Arguments for inclusion of this page:

These points made, I would be happy to have someone point out which elements of the page are considered unabashed promotion, and will be happy to edit those sections accordingly.

BizGooRoo (talk) 17:19, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on LGI Homes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check)) (last update: 5 June 2024).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:28, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Updates to this page[edit]

The content on the Wikipedia page in question is notably outdated. 2 months ago, I updated it with pertinent information after conducting thorough research over several hours prior to my posting. Upon revisiting the page after a two-months, I noticed that my revisions had been reversed, and I found myself accused of having a conflict of interest (COI). I would like to clarify that this is not the case, and, in accordance with Wikipedia's policy, it is typically assumed that contributors act in good faith. I kindly request that if there are specific elements of my edits that have raised concerns, they be openly discussed here for further evaluation.

Furthermore, it is essential to emphasize that Wikipedia's overarching mission is to accumulate well-researched and reliable information. In this context, it may be more constructive to retain the rigorously vetted portions of my contributions while removing any aspects that are deemed inaccurate or unverifiable. I wish to provide additional context by mentioning that I am a real estate blogger with a comprehensive understanding of the subject matter, which includes knowledge about the home builder in question and similar entities. Nonetheless, I would like to reaffirm that my involvement does not represent a conflict of interest.Tourdefrance57 (talk) 05:02, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]