Matter waves are a central part of the theory of quantum mechanics, being an example of wave–particle duality. Empirically all matter in isolation exhibits wave-like behavior. For example, a beam of electrons can be diffracted just like a beam of light or a water wave. The vast number of interactions in the solids, liquids, and gases we interact with daily suppress this quantum wave behavior (see decoherence).

The concept that matter behaves like a wave was proposed by French physicist Louis de Broglie (/dəˈbrɔɪ/) in 1924.[1] It is also referred to as the de Broglie hypothesis.[2] Matter waves are referred to as de Broglie waves.

The de Broglie wavelength, λ, relates to matter's momentum, p, through the Planck constant, h:

.

This wavelength relationship holds for matter and for massless light when we use relativistic momentum for p.

Wave-like behavior of matter was first experimentally demonstrated by George Paget Thomson and Alexander Reid's thin metal diffraction experiment,[3] and independently in the Davisson–Germer experiment,[4][5] both using electrons; and it has also been confirmed for other elementary particles, neutral atoms and even molecules.

Example Matter Waves seen experimentally
matter mass kinetic energy wavelength reference
Electron 1/1823 Da 54 eV 167 pm Davisson–Germer_experiment
Electron 1/1823 Da 5e+04 eV 5 pm Tonomura [6]
Helium 4 Da 0.065 eV 56 pm Grisenti [7]
Na2 23 Da 0.00017 eV 459 pm Chapman [8]
C70 fullerene 841 Da 0.2 eV 2 pm Brezger [9]


Examples

Illustration of a matter wave in diffraction of electrons. Each black dot represents a single electron hitting a detector. When a large number of electrons have been detected, the pattern resembles that of a double-slit experiment.((Citation needed))

Electrons

Observations of diffraction provide direct evidence of wave properties. Before the de Broglie hypothesis in 1924,[1] small quanta with mass where thought to be "particles" or "corpusles". In 1927 at Bell Labs, Clinton Davisson and Lester Germer fired slow-moving electrons at a crystalline nickel target.[4][5] The angular dependence of the diffracted electron intensity was measured, and was determined to be similar to diffraction patterns predicted by Bragg for x-rays. At the same time George Paget Thomson and Alexander Reid at the University of Aberdeen were independently firing electrons at very thin metal foils to demonstrate the same effect.[3] When the de Broglie wavelength was inserted into the Bragg condition, structure similar to the experimental diffraction patterns were observed, thereby experimentally supporting the de Broglie hypothesis for electrons.[10] As also mentioned by Davisson and Germer,[5] this also supported the quantum mechanical formulation by Erwin Schrödinger[11]

This was a pivotal result in the development of quantum mechanics. Just as the photoelectric effect demonstrated the particle nature of light, these experiments showed the wave-nature of matter, and completed the theory of wave–particle duality. For physicists this idea was important because it meant that not only could any particle exhibit wave characteristics, but that one could use wave equations to describe phenomena in matter. This was confirmed quantitatively by Hans Bethe who published in 1928[12] the first formal description of electron diffraction based upon Schrödinger equation,[11] which is similar to how contemporary electron diffraction is described.[13][14]

Electrons escape from metals in an electrostatic field at energies less than classical predictions allow. Quantum tunneling explains the result as matter wave penetration of the work function barrier at the surface of the metal.[citation needed]

Neutral atoms

Numerous different kinds of experiments demonstrate or rely on wave properties of matter:

Molecules

Recent experiments even confirm the relations for molecules and even macromolecules that otherwise might be supposed too large to undergo quantum mechanical effects. In 1999, a research team in Vienna demonstrated diffraction for molecules as large as fullerenes.[23] The researchers calculated a De Broglie wavelength of the most probable C60 velocity as 2.5 pm. More recent experiments prove the quantum nature of molecules made of 810 atoms and with a mass of 10,123 u.[24] As of 2019, this has been pushed to molecules of 25,000 u.[25]

Scope of Matter Wave Behavior[clarification needed]

Empirically, as we see above, we can model the center of mass motion of isolated, bound matter using waves. Collisions with atoms and molecules or the emission or absorption of light degrade the observations[26], consistent with a transition from wave to particle models. The details of this transition process –-- quantum decoherence – remain unclear; this is an active area of research.[27]

To avoid decoherence, practical applications of matter wave isolate beams of matter within high vacuum chambers. Design of apparatus for matter waves however can proceed based on direct analogy to the physical optics of light waves. Up until the wave approaches some part of the apparatus it propagates as a free wave; massive particles, charged or not, obey the same equation in free space – the Helmholtz equation – as light. Differences only appear if we consider experimental scenarios where propagation speed matters, for example, the coincident measurement of two particles[28].

