This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
This page needs a photo
This page needs a photo. Anyone going on vacation? Meelar 07:01, 11 Mar 2004 (UTC)
There's a useful pic at Las Vegas, Nevada. I've been planning to take some myself, just waiting for good lighting, ha ha. Stan 15:57, 11 Mar 2004 (UTC)
Missing resorts
I note the Imperial Palace is missing, but I'm not sure where it should go on the list. —Morven 23:43, Aug 5, 2004 (UTC)
The guideline should be to sort in ascending order of the street number. Feel free to add missing info.
Edited resort names (not page titles) to better reflect common use names.
Expanded footbridge section, although footbridge is a valid term, I like what the news-casters called them (although lengthy), Overhead Pedestrian Walkways.
Comments? (This is Guy M(talk) reporting live, one block from L.V. Blvd. South) 15:40, Feb 27, 2005 (UTC)
I like the overhead bit. I had just asked about this on another page and will use it there. Thanks for the idea.Vegaswikian 04:13, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)
I added a few major hotels with mixed feelings. They have their own web pages and checkin so, they are really like a hotel.Vegaswikian 04:54, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Here is a list of resorts that I think need to have a page created.
When they are added these links will go from red to blue. If someone has a better name, adjust what I have suggested when you create the page.Vegaswikian 00:12, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
(²) Suggestions:
Drop the use of "Las Vegas" as a suffix, unless it's part of the business name or referencing a single location that is also exists in another city?
Good: Caesars Palace Las Vegas (Currently as Caesars Palace)
Ugly: Flamingo → Flamingo Las Vegas but not Flamingo (hotel and casino) / Flamingo Timbuktu disambiguates from pink birds
"hotel" and/or "casino" only be applied without ( )'s if part of the business name? And use of "(hotel and/or casino)" only when a needed for disambiguation?
I removed the comments about the largest motel since everyone lists it as a hotel casino, even the Westward Ho on their site. I found no support for the claim of 1,000 rooms. I did find two different room counts 777 and 900. I used the 777 since it matches what Frommers lists, and they are usually correct.Vegaswikian 05:26, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)
777 is what they quoted my on the phone when I called. …GuyM…(soapbox) 03:55, July 27, 2005 (UTC)
Hotel and Motel
I'm not argueing what a hotel or motel is, but the definitions:
Motel n. An establishment that provides lodging for motorists in rooms usually having direct access to an open parking area.¹
Hotel n. An establishment that provides lodging and usually meals and other services for travelers and other paying guests.¹
IMHO, the following concept is more accurate of a motel:
Motel - A type of hotel in which parking is provided at or near the room and the room door gives outopens onto the parking lot. (HomeBased Travelagent)
... and motels do not have a single lobby entrance for access, hotels do.
Is this really a major strip hotel? Should this be dropped from the table? Vegaswikian 23:57, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
"major", perhaps not. Unless you want to define what "major" is -- such as having more than ## rooms, something quantitative and factual. Still, it is a hotel/casino on the Strip along with Barbary Coast and Boardwalk. SpikeJones 16:31, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Duplicate Info?
Somebody started a Las Vegas Boulevard page. Looks pretty unnecessary to me. Thoughts? SpikeJones 16:31, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Based on looking at the edit history, it was mostly duplicate data. It is currently a redirect to the strip. I am planning on writing an article on this since it is not just the strip. It runs from Apex to south of Jean and there are some interesting points of interest in there. Vegas is odd in that we have fewer streets articles then several other major cities, so adding a few when we have the time does make sense. I'd also like to add one for Fremont street, don't know about any more at this point. Some streets like FSD might be mentioned on the person's page or in passing on some other article. Vegaswikian 23:12, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Looks like User:Brianckeegan has also created the Las Vegas Valley article which again has duplicate data. I thought we were trying to avoid duplicate articles and has the basic structure in place. I'll drop a note on his page. Vegaswikian 23:22, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
I'm the new wikipedian terrorizing the Vegas pages, I've lived in Green Valley since the early 90s. Sorry about the duplicates, was not aware of this discussion. However I would like to know more about the very "diverse" convention for naming hotel/casino/resorts.
See the missing resorts for some discussion on this. As I understand it, you should use the formal name as the article name unless it has, or will have, other articles that want the same name. Also remember the ~~~~ to sign entries. The above link could have been listed in a better wiki format as Category:Hotels of Las Vegas, yea took me a while to find that one. Vegaswikian 18:52, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
I should have added you can take a look at Golden Nugget Companies to see how the three Golden Nugget casinos are named. If you want to change an article name you can by using the Move option, just enter the new name. You should also use the What links here in the toolbox to see what pages link to the old name and then edit all of these to correctly link to the new article name. It you think it may be a problem, use the articles discussion page to explain what you are planning. 19:03, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
July 8, 2005 data in History
This is not encylopedic history, but crystal ball. Not sure that it should be completly deleted or not. It probably should not be kept in history here, since it is not even on the strip. Do we need a place to track major projects? Even failed ones can be notable given the notable people behind them. Comments? Vegaswikian06:18, 30 July 2005 (UTC)
Hey folks, I just noticed that Downtown Las Vegas is set up to redirect to this page. Those of us who live (or have lived) in LV will realize that they aren't the same location. In common usage, "downtown" Las Vegas refers to Fremont Blvd. west of Las Vegas Blvd. - a different location than the Las Vegas strip (generally Las Vegas Blvd. from about Fremont in the north to Sunset in the south).
The downtown hotels would include the Four Queens, Fitzgerald's, the Golden Nugget, Binion's Horseshoe, the Fremont, as well as the entire Fremont Street Experience. Strip hotels would include most of the newer ones (The Mirage, Luxor, Treasure Island, Paris, NYNY, Ballagio, etc.)
