This article was nominated for deletion on 26 July 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
This page was proposed for deletion by an editor in the past. |
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article seems to focus entirely on the arguments AGAINST voluntary slavery, with no mention of any arguments in favor of it (eg, the argument that self ownership inherently must include the right to transfer that ownership to another voluntarily, and that self ownership is a fundamental right). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:441:8600:3324:8826:AE48:ACEC:83CB (talk) 21:51, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
i put this article into slavery and it was deemed "Not relevent to article" now another censorer has deemed his job to censor the fact that there is Voluntary slavery on the web.
why can't it be added to exploitation article or the term redirected to exploitation? Jane Benn (talk) 20:53, 26 July 2009 (UTC) comment added by Jane Benn (talk • contribs) 20:32, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
CBC[1] had a discussion on unpaid workers on the web vs old style paying journalist. i guess you people don't know there really is Voluntary slavery out there. the example that was given was thew Huntington Report where most of their journalist don't get paid. Jane Benn (talk) 20:50, 26 July 2009 (UTC) Jane Benn (talk • contribs) 20:41, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
Discussion is at Talk:Slavery#merge from Voluntary slavery. --Beeblebrox (talk) 22:11, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
the tone exhibited in this entry (and, in particular, the second paragraph of the modern analysis section) is more appropriate for an opinion piece than an encyclopedia. "radicals and left-wing activists?" i believe that policy forbids this type of language.
"voluntary slavery" is oxymoron word as the term "slavery" already mean violates the one's freewill, so "voluntary slavery" is never to be any existence because "voluntary" and "slavery" contradicted each other.
Anyone can play the role of "slavery", but it never to be a slavery voluntary since the word "slavery" already states its involuntary. 2001:B011:800A:953A:847D:56EC:22F2:7993 (talk) 00:46, 20 November 2022 (UTC)