This article was nominated for deletion on 29 April 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was Move to Wikipedia:List of commonly misused English words. |
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Index
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Easily confused words, a redirect to this page, has been nominated at RfD. In the discussion at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 1#Easily confused words it has been suggested that this page (Wikipedia:List of commonly misused English words) be moved to articlespace. You are invited to comment in the linked discussion. Thryduulf (talk) 18:08, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
I've removed a number of entries that lacked citations and whose presence was not justified by common sense. Long-term, of course, "common sense" is not a good citation, but for now at least it was a good place to start. If anyone would like to "rescue" any of the sources I removed, please take a look at the diff, and at my edit summaries in the page history. Thanks. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 23:16, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
The number of people who refer to “breaks” and “peddles” is almost enough to drive one to drink. Mr Larrington (talk) 18:13, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
Are prosecute and persecute another pair of commonly misused words? Windywendi (talk) 00:50, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
@Nohat: In my experience, lay and laid are two of the most misused words in English, as much as or not far behind its-it's, there-their-they're, and lead-led. This article, I believe, is their most appropriate location. I'm not aware of lie-lay-laid as disputed, only as misunderstood. The Disputed article does not mention any controversy about lie-lay-laid; it simply provides the correct definitions. If you feel duplicating them there and here is harmful, I urge that the words be removed from the Disputed article and included only in this article, where they much more closely fulfill the premise of the article title. DonFB (talk) 00:01, 5 July 2024 (UTC)