De Broglie relations

The de Broglie equations relate the wavelength λ to the momentum p, and frequency f to the total energy E of a free particle:[29]

where h is the Planck constant. The equations can also be written as

or [30]

where ħ = h/2π is the reduced Planck constant, k is the wave vector, β is the phase constant, and ω is the angular frequency.

In each pair, the second equation is also referred to as the Planck–Einstein relation, since it was also proposed by Planck and Einstein.

Special relativity

Using two formulas from special relativity, one for the relativistic mass energy and one for the relativistic momentum[citation needed]

allows the de Broglie equations to be written as

where denotes the particle's rest mass, its velocity, the Lorentz factor, and the speed of light in vacuum.[31][32][33] See below for details of the derivation of the de Broglie relations.

Group velocity

Albert Einstein first explained the wave–particle duality of light in 1905. Louis de Broglie hypothesized that any particle should also exhibit such a duality. The velocity of a particle, he concluded, should always equal the group velocity of the corresponding wave and not the phase velocity. The magnitude of the group velocity is equal to the particle's speed; the phase velocity equals the product of the particle's frequency and its wavelength.

Both in relativistic and non-relativistic quantum physics, we can identify the group velocity of a particle's wave function with the particle velocity. Quantum mechanics has very accurately demonstrated this hypothesis, and the relation has been shown explicitly for particles as large as molecules.[23]

De Broglie deduced that if the duality equations already known for light were the same for any particle, then his hypothesis would hold. This means that

where E is the total energy of the particle, p is its momentum, ħ is the reduced Planck constant. For a free non-relativistic particle it follows that

where m is the mass of the particle and v its velocity.[clarification needed]

Also in special relativity we find that

where m0 is the rest mass of the particle and c is the speed of light in vacuum. But (see below), using that the phase velocity is vp = E/p = c2/v, therefore

where v is the velocity of the particle regardless of wave behavior.

Phase velocity[clarification needed]

In quantum mechanics, particles also behave as waves with complex phases. The phase velocity is equal to the product of the frequency multiplied by the wavelength. In the case of a non-dispersive medium, the phase velocity equals the group velocity; otherwise they are not equal.

By the de Broglie hypothesis, we see that

Using relativistic relations for energy and momentum, we have

where E is the total energy of the particle (i.e., rest energy plus kinetic energy in the kinematic sense), p the momentum, the Lorentz factor, c the speed of light, and β the speed as a fraction of c. The variable v can either be taken to be the speed of the particle or the group velocity of the corresponding matter wave. Since the particle speed for any particle that has mass (according to special relativity), the phase velocity of matter waves always exceeds c, i.e.,

and as we can see, it approaches c when the particle speed is in the relativistic range. The superluminal phase velocity does not violate special relativity, because phase propagation carries no energy. See the article on Dispersion (optics) for details.

Four-vectors

Using four-vectors, the De Broglie relations form a single equation: which is frame-independent.

Likewise, the relation between group/particle velocity and phase velocity is given in frame-independent form by: where

History[clarification needed]

The concept that matter behaves like a wave was initially proposed by French physicist Louis de Broglie in his 1924 PhD thesis.[1] The De Broglie hypothesis had widespread impact on early quantum theory.

Erwin Schrödinger picking up de Broglie's hypothesis,[11] applied Hamilton's optico-mechanical analogy to derive his eponymous wave equation. That is, he reasoned that "the failure of classical physics to account for quantum phenomena is analogous to the failure of geometrical optics to account for interference and diffraction: and he proposed to create in connection with de Broglie waves a theory analogous to Physical Optics".[34] The many optical applications of matter waves bears out this historical connection.

