09:2609:26, 17 February 2022diffhist−309
Anti-Judaism
→Contrasted with antisemitism: Googlescholar search of Nirenberg's book uncovers no use of "Jew-hate"; peacock term added by editor. The concept of strawman is not mentioned nor "imaginary Jew". Need a page number to support this edit. Removing this sentence.
08:4008:40, 22 August 2021diffhist−174
Abraham
"After a century of exhaustive archaeological investigation, no evidence has been found for a historical Abraham." which means there is no resting place for a literary figure.
07:0807:08, 22 August 2021diffhist+44
Abraham
repairing edit by User:SoaringLL in this edit: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Abraham&diff=next&oldid=1027296231] who must have acccidently pulled the text while reverting another section which had nothing to do with the lede.Tag: Reverted
09:0609:06, 6 June 2021diffhist+44
Abraham
Undid revision 1023239732 by FriendofRafid (talk) WP:Lede: "The lead section (also known as the lead or introduction) of a Wikipedia article is the section before the table of contents and the first heading. The lead serves as an introduction to the article and a '''summary of its most important contents'''".Tag: Undo
06:0606:06, 13 May 2021diffhist+12
Cave of the Patriarchs
→Etymology of "Machpelah": again, theories are established from postulating from hypothesis, creating experiments, gathering confirmational data from the experiments then the data must be independently verified by different research groups. These are hypothesis that were not tested extensively
05:5205:52, 13 May 2021diffhist+44
Abraham
"beginning of the 21st century, archaeologists had given up hope of recovering any context that would make Abraham, Isaac or Jacob credible historical figures" He is not based in scientific established history. This is sourced. According to Wikipedia:lede critical points must be summarizedTag: Reverted
5 May 2021
04:0304:03, 5 May 2021diffhist+13
Abraham
Undid revision 1020089022 by Fanardal (talk)"beginning of the 21st century, archaeologists had given up hope of recovering any context that would make Abraham, Isaac or Jacob credible historical figures" He is mythological. A literary construct according to sources in the article and by Wikipedia:lede critical points must be summarizedTag: Undo
03:1903:19, 5 May 2021diffhist+8 m
Cave of the Patriarchs
→Etymology of "Machpelah": you are using the word inaccurately. From Theory "The word theory or "in theory" is sometimes used erroneously by people to explain something which they individually did not experience or test before.[5] In those instances, semantically, it is being substituted for another concept, a hypothesis. Instead of using the word "hypothetically", it is replaced by a phrase: "in theory". "Tag: Reverted
21:2321:23, 4 May 2021diffhist+501
Cave of the Patriarchs
There is no evidence for his existence and this is an appropriate place to mention this. The article reads as if his existence is assumed true. Somewhere in this article; the lack of evidence must be mentioned. Readers of this article are being mislead if they come away believing actual bones of Abraham, Isaac, Sarah or Jacob are buried here.Tag: Reverted