10 January 2020
- 01:0601:06, 10 January 2020 diff hist +151 Roger Staubach →Legacy and accolades: Correcting text and adding source. Graham's number includes his AAFC stats, a completely different league with inflated numbers. His NFL-only rating was lower.
19 December 2019
- 06:3106:31, 19 December 2019 diff hist +29 Drew Pearson (American football) →Professional career: Fixing vandalism.
17 November 2019
- 01:5401:54, 17 November 2019 diff hist +1,229 Talk:Stephen Miller (political advisor) →Vandalized with Political Opinion: Reply. The current version is not encyclopedic and gravely violates Wikipedia's policies on potentially defamatory biographical material.
26 February 2019
- 22:4622:46, 26 February 2019 diff hist +3,247 Talk:Conservatism in the United States →Endorsing removal of "emphasize the importance of virtue in society": Reply. This easy fix addresses your professed concern. Now please address the ones raised about the current skewed, POV text.
25 February 2019
- 19:1519:15, 25 February 2019 diff hist +21 Conservatism in the United States More appropriate link.
- 18:5918:59, 25 February 2019 diff hist −34 Conservatism in the United States Streamlining unwieldy sentence with undue emphasis on niche, specific issues into a topline summary appropriate for the lead. We don't mention other specific issues like gun control, social security, estate tax etc. in the lead.These issues are more properly covered with nuanced detail in the body.
24 February 2019
- 21:3121:31, 24 February 2019 diff hist +1,750 Talk:Conservatism in the United States →Ongoing attempt to make non-standard claims.: Reply.
- 21:0421:04, 24 February 2019 diff hist +943 Talk:Conservatism in the United States →"Require school prayer"? The source doesn't support that language.: Reply.
- 20:5020:50, 24 February 2019 diff hist +1,592 Talk:Conservatism in the United States →"Require school prayer"? The source doesn't support that language.: Our personal policy preferences and speculation on impact don't matter here. Neutral descriptions supported by sources do. Also - compromise suggestion.
23 February 2019
- 20:5920:59, 23 February 2019 diff hist −1 m Talk:Conservatism in the United States →Ongoing attempt to make non-standard claims.
- 20:4520:45, 23 February 2019 diff hist +92 Talk:Conservatism in the United States →Ongoing attempt to make non-standard claims.: Update. Actually it was even worse.
- 20:3220:32, 23 February 2019 diff hist +1,245 Talk:Conservatism in the United States →Ongoing attempt to make non-standard claims.: This isn't a legitimate talk page section but a political rant. You don't link to a single example or cite a single source in this rambling, NPOV diatribe.
- 20:0920:09, 23 February 2019 diff hist +6 m Talk:Conservatism in the United States →"Require school prayer"? The source doesn't support that language.
- 20:0720:07, 23 February 2019 diff hist +5,337 Talk:Conservatism in the United States →"Require school prayer"? The source doesn't support that language.: Reply. Lots of more sources.
- 19:0619:06, 23 February 2019 diff hist +680 Talk:Conservatism in the United States →Edit Break - the big ideologically divisive issues are new: Being so strident in your political bias that you find discussion with "libertarians", a vast category of people, "pointless", isn't conducive to NPOV editing.
- 18:5418:54, 23 February 2019 diff hist +684 Conservatism in the United States Exactly. But I'm guessing you meant to say the opposite in your edit summary. Reverting unwarranted deletion of two reliable sources emphasizing the repeated attempts by the conservative movement to have "voluntary" prayer allowed. The current, false claim has no sourcing and violates NPOV.
- 11:1311:13, 23 February 2019 diff hist +1,246 Talk:Conservatism in the United States →is Conservatism the same as Libertarianism: Comment. Yet another source and quote.
- 10:2510:25, 23 February 2019 diff hist +334 Conservatism in the United States The recent change to this sentence left it grammatically and substantively incorrect. Reverting and adding a source.
- 09:5609:56, 23 February 2019 diff hist −6 m Conservatism in the United States No edit summary
- 09:5309:53, 23 February 2019 diff hist −16 m Conservatism in the United States No edit summary
- 09:5009:50, 23 February 2019 diff hist +706 Conservatism in the United States Correcting unsourced, false claim and adding sources.
- 07:5407:54, 23 February 2019 diff hist +2,361 Talk:Conservatism in the United States →Edit Break - the big ideologically divisive issues are new: Reply. Old news. And irrelevant.
- 01:5301:53, 23 February 2019 diff hist +914 Talk:Conservatism in the United States →Edit Break - the big ideologically divisive issues are new: Reply.
22 February 2019
- 22:4722:47, 22 February 2019 diff hist −1 m Talk:Conservatism in the United States →Edit Break - the big ideologically divisive issues are new
- 22:3822:38, 22 February 2019 diff hist +1,256 Talk:Conservatism in the United States →Edit Break - the big ideologically divisive issues are new: Get the history right. Jefferson was hostile to taxation and late 19th Century "progressive" literature acknowledged and celebrated the ideological break from the "old constitutional order" and the "conservative ascendancy".
21 February 2019
- 22:1922:19, 21 February 2019 diff hist +489 Talk:Conservatism in the United States →Edit Break - the big ideologically divisive issues are new: Reply.