Matter waves were first experimentally confirmed to occur in George Paget Thomson and Alexander Reid's electron diffraction experiment[3] and the Davisson-Germer experiment for electrons.[4][5] The de Broglie hypothesis has been confirmed for other elementary particles. Furthermore, neutral atoms and even molecules have been shown to be wave-like.

See also

References

  1. ^ a b c de Broglie, Louis Victor. "On the Theory of Quanta". Foundation of Louis de Broglie (English translation by A.F. Kracklauer, 2004. ed.). Retrieved 25 February 2023.
  2. ^ Feynman, R., QED: The Strange Theory of Light and Matter, Penguin 1990 Edition, p. 84.
  3. ^ a b c Thomson, G. P.; Reid, A. (1927). "Diffraction of Cathode Rays by a Thin Film". Nature. 119 (3007): 890. Bibcode:1927Natur.119Q.890T. doi:10.1038/119890a0. ISSN 0028-0836. S2CID 4122313.
  4. ^ a b c Davisson, C.; Germer, L. H. (1927). "Diffraction of Electrons by a Crystal of Nickel". Physical Review. 30 (6): 705–740. Bibcode:1927PhRv...30..705D. doi:10.1103/physrev.30.705. ISSN 0031-899X.
  5. ^ a b c d Davisson, C. J.; Germer, L. H. (1928). "Reflection of Electrons by a Crystal of Nickel". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 14 (4): 317–322. Bibcode:1928PNAS...14..317D. doi:10.1073/pnas.14.4.317. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 1085484. PMID 16587341.
  6. ^ "Tonomura, Akira, et al. "Demonstration of single‐electron buildup of an interference pattern." American Journal of Physics 57.2 (1989): 117-120."
  7. ^ "Grisenti, R. E., et al. "He-atom diffraction from nanostructure transmission gratings: The role of imperfections." Physical Review A 61.3 (2000): 033608."
  8. ^ Chapman, Michael S., et al. "Optics and interferometry with Na 2 molecules." Physical review letters 74.24 (1995): 4783.
  9. ^ Brezger, B.; Hackermüller, L.; Uttenthaler, S.; Petschinka, J.; Arndt, M.; Zeilinger, A. (February 2002). "Matter–Wave Interferometer for Large Molecules" (reprint). Physical Review Letters. 88 (10): 100404. arXiv:quant-ph/0202158. Bibcode:2002PhRvL..88j0404B. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.100404. PMID 11909334. S2CID 19793304. Archived (PDF) from the original on 13 August 2007. Retrieved 30 April 2007.
  10. ^ Mauro Dardo, Nobel Laureates and Twentieth-Century Physics, Cambridge University Press 2004, pp. 156–157
  11. ^ a b c Schrödinger, E. (1926). "An Undulatory Theory of the Mechanics of Atoms and Molecules". Physical Review. 28 (6): 1049–1070. Bibcode:1926PhRv...28.1049S. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.28.1049. ISSN 0031-899X.
  12. ^ Bethe, H. (1928). "Theorie der Beugung von Elektronen an Kristallen". Annalen der Physik (in German). 392 (17): 55–129. Bibcode:1928AnP...392...55B. doi:10.1002/andp.19283921704.
  13. ^ John M., Cowley (1995). Diffraction physics. Elsevier. ISBN 0-444-82218-6. OCLC 247191522.
  14. ^ Peng, L.-M.; Dudarev, S. L.; Whelan, M. J. (2011). High energy electron diffraction and microscopy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-960224-7. OCLC 656767858.
  15. ^ F. Shimizu (2000). "Specular Reflection of Very Slow Metastable Neon Atoms from a Solid Surface". Physical Review Letters. 86 (6): 987–990. Bibcode:2001PhRvL..86..987S. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.987. PMID 11177991. S2CID 34195829.
  16. ^ D. Kouznetsov; H. Oberst (2005). "Reflection of Waves from a Ridged Surface and the Zeno Effect". Optical Review. 12 (5): 1605–1623. Bibcode:2005OptRv..12..363K. doi:10.1007/s10043-005-0363-9. S2CID 55565166.