I think we should unredirect the two and perhaps set "Downtown Las Vegas" to redirect to "Fremont Street Experience." At the very least, we should put a disambiguation page describing the two options for "downtown" since different people will have different ideas about what constitutes downtown Las Vegas. Having those two options on a disambiguation page will satisfy 99.9% of them.
Also, under the History section of this article, the first line makes reference to a "Highway 91" which no longer exists, if it ever did at all. Highways 93 and 95 are the closest I remember, and I couldn't find Hwy 91 on a mapquest search either. Is it a mistake, or have the highways been renamed? ZZYZX11:33, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
Should not go to the Strip for sure! I'll change to a DAB, feel free to modify. And as I understand it, there was a US 91 from several old sources. Vegaswikian00:24, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
The Sahara is missing from the box at the bottom (as it is on all pages that contain this box). I've tried to work out how to edit it myself but to no avail Speedything 13:44, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
Added back in the virtual tour of Las Vegas strip
Its been in the page for a long time and has value in that it has virtual tours of all
the Las Vegas Strip Hotels. The site has some commerical links but is minimal in comparison
to many in wiki. I would be curious what Vegaswikian thoughts are? (D36001:36, 8 December 2006 (UTC))
Sure it is a commercial site but I could point to many many instances of links to commercial sites that provide legible value to an article. I can say that I personally photographed over 40 hotels and this site has the only comprehensive look inside and outside each hotel with 360 virtual tours. I think you can only get so much out of copy and the rest needs to be seen visually. (D36022:54, 10 December 2006 (UTC))
I noticed but do not have the skill to properly edit the schematic map of the strip that the Imperial Palace and Harrahs are in the wrong locations relative to one another. I believe that just above the Flamingo on the schematic should be the Imperial Palace and THEN Harrahs, but the way it looks right now, one who is visiting for the first time will expect to go from Flamingo straight to Harrahs. If someone can fix that, that would be great.
~Sasheena 23:41, 16 December 2006 (UTC)Sasheena
Thanks for editing the page for me.
Major Hotel Locations - What's the Proper Content?
I noticed that this section is inconsistent as to what is included. For example:
1. The Stardust is still listed on the map, even though it was closed in November 2006. Other closed hotels are not included.
I believe that the Stardust should be removed from the map. Anyone disagree?
2. Project City Center, a future "hotel" (more about that later), is included, yet other projects are not (e.g., Echelon Place, Encore, Palazzo). The issue of future projects is tricky, not only because they're future, but because many of the projects don't neatly fit in the category of "hotel". For example, Project City Center (an MGM Mirage project) will include a main hotel, condominiums, and some boutique hotels not even operated by Mgm Mirage. Do we list each of the hotels separately? The same will be true for Echelon Place: do we list the separately managed Shangri-La, Delano, and Mondrian hotels separately? I propose that, for future projects, it's best just to list the overall project, but that we should list all major projects: Project City Center, Echelon Place, Encore, and Palazzo. I'd leave out Montreux - it's been approved, but the property on which it will be built still hosts the New Frontier. Once they're open, the separately operated hotels should be listed separately. Comments? Larry18:35, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
The maps and lists depend on updates. It is easy to miss needed corrections if a large number of editors are not looking at a specific page. So, if there are errors, please do fix them. Bad edits are usually noticed since most of these articles are on the watch lists for many editors. I really don't know how project City Center should be listed. On one hand a single entry would be cleaner and fit better. However to be more accurate, all of the hotels and casinos really should be listed. Don't know of a good answer at this point in time. Vegaswikian22:25, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
Polo Towers should be included. It is on the strip. It opens into the Hawaiian Marketplace which is co-owned (I think, may be wrong) and is on the strip. If so, it deserves to be on the map. Mercruz (talk) 06:01, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
I've live in and around Las Vegas for 20 years, and my business has made it necessary for me to go into most of the Strip casinos on a weekly basis, and I've never heard the Strip referred to as the Boulevard. Las Vegas Boulevard, sometimes, but never just The Boulevard. I guess I could be wrong, maybe the 20 something nightclub patrons call it the Boulevard, so I haven't just edited the main text, but I was hoping someone here would either agree or tell me I'm wrong.
Think it's okay to edit the opening "(also known as The Strip and to local residents as The Boulevard) " and to take out "and to local residents as The Boulevard"? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mikevegas40 (talk • contribs) 18:45, 21 March 2007 (UTC).
