This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Companies To-do: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes Maintain : Portal:Companies Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs Other : Tag company articles with the ((portal|Companies)) template Tag company talk pages with the ((WikiProject Companies)) project banner Answer requests for comments

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (your reason here) --Marialos2012 (talk) 23:02, 24 September 2012 (UTC) all the information on the page is factually correct and verifiable. The links provide readers to more in-depth information.[reply]

• Most of the content was quite spammy, but since there was a kernal of worthwhileness, I declined the speedy and did the cleanup. Note that Wikipedia is written from a neutral point of view, which means that words like "high quality", "safe", "reliable", "precedent-setting milestones", "world's leading companies", "global player and provider of the World's most powerful batteries", "high profile" are all highly inappropriate and likely to create the impression that the article is spam. If you need help, please ask. WilyD 08:39, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]