This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Arts and Entertainment This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Low-importance). BBC Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Tasks for WikiProject BBC: edit history watch purge Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Improve BBC, BBC News (TV channel) and BBC News to Good Article status following previous reviews, create BBC Computer Literacy Project (in light of forthcoming 30th anniversary) Cleanup : Chucklevision - references and general clean-up, Pebble Mill Studios - over-detailed and long, BBC World Service Television - unreferenced and confusing Copyedit : BBC News, Broadcasting House Expand : Top 20 start-class BBC articles with most importance: BBC Japan, BBC World Service Television, BBC Lifestyle, BBC Two Northern Ireland NPOV : Criticism of the BBC (See comments) Stubs : Stub-Class BBC articles Other : *Restructure the category Add infoboxes to the BBC articles without infoboxes Add free-use images to biographical articles where possible Add references to Goa Mix (see assessment) and Coat of arms of the BBC Return Dad's Army to a Good article. (See comments) Reassess BBC following improvements to article. University of Oxford Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Oxford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of OxfordWikipedia:WikiProject University of OxfordTemplate:WikiProject University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. United Kingdom Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE. C at Access (talk · contribs) has been paid by Access Industries on their behalf.

This page reads like Cohen's CV. 87.112.151.26 (talk) 14:52, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, this needs more objective editing. Much talk of "boy wonder" and "wunderkind" - he has been called a lot of other things too, perhaps these should be included as well to give more balance? SkinheadEscapes (talk) 07:41, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Such as? As this a BLP anything added needs properly sourcing. Jamesinderbyshire (talk) 14:03, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This reads like Mr. Cohen's mother wrote it. A little neutrality please? Markhh (talk) 16:22, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well if you are talking about the "boy wonder" and "wunderkind" sentences, they are both sourced from quality newspaper articles. I don't really see there's anything wrong with including them as such and the overall tone seems fairly matter-of-fact. If there is critical material in reliable sources, we can include that too. Jamesinderbyshire (talk) 11:13, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Critical material in reliable sources duly included. Andysurtees (talk) 02:56, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I would like to make the following suggestions to update the "President of Access Entertainment" section:

• In the first sentence, it is inaccurate and reductive to refer to "industrialist Len Blavatnik." Instead, please change to "businessman and philanthropist Len Blavatnik" or simply "Len Blavatnik."
• Change the second and third sentences, which vaguely refer to the company's "ambition" and how much money it "aims to invest," to the more factual and concise: "The company's stated aim was to be 'one of the world's leading independent investors in the entertainment media sector.'"^[1] And follow that with an additional sentence on the entertainment categories in which the company invests: "Access Entertainment invests in content for theatre, film, television, gaming, the creator economy and the visual arts."^[2]
• Please add the following sentence on Cohen's role in A24 films:

  Under Cohen's leadership, Access has invested in the production company A24, and, alongside Blavatnik, he has been named as executive producer on several A24 films, including Beau is Afraid, The Iron Claw and the Oscar-winning film The Zone of Interest.^[3]

Thanks for your attention. C at Access (talk) 20:17, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Partially done! Minus some promotional-sounding language. Likeanechointheforest (talk) 21:43, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered.

Hello again. I have a few more edits to suggest.

• In the infobox, please change the "Known for" field from the inaccurate and overly broad "Contribution to comedy and entertainment" to the more specific "Former Director of BBC Television"
• In the "Controller of BBC Three" section, the list of TV series names at the end of the first paragraph is excessively long, so please trim by removing Lip Service and Lee Nelson's Well Good Show.
• In the "Personal life" section, please add Daniel Craig^[1] after Rachel Weisz (his wife), as one of the attendees at the wedding.
• At the end of the "Personal life" section, please add the following:

Since the October 7, 2023 Hamas-led attack on Israel and the ensuing Israel-Hamas war, Cohen has been a regular contributor to The Telegraph, writing on antisemitism in the UK. In particular, he has criticized the BBC's coverage of the war, accusing the broadcaster of anti-Israel bias.^[2][3][4][5]

Thanks, C at Access (talk) 13:10, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•  Done. I've adding a BBC source for that last point so that there's no question for a BLP. --Masem (t) 23:09, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Thanks Masem for implementing the edit request. I had two other quick thoughts:

  • In the "President of Access Entertainment" section, could you add the following at the end? "He has also invested in creator economy firm Spotter, the mobile game developer Tripledot Studios, and the arts centre Lightroom." (Sources: The Times, The Stage)
  • In the second paragraph of the Personal life section, the part about voting for Corbyn being like a Muslim voting for Trump - though based on an accurate quote - feels like excessive and distracting detail that doesn't add anything encyclopedic to the first part of the sentence. Would it make sense to trim that part?

  Thanks again, C at Access (talk) 14:18, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  added the first point, and replaced the prose with the direct quote for the second since there's more subtle meaning to it. — Masem (t) 16:32, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I'd like to request that the "Jimmy Savile and Pollard report" section be removed. After reading through the sources, it's clear that Cohen had no direct involvement in the incident- the relevance to him personally is limited to his not reading an email he was cc'd on while working at the company. This article from The Guardian covers the entire scandal in detail and doesn't mention Cohen at all. The current paragraph alludes to more connection than there really was, which is even demonstrated in the following speculative quote: "it was at least possible that further questions..." As such, this material seems to violate WP:UNDUE and does not belong in a WP:BLP. Thanks for taking the time to look this over. C at Access (talk) 14:10, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, I read the sources and at least to call this a controversy around him seems excessive. — Masem (t) 16:25, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]