Bourbon Street Demolished
Bourbon Street was demolished last year, does it belong on the list of closed hotels? While not technically on the Strip, was it very different from the Paddlewheel/Debbie Reynolds? Mikevegas40 19:03, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
Several editors keep deleting appropriate content to the legality of open containers on the Strip along with well-cited references. There is nothing wrong with noting the Strip's open container law in this article. It is both encyclopedic and appropriate; since the content included cited references, it ought to be included. Along with the city of Butte, Montana, the Power & Light District in Kansas City, Missouri, the French Quarter of New Orleans, Louisiana, and the history district of downtown Savannah, Georgia, the Strip is one of the only places in the United States where open containers of alcohol always are allowed on the street. All the other locations' articles include open container information, because it is so unique and appropriate for note. No one has given any good reason for not including this content. It should be included, and I have added it again. 65.28.9.8 (talk) 20:27, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
There are simply too many issues with the proposed addition. First, only about 1 or 2 blocks of the strip are in Las Vegas so any LV municipal code does not apply to most of the strip. Liquor is sold outside of the casinos in the downtown area of LV. If open containers are not allowed, then how are the sales of open containers outside of casinos allowed? Vegaswikian (talk) 04:13, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
Also, the reference that was mentioned did not support the edit of "only 5 places in the US with open container laws". When I removed the text, I also asked if the cited LV municible code was available online. SpikeJones (talk) 11:41, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
The map
The Map is a bit off. I removed theHotel (which is just a part of Mandalay -- no reason for special mention). I actually think the same about Four Seasons (which is just the top few floors of Mandalay). At the least they should be flipped to have MB "closer" to Strip on the map. Also O'Sheas is missing (should be right before Imperial Palace). There may be other things missing but those are things I noticed. IMO the map is the most important part of the whole page and needs to be accurate.Editor2008 (talk) 23:14, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
I agree that TheHotel should be removed. There are just too many hotels with separate names for separate portions. As to O'Sheas, the current map is defined as showing hotels. O'Sheas is just a casino, and thus should be excluded (as is Slots-A-Fun, another casino-only operation). Larry (talk) 00:36, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
Well, you need to consider operation and use. TheHotel has it's own web site and marketing. It is a part of the resort, but not a part of Mandalay Bay. If you want to play this game, then kindly remove The Paris listing. It operates under the Bally's gaming license. So you would then say that they are one in the same. The Four Seasons has different owners and it's own areas including entrance and swimming pool. So how is that a part of Mandalay. An encyclopedia exists to provide information and not to hide it. Maybe someone needs to redo the articles to have a cover one for the resort and then one for each major entity in the resort. Vegaswikian (talk) 01:46, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
Good point about O'Sheas, I guess. But maybe the map should be all the Casinos? It should be more comprehensive, although I love the simplicity. I favor adding O'Sheas and Slots-A-Fun. There is no way theHotel should be on there; it is a marketing gimmick. It is just another tower of Mandalay, there is absolutely no difference. Just because they have a website means nothing. Paris is a completely separate hotel from Bally's, though they are both owned by HET. Nobody staying at Paris would say they are staying at Bally's. But if you are at theHotel you would say you are staying at Mandalay -- the only difference is they try to market it more. The Four Seasons may have its own pool and checkin but it is nothing more than the top several floors of Mandalay. Still, it is a separate and independent brand outside of Vegas, and people see it as that, so it should stay on the map.Editor2008 (talk) 02:58, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
Do you realize how many casinos are one the strip? Do you know what is a casino according to Nevada Statues? Do you really want to include every tiny casino on the strip? As far as O'Sheas goes, it is really a part of the Flamingo you can see that talk page where I believe this was discussed in the past. Vegaswikian (talk) 03:51, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
Vegaswikian, for a guy that edits a lot of Vegas articles and claims to know Vegas, you actually appear to know very little about the Strip. I don't know what world you live in where there are tons of small casinos on the Strip without hotels. There is O'Sheas and Slots-A-Fun. I am 95% sure that is all there is, maybe 1 more I am missing but don't think so. I would include all of the non-hotel casinos -- which I think is just those 2. Also theHotel is just a wing of Mandalay Bay, including it as separate makes no sense; but I think I've won that argument via consensus and changed it.Editor2008 (talk) 17:57, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
For sake of others following along, where is the consensus discussion? If you're including my commentary, then there is no consensus as I disgree with you regarding non-hotel casinos. (Followup to my earlier rhetorical question is that JC1K no longer exists, apparently. It may, however, have been replaced by JC2K -- but I have no confirmation on this.) SpikeJones (talk) 19:48, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
Consensus (I think) is on the Mandalay Bay/theHotel/Four Seasons point, not the O'Sheas-Slots-A-Fun point. I have not added the non-hotel casinos. I think they should be added though; just those two, and the Map would then be complete as far as casinos on the Strip.Editor2008 (talk) 21:34, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
Ah. I see your point as you have defined what would make the map complete in your mind. The question is what the map is supposed to represent to all of us. Is it supposed to represent casinos on the strip? Or hotels on the strip? Or casino-hotels on the strip? Or places with neon signs on the strip? etc. SpikeJones (talk) 21:56, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
We did discuss the oSheas thing before, and I believe I lost that discussion (or perhaps I won it -- regardless, I was involved and there was a decision made of some sort) SpikeJones (talk) 04:03, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
If people think that casino information is useful, I have no problem including O'Sheas and Slots-A-Fun. Now, getting back to TheHotel discussion...The fact that TheHotel has its own web site is interesting but not especially helpful. That's more a marketing decision than anything else. I agree that actual use is important. However, we need to be very careful in this area, as Strip hotels are constantly trying to differentiate pieces of themselves. For example:
1. Wynn currently has one building open, BUT that building is split into two pieces: the regular portion for us hoi polloi, and the Tower Suites. The Tower Suites have separate elevators, separate check in facilities, and separate swimming pools. They even are rated separately by Mobil Travel Guide. Even so, I wouldn't list it separately.
2. The Venetian currently has two towers (not even counting the soon to open Palazzo), and they're pretty separate. Again, I wouldn't list them separately.
3. MGM Grand has The Mansion, which is really, really separate from the rest of the MGM Grand. I still wouldn't list it separately. And how about The Signature at MGM Grand, which is described on MGM's web site with the following sentence: "From the moment you drive through the private entrance, you'll know this hotel is different starting with our 24-hour Concierge." So, it is marketed as a separate hotel. However, I wouldn't list this one separately, either.
