13:1413:14, 21 April 2024diffhist−161
Women's National Basketball Association
We had a discussion on the talk page, and it basically ended with the ip saying he/she wasn’t willing to do the heavy lifting of finding a preponderance of reliable secondary sources to justify this inclusion. So for now there’s no reason for it to stay in if it isn’t being supported by RSesTags: Manual revertMobile editMobile web edit
14:0414:04, 20 April 2024diffhist−161
Women's National Basketball Association
Not strong enough evidence. Nicknames are not the same as alternative names. Only alternative names belong here if any. You don’t see MLB article saying also known as “the big leagues” or NBA article saying also known as “the league” even though those are popular nicknamesTags: RevertedMobile editMobile web edit
01:4001:40, 10 April 2024diffhist−33
Nazism
Of course I agree nazism is far-right, but I can’t think of any reason that is the first most important thing to say about it other than to make a contemporary political point. We already say it at the bottom of the lead paragraph like we do for Marxism, and the other closest parallel of Stalinism has no parallel language, and this seems like the right approach in terms of making the most precise possible description in the context of the times these philosophies became extant. people...Tags: RevertedMobile editMobile web edit
14:2114:21, 26 March 2024diffhist−1,724
Cru (Christian organization)
→Criticism: Consolidate repetitive and unnecessary info in description of controversy and remove rebuttal that is about Christianity generally and not specifically discussed in reference to article subject in sourcesTags: Mobile editMobile web edit
01:1701:17, 18 March 2024diffhist−63
Nicole Shanahan
NPOV. Would you use this adjective in an article about a completely different person to introduce him if he were a presidential candidate from the 19th century?Tags: RevertedMobile editMobile web edit