This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anglo-Saxon KingdomsWikipedia:WikiProject Anglo-Saxon KingdomsTemplate:WikiProject Anglo-Saxon KingdomsAnglo-Saxon Kingdoms articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norse history and culture, a WikiProject related to all activities of the NorthGermanic peoples, both in Scandinavia and abroad, prior to the formation of the Kalmar Union in 1397. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Norse history and cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Norse history and cultureTemplate:WikiProject Norse history and cultureNorse history and culture articles
There is a great deal of material in this article that is not demonstrably connected with Ubba. It makes the article much longer than necessary and contains lots of information (and speculation) that belongs elsewhere. Can we prune some of the paragraphs that don't relate to Ubba?--Mevagiss (talk) 13:08, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
In the edit summary for my revert of your addition of a section titled "In popular culture", I said nothing about Ubba's notability. In full, my edit summary reads "Inaccurate, poorly written & formatted; not for this page". The inaccuracy and poor writing are evidenced by, for example, "Ubba (as Ubbe) features in History Channel's historical drama television series ..." – this statement, which ought probably to refer to "the History Channel", is logically impossible, since Ubba has been dead for well over 1,000 years – and "Ubba features in Bernard Cornwell's novel The Last Kingdom and the BBC America's series of the same name ...": the latter example shares the same logical impossibility, twice, but the reference to "BBC America" is inaccurate since the tv series was made by Carnival Films, a UK production company, for the UK channel BBC Twoand BBC America. My reference to poor formatting arose from the failure to link Bernard Cornwell's name correctly – I see that you restored that error in your most recent edit.[1] Those errors are of course easily fixed, but I have not yet explained "not for this page".
Per MOS:POPCULT, "Short cultural references sections should usually be entirely reworked into the main flow of the article. If a separate section for this material is maintained, the poorest approach is a list, which will attract the addition of trivia. It is preferable to develop a normal article section with well-written paragraphs that give a logically presented overview (often chronological and/or by medium) of how the subject has been documented, featured, and portrayed in different media and genres, for various purposes and audiences." As it stands, the "In popular culture" section takes "the poorest approach", made poorer still by the use of bullet points. And I doubt that two tv series and a book – all of which are merely quasi-historical dramatisations – provide enough material for "a normal article section with well-written paragraphs that give a logically presented overview" of Ubba's representation in modern media. If they do, even so this is how such a section ought to be written; not as a bullet-pointed list. Taking the alternative approach of working this information into the existing article, I can see how it might easily fit into the lead, and you might agree that it could possibly form a final prose paragraph in the section "Association with Ragnar Lothbrok", since the subject fits, and the section ends with discussion of historical sources. But that is merely a suggestion, to which others might not agree. As it stands I believe that this section is wholly inadequate, per WP's MoS; and that it is enough that the articles for the two tv series and the book might have links to this article. Hence my view that the section is "not for this page". Regards, Nortonius (talk) 12:01, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I must say I think we should mention his fictional appearances, as other articles normally do nowadays. But the recently reverted addition was not well done, and actually seemed wrong re his plot role in The Last Kingdom ("as leader of the invasion by the Great Heathen Army to avenge Ragnar's death"). That may be a historical motivation/excuse for the "invasion", but it is not portrayed so in either the novel or the tv series. Johnbod (talk) 12:08, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This article has seventeen interwiki links, it is about 2.38 times as long as all the interwiki versions put together. JIP | Talk18:27, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]