I think TheHotel is more of a marketing concept than anything else, and doesn't deserve inclusion any more than the above examples. I even question the inclusion of The Four Seasons, but that's a tough enough decision that I'm inclined to go along with the majority. Larry (talk) 03:42, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
My opinion -- if a specific hotel has their own check-in desk/rooms/staff AND casino, then they should be listed. Casino-only locations should not be listed. Hotel-only places should not be listed. Timeshare locations and condos-for-rent should not be listed. (a rhetorical aside for those paying attention: why don't we list the JC1K ultralounge?) SpikeJones (talk) 04:03, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
I would like to point out, that there is no consensus here. So please don't use this discussion to claim consensus for changes. Vegaswikian (talk) 22:16, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
That's fine, perhaps consensus (about theHotel) was too strong. In any event, the very minor change is sensible and others seem to agree. Consensus is not required for such a change, obviously. I find it frustrating that you keep reverting based on a perceived lack of consensus. It is a minor point, perhaps, but there is no reason to include theHotel without including several other separately-branded towers/mansions/etc. of major strip hotels. theHotel is part of Mandalay. There is no "theHotel casino." It's just a tower at Mandalay with suites. Editor2008 (talk) 00:10, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Vegaswikian, have you even ever been to Vegas or are you a 16 year old kid in his mom's basement in Duluth? theHotel has no casino. It is an extension of Mandalay Bay. The casino is located in Mandalay Bay. It's all connected, just like every huge resort in Vegas has multiple towers. Editor2008 (talk) 00:49, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Wow, people are very passionate about this subject! Vegaswikian, as stated above I too believe that TheHotel does not belong. Several examples of similar cases were supplied (Wynn's Tower Suite, Venetian, MGM's The Mansion, The Signature at MGM). While these examples are the best, there are other examples. How do you differentiate TheHotel from them? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Traveling Man (talk • contribs) 01:26, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
(outdent) First, to Editor2008, there is no reason to be rude to Vegaswikian. The fact that people are here discussing proposed changes to the article instead of going to a revert war is the proper way to go about things without having a revert war. We're all capable of being civil, yes? Good. Now let's move on to the matter at hand. As I said earlier, Editor2008 made an interesting point about what he thinks the map represents: the map would then be complete as far as casinos on the strip. If you look at the map itself, it is labeled as "major hotel locations", with a linked sub-page for a full list. To me this label implies a few things: (a) we're only going to have the major hotels listed; (b) casinos without hotels will not be listed; (c) what the map represents is not a complete list and there is another page that has that information. That being said, I would not consider hotels within hotels to qualify as "major hotel locations" if we use the listed map definiton in its strictest sense. I do think, however, that the average joe walking down the strip would be able to identify what would qualify as a "major hotel" without getting into the nitty-gritty that a vegas fan would point at. My two cents, now I'll stay out of it. SpikeJones (talk) 03:17, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Definitions
There were some changes redefining the strip. I am strongly considering revering those changes since this article is about a specific road. Do we really want to expand the article to begin including surrounding areas? Vegaswikian (talk) 07:26, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
The term has importance in tourism and commerce, and I think it should be noted that "the Strip" can refer to more than just the roadway. I agree that citations are necessary. I did a quick search for a legal definition of "the Strip" and I couldn't find anything. The gaming commission does classify properties as "Strip"; see [1]. Presumably that means with an address on LV Blvd, but I could not find a definition in that document. Even using that definition, the size of the properties merits some mention. Simishag (talk) 08:21, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
You may want to consider referencing this section that identifies specific gaming areas as defined by the gaming commission. They do, for example, extend the "strip casino boundary" to include casinos that are not physically located on Las Vegas Blvd. My guess is that they consider The Strip more of a zone that caters to tourists. The Rio and the Hard Rock are supposedly counted as Strip casinos, whereas the Palms and Orleans are not. While the gaming commission may not reveal specifics to anyone willing to call them and ask directly, they may offer reasonable info that can be used to guess the details. SpikeJones (talk) 14:04, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
That was more or less the classification in my head, but that article is also unreferenced. I can't imagine that the classifications are some great big secret, but I couldn't find any sources (although I only looked for 10-15 minutes). Simishag (talk) 20:09, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
While "The Strip" CAN refer to a lot of things, I think the best we can do is refer to it by its most common usage. There's no final arbiter as to what this is, but the Internet itself provides a clue, via its numerous Las Vegas forums. I'm closer to Vegaswikian on this. To me, "The Strip" refers just to Las Vegas Boulevard - and only part of it, at that. I'd go so far as to say that the southern boundary is at Mandalay Bay, and does not include such properties as South Point Hotel, or even Town Square. The northern boundary is somewhat more problematic, but could reasonably go as far north as The Stratosphere. Larry (talk) 15:57, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
I certainly agree with you. For the purposes of this specific article, "the strip" does refer to the roadway from the generally accepted Mandalay Bay to the Strat (although I counter that the Strat is just a wee bit too far north, but whatever). But "the strip area" encompasses a bit more territory. It's like the debate going on over on the Disney articles regarding WDW. It's often references as being in "orlando", but the sticklers are insisting that the location is somewhere more precise. It is, no question, the "orlando area" and an "orlando destination", even though the physical mailing address may be outside the city limits. does this mean that there should be no mention of "orlando" in the Disney articles? That, my friend, is not an argument I recommend jumping into if you don't have time. Keep in mind that Harrah's is going to be expanding east behind the Flamingo/Bally's area by a block or two with their arena and whatnot. That area will still be considered "the strip", in part because of its proximity to the strip itself and association with the rest of the Harrah's complex, right? SpikeJones (talk) 16:39, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
To get the lesser item out of the way first: you make a good point about the Strat. I'm pretty wishy-washy as to its inclusion in the Strip, and would have no problem leaving it out. Now, on to the more fun stuff! The "strip area" is both a useful phrase and a tough one to define. While I consider the Palm and Hard Rock hotels to be off strip, if someone were to describe them as "strip area", I'd have to agree. The upcoming Harrah's arena is a tough one - obviously "strip area" but "on strip?" I'm not sure; it will be interesting to see how it's described once it's built. Larry (talk) 17:37, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
