University of Montreal) and Ian McAllister (Australian National University) (2018). "Gender, Political Knowledge, and Descriptive Representation: The Impact of Long-Term Socialization". American Journal of Political Science, 62(2), 249–265.<ref>((Cite journal |last1=Dassonneville |first1=Ruth |last2=McAllister |first2=Ian |date=April 2018 |title=Gender, Political Knowledge, and Descriptive Representation: The Impact of Long‐Term Socialization |url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajps.12353 |journal=American Journal of Political Science |language=en |volume=62 |issue=2 |pages=249–265 |doi=10.1111/ajps.12353 |issn=0092-5853))</ref>
* '''2018''': André Blais (University of Montreal), Eric Guntermann (University of Montreal) and Marc-André Bodet (University of Laval) (2017). "Linking Party Preferences and the Composition of Government: A New Standard for Evaluating the Performance of Electoral Democracy". Political Science Research and Methods, 5(2), 315–331.<ref>((Cite journal |last1=Blais |first1=André |last2=Guntermann |first2=Eric |last3=Bodet |first3=Marc A. |date=April 2017 |title=Linking Party Preferences and the Composition of Government: A New Standard for Evaluating the Performance of Electoral Democracy |url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2049847015000783/type/journal_article |journal=Political Science Research and Methods |language=en |volume=5 |issue=2 |pages=315–331 |doi=10.1017/psrm.2015.78 |s2cid=157367600 |issn=2049-8470))</ref>
* '''2017''': Dani Marinova (Autonomous University of Barcelona) (2016). "Coping with Complexity: How Voters Adapt to Unstable Parties". ECPR Press.
* '''2016''': Kasara Kimuli (Columbia University) and Pavithra Suryanarayan (Johns Hopkins University) (2015). "When Do the Rich Vote Less Than the Poor and Why? Explaining Turnout Inequality across the World". American Journal of Political Science, 59(3), 613–627.<ref>((Cite journal |last1=Kasara |first1=Kimuli |last2=Suryanarayan |first2=Pavithra |date=July 2015 |title=When Do the Rich Vote Less Than the Poor and Why? Explaining Turnout Inequality across the World |url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajps.12134 |journal=American Journal of Political Science |language=en |volume=59 |issue=3 |pages=613–627 |doi=10.1111/ajps.12134 |issn=0092-5853))</ref>
* '''2015''': Noam Lupu (University of Wisconsin-Madison) (2015). "Party Polarization and Mass Partisanship: A Comparative Perspective". Political Behavior, 37(2), 331–356.<ref>((Cite journal |last=Lupu |first=Noam |date=June 2015 |title=Party Polarization and Mass Partisanship: A Comparative Perspective |url=http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11109-014-9279-z |journal=Political Behavior |language=en |volume=37 |issue=2 |pages=331–356 |doi=10.1007/s11109-014-9279-z |s2cid=254936945 |issn=0190-9320))</ref>
* '''2014''': Richard R. Lau (Rutgers University), Parina Patel (Georgetown University), Dalia F. Fahmy (Long Island University) and Robert R. Kaufman (Rutgers University) (2014). "Correct Voting Across Thirty-Three Democracies: A Preliminary Analysis". British Journal of Political Science, 44(02), 239–259.<ref>((Cite journal |last1=Lau |first1=Richard R. |last2=Patel |first2=Parina |last3=Fahmy |first3=Dalia F. |last4=Kaufman |first4=Robert R. |date=April 2014 |title=Correct Voting Across Thirty-Three Democracies: A Preliminary Analysis |url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0007123412000610/type/journal_article |journal=British Journal of Political Science |language=en |volume=44 |issue=2 |pages=239–259 |doi=10.1017/S0007123412000610 |s2cid=153653179 |issn=0007-1234))</ref>
* '''2013''': Mark Andreas Kayser (Hertie School of Governance) and Michael Peress (University of Rochester) (2012). "Benchmarking across Borders: Electoral Accountability and the Necessity of Comparison". American Political Science Review, 106(03), 661–684.<ref>((Cite journal |last1=Kayser |first1=Mark Andreas |last2=Peress |first2=Michael |date=August 2012 |title=Benchmarking across Borders: Electoral Accountability and the Necessity of Comparison |url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0003055412000275/type/journal_article |journal=American Political Science Review |language=en |volume=106 |issue=3 |pages=661–684 |doi=10.1017/S0003055412000275 |s2cid=34325984 |issn=0003-0554))</ref>
* '''2012''': Russell J. Dalton (University of California, Irvine) David M. Farrell (University College Dublin) and Ian McAllister (Australian National University) (2011). "Political Parties and Democratic Linkage. How Parties Organize Democracy". Oxford University Press.
'''2011''': Matt Golder (Florida State University) and  Jacek Stramski (Florida State University) (2011). "Ideological Congruence and Electoral Institutions". American Journal of Political Science, 54(1), 90–106.<ref>((Cite journal |last1=Golder |first1=Matt |last2=Stramski |first2=Jacek |date=January 2010 |title=Ideological Congruence and Electoral Institutions |url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00420.x |journal=American Journal of Political Science |language=en |volume=54 |issue=1 |pages=90–106 |doi=10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00420.x))</ref>

