3 October 2010

• 13:0413:04, 3 October 2010 diff hist +13‎ Iran–Iraq War ‎ tactical failure was from both parts

19 August 2010

• 09:3909:39, 19 August 2010 diff hist −373‎ Anahita ‎ This article contains numerous copies of the text on Anahita on the Iranica Encyclopedia. If you don't want to get sued i suggest removing those and rewriting this article immediately.
• 09:3609:36, 19 August 2010 diff hist +388‎ Talk:Anahita ‎ →‎Copies of Iranica text: new section

12 July 2010

• 15:2215:22, 12 July 2010 diff hist +7‎ Zack Snyder ‎No edit summary
• 15:1415:14, 12 July 2010 diff hist +7‎ Mark Canton ‎No edit summary

11 July 2010

• 23:1123:11, 11 July 2010 diff hist +261‎ Talk:David Duke ‎ →‎Sue Wikipeida: new section

29 June 2010

• 07:0207:02, 29 June 2010 diff hist +99‎ Talk:List of converts to Islam ‎ →‎Welcome to Wikipedia: new section

25 June 2010

• 20:0220:02, 25 June 2010 diff hist +733‎ User talk:Xashaiar ‎ →‎Sepaas: new section
• 19:2119:21, 25 June 2010 diff hist −5‎ Talk:Babak Khorramdin ‎ →‎Born in Iran
• 19:1919:19, 25 June 2010 diff hist +951‎ Talk:Babak Khorramdin ‎ →‎Born in Iran: new section
• 19:0019:00, 25 June 2010 diff hist +8‎ Parthian Empire ‎ Its called middle persian or Pahlavi not middle iranian. This article needs more Iranian editors if there are any left unbanned, parthians were the successors of the achaemenids not the selecuids.
• 18:0018:00, 25 June 2010 diff hist +283‎ User talk:Babakexorramdin ‎ →‎Outing
• 17:5017:50, 25 June 2010 diff hist +1,602‎ Talk:Greater Iran ‎ →‎A message to the Iranians: new section

13 June 2010

• 22:4022:40, 13 June 2010 diff hist −21‎ Asieh Namdar ‎ she grew up in Iran, and has Iranian parents, that makes her Iranian-american not pakistani-american, all hail wakipedia

30 March 2010

• 15:3215:32, 30 March 2010 diff hist +92‎ User talk:Babakexorramdin ‎ →‎119.73.12.45
• 15:3015:30, 30 March 2010 diff hist +959‎ User talk:Babakexorramdin ‎ →‎119.73.12.45: new section
• 15:0315:03, 30 March 2010 diff hist +318‎ Template talk:History of Greater Iran sidebar ‎ →‎This template is ridiculous
• 14:5914:59, 30 March 2010 diff hist +776‎ User talk:119.73.3.72 ‎No edit summary
• 14:5214:52, 30 March 2010 diff hist −1,722‎ Battle of Damghan (1729) ‎ Undid revision 351833812 by 119.73.12.45 (talk)rv pov by banned user nisarkand
• 14:4714:47, 30 March 2010 diff hist −1‎ User talk:Arad ‎ →‎Greetings
• 14:4614:46, 30 March 2010 diff hist +174‎ User talk:Arad ‎ →‎Greetings
• 14:3614:36, 30 March 2010 diff hist +52‎ User talk:119.73.13.24 ‎No edit summary
• 14:3514:35, 30 March 2010 diff hist +3‎ User talk:119.73.13.24 ‎No edit summary
• 14:3214:32, 30 March 2010 diff hist −819‎ Hotak dynasty ‎ rv POV. nader didnt enlist any afghan, he defeated them and forced them to fight for him. why would any king befriend a people he just defeated
• 01:2101:21, 30 March 2010 diff hist +923‎ N User talk:119.73.13.24 ‎ ←Created page with 'It is you that need to show proof for your claims little friend. Afghans constantly try to say they didnt get defeated up by nader shah and try to use the use of so...'
• 01:0601:06, 30 March 2010 diff hist −930‎ User talk:82.209.159.184 ‎ ←Blanked the page

24 March 2010

• 16:5916:59, 24 March 2010 diff hist +770‎ User talk:Arad ‎ →‎Greetings: new section
• 16:4516:45, 24 March 2010 diff hist −8‎ Achaemenid Empire ‎No edit summary
• 16:4116:41, 24 March 2010 diff hist +1,675‎ Template talk:History of Greater Iran sidebar ‎ →‎This template is ridiculous: new section
• 15:5215:52, 24 March 2010 diff hist +228‎ N User talk:119.73.3.72 ‎ ←Created page with 'Before worrying about prostitution in iran, worry about prostitution in your own country afghanistan. Pashto women are selling themselves all over in middle east, s...'
• 10:2610:26, 24 March 2010 diff hist −20‎ User talk:82.209.159.184 ‎ rv vandalizer
• 10:2410:24, 24 March 2010 diff hist +149‎ Hotak dynasty ‎ Undid revision 351370933 by 119.73.15.225 (talk) Where in the article does it say reconquor? it was my statement and yes he did that

9 March 2010

• 19:4419:44, 9 March 2010 diff hist −135‎ Rumi ‎ →‎Legacy
• 19:4319:43, 9 March 2010 diff hist −309‎ Rumi ‎ →‎Legacy: This would suggest he was not a persian, but just a persian speaker, which of course whoever put this here knew and did it on purpose Tag: references removed

8 March 2010

• 17:1017:10, 8 March 2010 diff hist +1‎ User talk:Babakexorramdin ‎ →‎Persian People
• 17:0917:09, 8 March 2010 diff hist +695‎ User talk:Babakexorramdin ‎ →‎Persian People: new section
• 16:0216:02, 8 March 2010 diff hist +149‎ Hotak dynasty ‎ Nader didnt push the afghans back, he reconquered them as was stated in the original article until nisarkand changed it.

18 February 2010

• 17:4717:47, 18 February 2010 diff hist +342‎ Talk:Slavery in Iran ‎ →‎yet another article under the hands of "any editor with self opinions".
• 17:4217:42, 18 February 2010 diff hist −45‎ Slavery in Iran ‎ →‎Under the Sassanids: another lie about "being widely used"
• 17:4017:40, 18 February 2010 diff hist +562‎ Talk:Slavery in Iran ‎ →‎yet another article under the hands of "any editor with self opinions".: new section
• 17:3217:32, 18 February 2010 diff hist −296‎ Slavery in Iran ‎ →‎Modern Period: britain was the top source of slavery even in that time, they ask persia to demolish it? haha Tag: references removed
• 17:3117:31, 18 February 2010 diff hist −24‎ Slavery in Iran ‎ →‎Arab slave trade: persians were not involved in any slavery at the time of arab occupation. want to add it? show source, not imaginable source
• 17:2417:24, 18 February 2010 diff hist +17‎ Slavery in ancient Greece ‎ thats a lie, there was no slavery in persia, that fact wont change no matter how many articles you write in this laughable thing called wikipedia.

22 January 2010

• 19:0019:00, 22 January 2010 diff hist −300‎ Talk:Muslim conquest of Persia ‎ →‎deletion2
• 18:5518:55, 22 January 2010 diff hist +675‎ Talk:Muslim conquest of Persia ‎ lies