  17. ^ H.Friedrich; G.Jacoby; C.G.Meister (2002). "quantum reflection by Casimir–Van der Waals potential tails". Physical Review A. 65 (3): 032902. Bibcode:2002PhRvA..65c2902F. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.65.032902.
  18. ^ R.B.Doak; R.E.Grisenti; S.Rehbein; G.Schmahl; J.P.Toennies; Ch. Wöll (1999). "Towards Realization of an Atomic de Broglie Microscope: Helium Atom Focusing Using Fresnel Zone Plates". Physical Review Letters. 83 (21): 4229–4232. Bibcode:1999PhRvL..83.4229D. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.4229.
  19. ^ Koch, Markus, et al. "Imaging with neutral atoms—a new matter‐wave microscope." Journal of microscopy 229.1 (2008): 1-5.
  20. ^ Barr, M., et al. "Unlocking new contrast in a scanning helium microscope." Nature communications 7.1 (2016): 10189.
  21. ^ Akbari, Kamran, Valerio Di Giulio, and F. Javier García de Abajo. "Optical manipulation of matter waves." Science Advances 8.42 (2022): eabq2659.
  22. ^ Pierre Cladé; Changhyun Ryu; Anand Ramanathan; Kristian Helmerson; William D. Phillips (2008). "Observation of a 2D Bose Gas: From thermal to quasi-condensate to superfluid". Physical Review Letters. 102 (17): 170401. arXiv:0805.3519. Bibcode:2009PhRvL.102q0401C. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.170401. PMID 19518764. S2CID 19465661.
  23. ^ a b Arndt, M.; O. Nairz; J. Voss-Andreae; C. Keller; G. van der Zouw; A. Zeilinger (14 October 1999). "Wave-particle duality of C60". Nature. 401 (6754): 680–682. Bibcode:1999Natur.401..680A. doi:10.1038/44348. PMID 18494170. S2CID 4424892.
  24. ^ Eibenberger, Sandra; Gerlich, Stefan; Arndt, Markus; Mayor, Marcel; Tüxen, Jens (14 August 2013). "Matter–wave interference of particles selected from a molecular library with masses exceeding 10 000 amu". Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics. 15 (35): 14696–700. arXiv:1310.8343. Bibcode:2013PCCP...1514696E. doi:10.1039/c3cp51500a. ISSN 1463-9084. PMID 23900710. S2CID 3944699.
  25. ^ "2000 atoms in two places at once: A new record in quantum superposition". phys.org. Retrieved 25 September 2019.
  26. ^ Cronin, Alexander D., Jörg Schmiedmayer, and David E. Pritchard. "Optics and interferometry with atoms and molecules." Reviews of Modern Physics 81.3 (2009): 1051.
  27. ^ A bot will complete this citation soon. Click here to jump the queue arXiv:[1].
  28. ^ Brukner, Časlav, and Anton Zeilinger. "Nonequivalence between stationary matter wave optics and stationary light optics." Physical review letters 79.14 (1997): 2599.
  29. ^ Resnick, R.; Eisberg, R. (1985). Quantum Physics of Atoms, Molecules, Solids, Nuclei and Particles (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-0-471-87373-0.
  30. ^ Z.Y.Wang (2016). "Generalized momentum equation of quantum mechanics". Optical and Quantum Electronics. 48 (2). doi:10.1007/s11082-015-0261-8. S2CID 124732329.
  31. ^ Holden, Alan (1971). Stationary states. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-501497-6.
  32. ^ Williams, W.S.C. (2002). Introducing Special Relativity, Taylor & Francis, London, ISBN 0-415-27761-2, p. 192.
  33. ^ De Broglie, Louis (1970). "The reinterpretation of wave mechanics". Foundations of Physics. 1 (1): 5–15. Bibcode:1970FoPh....1....5D. doi:10.1007/BF00708650. S2CID 122931010.
  34. ^ See the final chapter in A_History_of_the_Theories_of_Aether_and_Electricity#Overview_(vol._2) (links of course added)

Further reading