20 February 2019
- 21:2621:26, 20 February 2019 diff hist −40 Conservatism in the United States →Overview: Tweaking sentence for accuracy and moving it to a more logical place in the section since it represents unified conservative sentiment rather than a particular subgroup.
- 19:5919:59, 20 February 2019 diff hist +4,856 Talk:Conservatism in the United States →Edit Break - the big ideologically divisive issues are new: Replies.
19 February 2019
- 22:2322:23, 19 February 2019 diff hist +467 Talk:Conservatism in the United States →American conservatives often support social regulation and policies that increase the national debt: Reply. "homicide" is morally neutral and may be justified or unjustified.
- 22:0922:09, 19 February 2019 diff hist +1,065 Talk:Conservatism in the United States →isues of 2019 go back 2 centuries--there was never a 19c common consensus on unions, race, immigrants, big biz, etc: Edit Break - the big ideologically divisive issues are new
- 00:2200:22, 19 February 2019 diff hist +125 Talk:Conservatism in the United States →is Conservatism the same as Libertarianism: Addition.
- 00:2000:20, 19 February 2019 diff hist +249 Talk:Conservatism in the United States →is Conservatism the same as Libertarianism: Addition.
- 00:1200:12, 19 February 2019 diff hist −4 m Talk:Conservatism in the United States →is Conservatism the same as Libertarianism
- 00:1100:11, 19 February 2019 diff hist +1,194 Talk:Conservatism in the United States →is Conservatism the same as Libertarianism: Comment and quotes.
18 February 2019
- 23:5823:58, 18 February 2019 diff hist +118 Talk:Conservatism in the United States →American conservatives often support social regulation and policies that increase the national debt: Source.
- 23:5623:56, 18 February 2019 diff hist +2,545 Talk:Conservatism in the United States →American conservatives often support social regulation and policies that increase the national debt: Reply.
- 23:1423:14, 18 February 2019 diff hist +9,371 Talk:Conservatism in the United States It also helps to read the sources. Reply.
- 09:5409:54, 18 February 2019 diff hist +1,579 Talk:Conservatism in the United States →isues of 2019 go back 2 centuries--there was never a 19c common consensus on unions, race, immigrants, big biz, etc: Reply.
- 08:5708:57, 18 February 2019 diff hist −3 m Talk:Conservatism in the United States →isues of 2019 go back 2 centuries--there was never a 19c common consensus on unions, race, immigrants, big biz, etc
- 08:5408:54, 18 February 2019 diff hist +3 Talk:Conservatism in the United States →isues of 2019 go back 2 centuries--there was never a 19c common consensus on unions, race, immigrants, big biz, etc
- 08:4808:48, 18 February 2019 diff hist +1,317 Talk:Conservatism in the United States →"Require school prayer"? The source doesn't support that language.: Reply.
- 08:3208:32, 18 February 2019 diff hist +551 Talk:Conservatism in the United States →American conservatives often support more spending and social regulation: Reply.
- 08:2608:26, 18 February 2019 diff hist +180 Talk:Conservatism in the United States →isues of 2019 go back 2 centuries--there was never a 19c common consensus on unions, race, immigrants, big biz, etc: Meant to include this.
- 08:2308:23, 18 February 2019 diff hist +6,185 Talk:Conservatism in the United States →isues of 2019 go back 2 centuries--there was never a 19c common consensus on unions, race, immigrants, big biz, etc: No they don't. Here are lots of conservative sources.
- 04:1804:18, 18 February 2019 diff hist +503 Talk:Conservatism in the United States →"Require school prayer"? The source doesn't support that language.: Of course the SCOTUS prohibited prayer at public schools, it didn't just strike down any requirement.
- 04:0804:08, 18 February 2019 diff hist +996 Talk:Conservatism in the United States →"Require school prayer"? The source doesn't support that language.: That source doesn't either. Reply.
- 03:5203:52, 18 February 2019 diff hist −1 m Talk:Conservatism in the United States →isues of 2019 go back 2 centuries--there was never a 19c common consensus on unions, race, immigrants, big biz, etc
- 03:3903:39, 18 February 2019 diff hist +655 Talk:Conservatism in the United States →"Require school prayer"? The source doesn't support that language.: new section
- 03:2503:25, 18 February 2019 diff hist +4,913 Talk:Conservatism in the United States →isues of 2019 go back 2 centuries--there was never a 19c common consensus on unions, race, immigrants, big biz, etc: Most of the big ones don't. The left/right dynamic didn't appear in America until the end of the 19th Century. Prior to that there was a broad consensus on individual liberty for citizens, free market economics, constitutionalism, limited government, and the Judeo-Christian ethic.
- 01:5401:54, 18 February 2019 diff hist +145 Conservatism in the United States Simply allowing school prayer or states to more narrowly define what marriages they recognize and encourage isn't "very strong" gov. Abolishing abortion, slavery, or murder is intervention but cons. would do those at the federal level if possible. Those stances aren't driven by federalism. Police is a local issue and cons. supp. mirrors that for the military at fed. level. We can't obscure that libs support more gov. at all levels, including tax/spending and personal behav. reg..How about this?