Let's use the arena as our example. (an article detailing arena location specifics) It's being build one block off the strip on Koval on 10 acres of land. It's certainly within easy walking distance from the Strip (as opposed to the Hard Rock, which is walkable but not a casual one). The site is referred to as 'a strip site'. Harrah's has an additional 25 acres adjacent to the arena location -- assuming that the new construction is attached in any way to either the Flamingo or to Bally's so that you don' have to venture outside, would the new Harrah's construction be considered to be under the same roof as the physical strip casinos, and therefore could say that the new construction -- as it's reachable from a strip doorway -- would be located in "the strip zone" for purposes of this article? As to the Palm and Hard Rock and whether they're "on the strip" or not, if the gaming commission includes those properties in their "strip area" for reporting purposes, then that adds credence to the article being about not only the physical strip itself (obviously), but to include the appropriate surrounding area regardless of those associated street names. SpikeJones (talk) 18:21, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
The strip is most commonly used to describe the road and the businesses located on, and having addresses on the strip. I think that should remain the focus of the current area. It could make sense to expand the LV metro area article descriptions to better define what the gaming commission considers in the various areas. I'm not sure that those definitions really apply to anything else. They are an artificial grouping that is constructed to provide a large enough pool of properties so that the data can not be traced back to an individual property. As far as a strip area. I could see an article of some sort. Maybe this should be looked at as part of a series of neighborhood like articles. However we would need to be able to define them. Then there is how to name them. But that can be resolved if a decision is made to create these articles. As to the north end of the strip. I always considered it to end at Sahara. However there were some who believed that it went up to the strat. So if someone wanted to change that I would not be objecting. Vegaswikian (talk) 20:13, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
Here's how I arrived at the boundaries:
The only realistic choices for the northern boundary are Sahara Ave or the Stratosphere. Cutting it off at Sahara could be justified as the point where the city limits begin, but that seems kind of arbitrary. The Strat is the last major resort property; north of this point, the street layouts and zoning change and there is much more industrial and residential development (Paradise Rd also ends here). Because of its status as a landmark and the fact that it doesn't really go in any other category, I think we have to include it.
The southern boundary could be considered Russell Rd, but the "Welcome to Las Vegas" sign is about 1000 ft south of there, in front of Bali Hai. Surely the sign is part of the Strip :) One could argue that the last little chunk of land at Town Square will eventually be considered part of the Strip. I don't think it goes any farther south than I-215 in any case; again, the zoning changes and you start to get into residential & office buildings. Silverado Ranch (South Point) is 3 miles south, definitely too far.
The east-west boundaries are certainly debatable, but I think we have to mention them somehow. If you look just N-S at Tropicana-Spring Mountain and E-W from I-15 to Koval, that's virtually all "Strip properties", but it's 1 mile wide. If you include Fashion Show and the Wynn (plus its golf course), it's over 1.5 miles wide and stretches to Paradise.
Also, I think the properties that are close to or strongly associated with the Strip deserve mention. The LV Strip is not like the Sunset Strip, where everything is right there up front on the road and there is very little depth after the frontage. We already have a name for the road itself (LV Blvd); to me, "Strip" has always referred to the road and the properties. Simishag (talk) 20:34, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
There may still be justification for using the gaming commission's zones... IF they are reporting the Strat as part of "North LV" or "Downtown LV" (or anything other than "Strip"), then there is at least some citable reference for having The Strip cut off at Sahara. Strip properties that fill an entire block between The Strip and Koval do lend credence to including significant properties that are on Koval as being part of "the strip zone". I don't think anyone is questioning the use of "The Strip" to be the piece of LVBlvd. It's the question of "The Strip" vs "the Strip area" that's being brought up. No need to break out new neighborhood articles for Koval or Paradise etc if they are unnecessary in talking about the area that supports The Strip itself. SpikeJones (talk) 20:42, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
Creating a new article is probably just going to lead to duplication of content. I think there's room for both points of view here. "Strip" is basically a contextual term so we should mention its use in different contexts. I will add something to that effect now. Simishag (talk) 21:45, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
free shuttles
A reference is provided to verify that "a room key may be required" and that "enforcement varies." The original statement used words like "many" and "not typically" which are definitive enough that a source would have been required. Simishag (talk) 07:42, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
I was watching CSI and they had a prominent mention of the Tangiers. The name was familiar but I didn't remember where from until I googled it; Wiki didn't have any sort of listing for it. There's also the Montecito Resort and Casino, from the TV series Las Vegas. Now, if it's just these two, maybe they don't deserve a whole section, but I can't help but think there's more. Does anyone else know of any other famous fictional casinos in Vegas? If we can get at least three, I think this deserves its own section, bacause someone who's never been there wouldn't know which casinos are real and which are fictional and if we list them at least people searching for them will have an answer. Critterkeeper05:21, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
The problem is that even the TV shows like Las Vegas have issues keeping track of where their hotels are. (there's even a section on the Las Vegas (TV series) page about it). The Montecito, for example, is displayed in overhead graphics as being literally at the airport behind the Trop. Ed Deline's office overlooks the Mirage driveway (from the viewpoint of TI). Some of the suites and the rooftop have been shown as being the Flamingo (or more likely Barbary Coast) looking towards Paris. The Tangiers is located near Planet Hollywood, IIRC (at least the interiors were often filmed there. Ditto Oceans 13. Oceans 11 didn't do a great job of showing how far away actual casinos were from each other - check the overhead map that Danny shows off when first introducing the plan to rip off Benedict. I don't know if I would add the information here, but perhaps link to a new List of fictional Las Vegas casinos page, if you have enough of them to do so. SpikeJones16:06, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
