The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
According to the OED, the word is spelt "paralleled" in the UK. (e.g. "1841 W. Spalding Italy & Italian Islands Islands 187 For the Italians, the Middle Ages were an era of such grandeur as even their ancient history had not paralleled." "1946 D. C. Peattie Road of Naturalist (U.K. ed.) v. 52 We paralleled the fresh alluvial green winding along the Sevier's course." [[1]]. simongraham (talk) 19:15, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
To be fair, the OED lists both forms, including the 1986 example "This parallelled portion on the back sticks allows the bow to go down far enough without leaving unsightly gaps around the holes on the top edge." And Wiktionary lists it as the UK spelling: see here and here. Chiswick Chap, Johnbod, or Serial Number 54129, any advice on this one? --Usernameunique (talk) 02:58, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Check-Plagarism confirms that there is no plagarism.
Layout follows the Manual of Style guidelines, including a reference section.
The references are relevant. However, there is a reliance on primary sources for some of the data. Please consider replacing these with secondary sources.
I think the only primary sources are those about the farmhouse being renovated—it's a minor point, and I don't think there's much better to replace them with. --Usernameunique (talk) 17:55, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
You are right that the reference to Peak Venues Benty Grange is a primary source. It reads like an advert so that should definitely be replaced. However, there are also others (e.g. Peak District Applications 2012). Are any of the secondary sources able to replace any of the primaries? Incidentally the reference British Museum Faversham 1 does not link to a live page. simongraham (talk) 19:15, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Peak District Applications 2012 is also about the farmhouse being renovated—it's used in the same sentence. Unfortunately, however, these are the sort of minor details that are nice to have but unlikely to be found in academic articles or the like. But for what it's worth, the same sentence and sources appear in Benty Grange helmet, and passed muster during the featured article review. Meanwhile, I've updated the British Museum links for the Faversham escutcheons. The museum seems to update their URLs every couple years and discard the old ones; it's incredibly frustrating. --Usernameunique (talk) 02:58, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.