== Notes ==
((notelist))

== References ==
((Reflist))

== External links ==
* [http://www.cses.org/ Comparative Study of Electoral Systems]
* ((cite web|url=http://www.gesis.org/unser-angebot/daten-analysieren/umfragedaten/cses/ |title=CSES at GESIS – Leibniz-Institute for the Social Sciences
|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20160427191551/http://www.gesis.org/unser-angebot/daten-analysieren/umfragedaten/cses/ |archivedate=2016-04-27 ))
* [https://cses.org/cses-blog/ CSES Blog]

((Social surveys))

[[Category:Political science]]
[[Category:Social research]]
[[Category:Social statistics data]]
[[Category:Statistical data sets]]

Pages transcluded onto the current version of this page (help):

Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (edit)
Template:Ambox (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:CRI (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Cite journal (view source) (protected)
Template:Cite web (view source) (protected)
Template:Country data Albania (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Country data Argentina (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Country data Armenia (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Country data Australia (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Country data Austria (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Country data Belarus (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Country data Belgium (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Country data Brazil (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Country data Bulgaria (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Country data Canada (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Country data Chile (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Country data Costa Rica (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Country data Croatia (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Country data Cuba (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Country data Cyprus (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Country data Czech Republic (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Country data Denmark (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Country data Ecuador (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Country data El Salvador (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Country data Estonia (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Country data Finland (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Country data France (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Country data Germany (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Country data Ghana (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Country data Great Britain (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Country data Greece (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Country data Hong Kong (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Country data Hungary (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Country data Iceland (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Country data India (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Country data Ireland (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Country data Israel (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Country data Italy (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Country data Jamaica (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Country data Japan (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Country data Kenya (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Country data Kyrgyzstan (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Country data Latvia (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Country data Lithuania (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Country data Luxembourg (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Country data Mexico (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Country data Montenegro (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Country data Netherlands (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Country data New Zealand (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Country data Norway (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Country data Paraguay (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Country data Peru (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Country data Philippines (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Country data Poland (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Country data Portugal (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Country data Romania (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Country data Russia (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Country data Serbia (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Country data Slovakia (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Country data Slovenia (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Country data South Africa (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Country data South Korea (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Country data Spain (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Country data Sweden (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Country data Switzerland (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Country data Taiwan (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Country data Thailand (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Country data Tunisia (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Country data Turkey (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Country data Ukraine (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Country data United States (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Country data United States of America (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Country data Uruguay (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Country data Vietnam (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Country data West Germany (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Efn (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Find sources mainspace (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Flagicon (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Flagicon/core (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Hlist/styles.css (view source) (protected)
Template:Ill (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Interlanguage link (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Main other (view source) (protected)
Template:More citations needed (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Navbox (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Notelist (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Pagetype (view source) (protected)
Template:Reflist (view source) (protected)
Template:Reflist/styles.css (view source) (protected)
Template:SDcat (view source) (protected)
Template:Separated entries (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Short description (view source) (protected)
Template:Short description/lowercasecheck (view source) (protected)
Template:Social surveys (edit)
Template:TUN (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Yesno (view source) (protected)
Template:Yesno-no (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Arguments (view source) (protected)
Module:Category handler (view source) (protected)
Module:Category handler/blacklist (view source) (protected)
Module:Category handler/config (view source) (protected)
Module:Category handler/data (view source) (protected)
Module:Category handler/shared (view source) (protected)
Module:Check for unknown parameters (view source) (protected)
Module:Citation/CS1 (view source) (protected)
Module:Citation/CS1/COinS (view source) (protected)
Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration (view source) (protected)
Module:Citation/CS1/Date validation (view source) (protected)
Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers (view source) (protected)
Module:Citation/CS1/Utilities (view source) (protected)
Module:Citation/CS1/Whitelist (view source) (protected)
Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css (view source) (protected)
Module:CountryData (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:CountryData/cacheG (view source) (extended confirmed protected)
Module:CountryData/summary (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Disambiguation/templates (view source) (protected)
Module:Find sources (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Find sources/config (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Find sources/links (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Find sources/templates/Find sources mainspace (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Flag (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Flagg (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Message box (view source) (protected)
Module:Message box/ambox.css (view source) (protected)
Module:Message box/configuration (view source) (protected)
Module:Namespace detect/config (view source) (protected)
Module:Namespace detect/data (view source) (protected)
Module:Navbar (view source) (protected)
Module:Navbar/configuration (view source) (protected)
Module:Navbar/styles.css (view source) (protected)
Module:Navbox (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Navbox/configuration (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Navbox/styles.css (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Pagetype (view source) (protected)
Module:Pagetype/config (view source) (protected)
Module:Pagetype/disambiguation (view source) (protected)
Module:Pagetype/setindex (view source) (protected)
Module:Pagetype/softredirect (view source) (protected)
Module:SDcat (view source) (protected)
Module:Separated entries (view source) (protected)
Module:String (view source) (protected)
Module:TableTools (view source) (protected)
Module:Unsubst (view source) (protected)
Module:Wikitext Parsing (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Yesno (view source) (protected)

Return to Comparative Study of Electoral Systems.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparative_Study_of_Electoral_Systems"