I don't think just a list would be big enough or have enough detail to warrant a new page. It wouldn't need to get into details of location, so no problem re the Montecito. I am not familiar with every fictional casino, and figured this would be the most likely place to gather more information; if the section grows large enough, it could always be moved to its own page later. Critterkeeper (talk) 05:10, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
If there is to be a list of "fictional Las Vegas casinos", let me add these two from CSI while I'm thinking of it: the Rampart (since imploded) and the Eclipse (currently being built at the same location as the Rampart, in-between Bellagio and Monte Carlo). SpikeJones23:30, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
As of today (20 June 2008), it appears that the name used by Wynn is either "Encore" or "Encore at Wynn Las Vegas." I base this on two items: the Encore web site (http://www.encorelasvegas.com/) and the Wynn employment site (http://www.wynnlasvegas.com/wynnjobs/faq.html). The longer name is the one most frequently used, but I'd say that just "Encore" is a reasonable short version where brevity is important. So, for the graphic of hotels on the Strip, I'd recommend "Encore." Reactions? Larry (talk) 00:21, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
Since the resort now has an article, I'd suggest moving the discussion there. The name I created in under is what was used in the last press release that had a name other then Encore. The article can not be Encore since it is clearly not the primary use, so we need to use another name. Vegaswikian (talk) 00:44, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
The Pollution of The Las Vegas Strip
The gravity of the Las Vegas Strip on the environment. The effects of neon lights, people that come from all over, traphic, construction and anything else that has an effect to the environment on the Las Vegas Strip, go or bad. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.46.24.6 (talk) 17:52, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
Entertainment
All the Entertainment listed is offered by MGM Mirage Resorts. I made a minor addition to this section and someone deleted it. I am "assuming good faith," but this looks more like MGM brochure-ware than a real overview. Here are some more neutral data:
http://www.vegas.com/shows/
According to Vegas.com, a centralized ticket seller, these are the most popular shows:
Le Rêve
There are many popular Las Vegas things to do, ranging from day time activities to night time ones. On account of this, there are a variety of things that can be done. The most popular, however, are the free or inexpensive things to do in Las Vegas.
Things To Do In Las Vegas:
Bellagio Fountains
This show is a light and sound show, coupled with the fountain display. This takes place in front of the Bellagio Hotel, and is acceptable for everyone of all ages.
Gallery of Fine Art at the Bellagio
Located in the heart of the Bellagio you'll find the Gallery of Fine Art. Stop by and visit the current exhibits to see the artworks that have come from museums as well as private collections. Definitely a things to do in Las Vegas for art enthusiasts.
Eiffel Tower Replica
The view from this vantage point is amazing, and you can even take the time to visit the restaurant in the tower, if you are interested in having a little dinner as well. Take a virtual tour at the base of the Paris Las Vegas.
Las Vegas Space Flights
The zero gravity Las Vegas experience is now available for those who wish to feel weightless. A specially designed Boeing 727 will perform effects of a real space flight including flying smaller parabolas that recreate lunar gravity.
The Volcano Eruption at the Mirage Hotel
Among the many Las Vegas things to do on the strip, starting at 6 pm and ending at 11:30 pm, you can go to the Mirage and witness the eruption of the Volcano. This occurs once every 15 minutes.
The Fremont Street Experience
This show is perhaps one of the most energetic of the free things to do in Las Vegas. Taking up a large portion of Fremont Street and using some of the largest screens in the world, this show is good fun and entertainment for individuals of all ages.
Treasure Island Battleship Show
These shows run every 90 minutes starting at 4 and ending at 11:30pm at the Treasure Island Hotel and Casino.
Largest Golden Nugget
In Downtown Vegas, you can see the largest golden nugget in the world at the Golden Nugget Las Vegas Hotel. Open 24 hours a day.
Liberace Museum
This museum has a $6.50 entrance fee, but is well worth it. You can see everything possible dealing with the pianist, and spend a lot of time marveling at the wonders this Museum has to offer.
Gaming Classes at the Las Vegas Hilton
If you are planning on gambling, these 30 or so minute classes can be fun and education. Most of them are free, so why not include them in your things to do in Las Vegas? You will need to inquire on class times at the Las Vegas Hilton. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Macdad7123 (talk • contribs) 02:02, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
The two important things here are WP:Notability and WP:NOT. Wikipedia is not a travel guide, nor is it Wikipedia's purpose to provide recommendations or suggestions. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and as such should only deal in facts. The notability aspect pertains to what is worthy of inclusion. Some attractions and acts/shows are by their international reputation and or ticket grossing more notable that others, and with limited space, a decision has to be taken as to what is noteworthy and what isn't. Mfield (talk) 02:30, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
This article is missing 3 casinos, in my opinion. O'Sheas is not there, neither is Slots-A-Fun. These are the only two casinos on the Strip missing. Echelon Place is on hold and not open yet, fine. So why is Fountainbleau there? It's also on hold and not open yet. My biggest problem with this page is that the main editor taking control of it, Vegaswikian, appears to hold a very hard hand over these edits yet from the discussion on this page the guy knows zilch about the Strip. Almost like he's never been to a single casino. Vegaswiki (talk) 20:42, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
Any specific edits that you think are not correct can be discussed. Or maybe you are referring to removing the information about the parking change for the Welcome to Fabulous Las Vegas sign where the content belong in the article on the sign since it is not directly about the strip. Why is the Fountainbleau there? Well someone added it and it is opening in a few months, so it may not be too early to add it. Given that Echelon is on hold with no completion date, maybe it is reasonable to not list it. You complain that O'Sheas and Slots-A-Fun Casino are not listed, I'm assuming that you mean in the formatted map near the end of the article. Well, since that table lists major hotels, why would you consider either of these casinos as a major hotel? Exactly how many hotel rooms do these casinos have? As to owning the article, I made 8 of the last 100 edits dating back to October 23, 2008. Of those, 3 were related to sourcing the actual length of the strip, which started as revert of an anon change to a totally unsourced length of 8 miles which can not be supported by any facts. Or are you complaining about the removal of 'Jury's Las Vegas Consutrction' and the fact that the Sahara, the Riv, PH, the Trop and others were destroyed? I guess I could have left in the fact that empty lot that was the Bourbon Street is Harrahs future. Or maybe you have a problem with my removal of the ever popular Hacienda downtown Las Vegas? All in all, I don't see how the history of this article in the last 6 months shows any attempt of ownership. Have I reverted edits that most would consider to be vandalism? Yes, I'm guilty. Vegaswikian (talk) 02:18, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
