This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the History of Brazil article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Like some other Brazil-related articles, this one has repeated references to "miscegenation." Currently this term is considered offensive, according to Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.143.146.234 (talk) 04:55, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
Talk:History of Brazil/archive 1 See http://lcweb2.loc.gov/frd/cs/brtoc.html for public domain text that can be copied into this series. --Jiang
It is a mistake to call them "stone age" as this is a term applying to a chronological period, and its use here is Social Darwinian. Whilst Tupi-Guarani language emerged later as the major family, the decimation of Indian populations leaves us ignorant as to which was originally numerically preponderant. John D. Croft (talk) 21:09, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
Brazilians have great appetites. Say what?! I don't think that this is appropriate for an encyclopedia; it is appropriate for a late night talk show. If I'm mistaken about the humorous nature of this sentence, then what is its meaning?
The low social indicators and the huge national debt are by no means a result of the Fernando Henrique administration. The national debt was acquired during the dictatorship, and has been a growing problem ever since, and the social indicators actually rose quite a bit between 1995-2001. I've corrected this. --Paraiba 04:52, 20 Aug 2004 (UTC)
"Thanks to vast natural resources and cheap labor, Brazil is today South America's largest economy, the world's ninth largest economy, and fifth most populous nation." oh boy... where did this come from?
Brasil was not the only country of the New World to effectively establish a monarchic state; Mexico did it twice; though the first one was short-lived, the second one re-arragned the country adminsitratively and politically. --J.Alonso 18:54, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
yes and Pedro died in a killing he lifed 1825-1891 also Genarl Manuel D. da. Fresca was or put himself in a place of honor —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jessekisser23 (talk • contribs) 17:43, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
The view of seminomadic hunters and tribes living off the wilderness of the the Amazon jungle has been challenged since the 1990ies. I am not an expert on that and refer to the article "1491" in "Atlantic Monthly | March 2002" (http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/prem/200203/mann). Author Charles C. Mann refers to recent research by archeologist Anna C. Roosevelt of the Chicago Field Museum of Natural History and several botanologists and geographers. They indicate that the indigenous population before 1491 had created the rain forest ecosystem by systematically planting trees and shrubs and ameliorating the soils. The Amazon Rain Forest -if this hypothesis stands- is not a wilderness but the result of human activity. I think this idea should be mentioned. --Kipala 11:40, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
1491
hello also pedro the 2nd was killed by a general and lived for 1825 - 1891
jessekisser23 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jessekisser23 (talk • contribs) 17:44, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
I was on the main page and I started reading and on the 5th paragraph, the first line, some of the text is blocked and I can't read it. I'm relatively new to Wikipedia so could somebody else please move the picture slightly so it is readable. This is a realatively minor problem
Thanks Nelson
The famous Governor of Dutch Brazil wasn't the great Maurits of Nassau but his godson and relative Johan Maurits van Nassau-Siegen.
That wasn't Jango, that was Quadros, a completely different guy. So, only as a precaution, I'll add a "citation needed" thing to the rest of the paragraph. Also, would you mind reading a book about the subject before writing it on the wikipedia? I don't go around writing that Lincoln wrote the declaration of independence of the United States. --200.222.30.9 20:09, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
I've moved the Infobox up to the "abstract" (introductory) section. It still needs some better-ification from someone who's familiar with Template Editing... cheers201.27.222.29 23:45, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
Added a POV to that section, as it really lacks a NPOV, more like a newspaper article then an encyclopedia entry. 200.196.123.49 (talk) 04:17, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
This section says that Goulart was in favor of the Bay of Pigs; yet another unreferenced Wiki article says the opposite.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CIA_activities_in_Brazil — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.210.115.111 (talk) 20:37, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
I think, this article has almost no information on the dictatorship in 80s and transition to direct elections of presidents. It would be great if some one can fill in this gap. I'm unable to do this. 178.0.1.141 (talk) 11:30, 9 June 2013 (UTC)Oleg.
I've deleted this phrase, because without explanation, it's implausable that indians crossing the Bering strait in Alaska walked (?) all the way to Brasil. We need at least a few paragraphs to cover what happened there. Why not also cover geologic history, before humans arrived (i.e. the separation of South America from western Gondwana, the spread of rainforests and the rise of the Andes mountains?) This article is really about Portuguese/European history of Brasil, and starts with what little we discovered about Brasilian indians when Europeans got there.Sbalfour (talk) 19:51, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
Indigenous monarchy is not an adequate term for the Brazilian monarchy, considering that the monarchs descended from two of the most traditional European royal houses. And the country itself saw itself as a continuation of the Portuguese monarchy in the Americas. 200.250.25.114 (talk) 14:11, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
Brazilian speak brasilianease 43.231.29.148 (talk) 09:48, 11 September 2023 (UTC)