Agree with the above poster: O'Sheas and Slots-A-Fun don't belong on the map (there is a conversation specifically about whether to include or exclude O'Sheas in the archives somewhere, which you're more than welcome to look for as a reference to a previous conversation). SpikeJones (talk) 03:21, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
Transportation
The information in the second-level header "Transportation" seems out of place in this article, as it appears to describe some aspects of Las Vegas Valley transportation in general (street direction borders, etc.). Other info could possibly be duplicated by the other Transportation section earlier in the article. Should this section be moved to another article, perhaps? --LJ (talk) 01:50, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
I think that the section on the strip today could use a good rewrite for a start. I think this article has grown without a good overhaul and cleanup. Vegaswikian (talk) 05:18, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
Capitalization
In both the article and the discussion, the initial capitalization of "the" in "The Strip" is inconsistent. Is the "T" of "the" supposed to be upper or lower case? --66.81.159.134 (talk) 00:07, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
To whomever fixed the problem, thank you. The "the's" are now all lower case.--69.19.183.19 (talk) 22:26, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Northern terminus
There have been many discussions about the northern terminus of the strip. Well today's Las Vegas Sun clearly states that it is Sahara. So hopefully that will put an end to this uncertainty that has plagued this article from its inception. Vegaswikian (talk) 06:27, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
Yes and no. While I agree completely with your logic, I question the definitiveness of the final interpretation as it applies to this WP piece. The news article says "Because city limits end at Sahara Avenue and don’t include the Strip", but the reference could be regarding the marketing use of ".vegas" not being applicable to venues that are outside of city limits (aka the bulk of what the majority of tourists call The Strip). The questions that are better asked regarding the northern terminus are (a) where does the street physically stop being called "The Strip" with regards to mapmakers or on addresses? (b) what does the gaming commission consider The Strip from a reporting perspective? If the gaming commission considers The Strat as part of The Strip reporting, then there is more research to be done. SpikeJones (talk) 03:25, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
As to the gaming commission's definition, since it includes casinos not even located on the road, including one just north of a possible end of the strip would not prove anything, one way or the other. I did find it interesting that the article covering the commission's definition does not include the Strat. Vegaswikian (talk) 06:40, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
Some responses to questions posed by SpikeJones:
"The Strip" is not used as a mailing or physical address. All businesses and properties along the Strip use addresses of "#### Las Vegas Blvd South."
The 2009-2010 Official Highway Map of Nevada, created by the Nevada Department of Transportation, has a Las Vegas Area inset. It shows Las Vegas Blvd as "THE STRIP" with markings indicating it as an "All American Road", between Russell and Sahara. North of Sahara up to downtown, the boulevard is marked as a scenic byway and is not labeled as the Strip.
As far as the Nevada Gaming Commission reporting areas are concerned, The Sahara hotel/casino is part of the LV Strip reporting area, but The Stratosphere is part of the downtown LV reporting area. However, the Strip reporting area also includes many properties in what's commonly referred to as the "resort corridor" that aren't physically located on what is commonly known as the Strip: Rio, Hard Rock, Terrible's, South Point, etc. So the gaming commission's definition of the Strip is not completely reliable as it reaches well beyond the Strip itself.
Further supporting evidence:
Most media mentions of "the Strip" generally refer to the area between Russell and Sahara. When "the Strip" is closed for New Year's Eve celebrations, this is the extent of the closures (see [2]).
This Clark County press release about the county's centennial doesn't officially state the boundaries. However, in discussing programs being held relating to the history of the Strip, it states, "The Strip is located in unincorporated Clark County and is not part of any city". At the bottom, it also states, "The city of Las Vegas, which includes downtown and the area north of the Strip..." Given that the corporate boundary of the City of Las Vegas is at Sahara Avenue, this would seem to support the fact that northern boundary of "the Strip" cannot be any further north than Sahara.
Composite Picture is a Good Pic, But Not for This Article
The newly added composite picture ( Las Vegas composite.png ) is very good, but isn't appropriate for this article. The pic includes two images of hotels that are downtown, not on the Strip. Larry (talk) 14:15, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
Value of Properties along Strip
Was looking for information on the value of major properties along the strip (even if you only included the hotels listed.) I would use the construction value since estimated value is volatile. Just a suggestion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by ReamesSC (talk • contribs) 05:15, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
Suicides on the Las Vegas Strip
I posted research information on suicides in Clark County and the Las Vegas Strip. Another author added credible sources. Why were these entries removed? Is this an encyclopedia or an advertisement? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.53.182.52 (talk) 02:16, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
In the graphic of major hotel locations, I see that Fontainebleau and the Harmon are included. Both buildings are not yet completed, and might never be completed. Is there any reason I shouldn't remove them? --Larry (talk) 18:28, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
The tendency has been to include these while they are under construction. There is no indication that the Fontainebleau will not be completed. What is not know is when. The Harmon may or may not be completed. The result there will depend on the outcome of the county review of the project from the owner and builder. I think that is next week. That outcome will determine if it needs to be torn down or if it can be used. If it is going torn town, then it should come off the list. But note that if the decision is to tear it down, this will probably wind up in court for many years. I think the decision to tear down, even with pending court action, would be a reason to remove it from the list. It should be noted that both of these buildings are 'completed' on the outside. Vegaswikian (talk) 18:50, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
LV Strip gaming area definition
Is there any source for the paragraph about which hotels are included in the LV Strip gaming area? I suspect it's taken from the LV Strip (Nevada gaming area) article, which appears to be largely original research. That article is based mainly on the Nevada Gaming Abstract, which doesn't identify any casinos as being in any particular gaming area, as far as I can find. If this is OR, it should be removed. The Boundaries section can afford to be a lot smaller, anyways. Toohool (talk) 02:22, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
Picture labelled as Caesars appears to be incorrect
Prior to writing this, the article has this picture:
Interior of the Casear's Palace Hotel at 6:30am
It purports to be "Casear's [sic]" but I'm pretty sure that is not correct. Until this is resolved, I've deleted the image from the article.
One editor changed the caption to "Shopping in Bellagio Resort & Casino." I think that editor is correct. It looks like Bellagio, and definitely does not look like Caesars. In addition, the picture includes stores for Armani and Chanel. As far as I know, the only mall which includes both stores is at Bellagio.
What do you folks say? --Larry (talk) 18:55, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
It definitely appears to be much more in line with the style of Bellagio than Caesar's; the ceiling reminds me of the Bellagio's Conservatory (garden exhibit near main lobby). -- LJ↗05:45, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
There is a road above Desert Inn Road, namely Resorts World Drive and Wynn Boulevard. Both of these roads intersect each other with Las Vegas Strip. Which road should we list? Desert Inn Road isn't crossing Las Vegas Strip. So which? Roif456 (talk) 03:56, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
March 2017 shooting
The Strip was closed after a shooting in March 2017. I think this should stay in the "history" section. Has this happened before in recent history?Zigzig20s (talk) 05:44, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
It's not that unusual. Parts of the Strip have been closed because of violent crimes as recently as December 2015 and January 2016. There's no reason to think this latest event will have any lasting impact on the history of the Strip. Toohool (talk) 05:52, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
I don't believe that shootings are news. They're a matter of life and death. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not an advertisement.Zigzig20s (talk) 06:31, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
I concur with Toohool. The event could just as easily occurred on Tropicana Avenue or Boulder Highway... This one shooting, while unfortunate, doesn't really have a lasting impact to the encyclopedic understanding of the Las Vegas Strip—or if it has, that affect has yet to be realized. -- LJ↗06:49, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
I think it does. I for one wouldn't have felt safe had I known this could happen last time I was there. How many times has this happened in recent history? Why are we actively censoring that this is not a safe space?Zigzig20s (talk) 07:02, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Please assume good faith here, editing is not the same as censorship. Every article has to be edited down to the important facts, or else it would become a useless wall of text. A description of a single incident does not help anyone to understand whether the Strip is a safe or unsafe place. If that's the information that you think the article needs, I would suggest you could look for some statistics or other overall information to add about crime on the Strip. Toohool (talk) 07:09, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Moving the same information to a different section wouldn't make it any more important to the article. Crime and safety could certainly be an important topic to discuss in the article, but it should be discussed in an overall, summary style, such as with statistics, not a list of random incidents. Considering that the Strip has been a nexus of seedy activity for about 75 years, that could be a very long and useless list. Toohool (talk) 07:57, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Shootings are not "seedy" activities. They're a matter of life and death. They're not insignificant. We wouldn't be able to edit Wikipedia if caught in the shooting.Zigzig20s (talk) 09:50, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
I have just modified one external link on Las Vegas Strip. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check)) (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
I removed the claim that "Fourteen of the world's 25 largest hotels by room count are on the Strip, with a total of over 62,000 rooms."
There is no reliable source for this claim. There's a reference to another Wikipedia article -- List_of_largest_hotels_in_the_world -- but you can't use a Wikipedia article as a reliable source, that article is itself ill-sourced, and there doesn't seem to be any reliable source for the claim.
The claim is also questionable. It requires one to define "hotel", which is harder than it sounds. The Wikipedia list of hotels includes the Palazzo and the Venetion as one hotel, but NOT Paris and Bally's (which are also connected, and owned by one company). It includes Wynn and Encore as one hotel, but not Mandalay Bay and Luxor. These conclusions have some merit, but are based on analysis and opinion, which is disallowed in Wikipedia. --Larry/Traveling_Man (talk) 14:15, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
Covert 'Demolished or closed Strip casinos and hotels' into table
Can this please be converted into a table? It would make it much easier to navigate the key info (I'm thinking of the columns as follows: name, build date, demolition date, notes/additional information). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.211.51.253 (talk) 07:49, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Stadium???
Sure, the new stadium is being built "near" The Strip, but on the other side of the highway behind Luxor. While certainly worth mentioning in the same breath as Palms and Rio from a "hey, it's in the general area" kind of way... is it right to include it in a manner that suggests it is part of The Strip? SpikeJones (talk) 22:56, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
@SportsFan007: Not sure what you're looking at—Russell Road does not go through at the Strip. See this Google Map: https://goo.gl/maps/zAAfkXUuRMS2. Russell Road dead ends at Las Vegas Blvd, and then picks up again to the east on the other side of McCarran Airport. -- LJ↗15:11, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
Since I heard that the Oakland A's are demolishing the Tropicana casino and replacing it with a new stadium, I think it really needs to be included… EverestMachine 4001 (talk) 02:26, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
It was only a week or two ago that the A's were seriously considering another site nearby but off the Strip. Since the stadium site is still being negotiated, I would not include mention in this in the article until a proposal is finalized and contract negotiated. -- LJ↗13:08, 11 May 2023 (UTC)