You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reasons:

This IP address has been blocked from editing Wikipedia.
This does not affect your ability to read Wikipedia pages.
Most people who see this message have done nothing wrong. Some kinds of blocks restrict editing from specific service providers or telecom companies in response to recent abuse or vandalism, and can sometimes affect other users who are unrelated to that abuse. Review the information below for assistance if you do not believe that you have done anything wrong.

The IP address or range 34.227.0.0/16 has been blocked by ‪Blablubbs‬ for the following reason(s):

The IP address that you are currently using has been blocked because it is believed to be a web host provider or colocation provider. To prevent abuse, web hosts and colocation providers may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.
You will not be able to edit Wikipedia using a web host or colocation provider because it hides your IP address, much like a proxy or VPN.
We recommend that you attempt to use another connection to edit. For example, if you use a proxy or VPN to connect to the internet, turn it off when editing Wikipedia. If you edit using a mobile connection, try using a Wi-Fi connection, and vice versa. If you are using a corporate internet connection, switch to a different Wi-Fi network. If you have a Wikipedia account, please log in.
If you do not have any other way to edit Wikipedia, you will need to request an IP block exemption.

How to appeal if you are confident that your connection does not use a colocation provider's IP address:
If you are confident that you are not using a web host, you may appeal this block by adding the following text on your talk page: ((unblock|reason=Caught by a colocation web host block but this host or IP is not a web host. My IP address is _______. Place any further information here. ~~~~)). You must fill in the blank with your IP address for this block to be investigated. Your IP address can be determined here. Alternatively, if you wish to keep your IP address private you can use the unblock ticket request system. There are several reasons you might be editing using the IP address of a web host or colocation provider (such as if you are using VPN software or a business network); please use this method of appeal only if you think your IP address is in fact not a web host or colocation provider.

Administrators: The IP block exemption user right should only be applied to allow users to edit using web host in exceptional circumstances, and requests should usually be directed to the functionaries team via email. If you intend to give the IPBE user right, a CheckUser needs to take a look at the account. This can be requested most easily at SPI Quick Checkuser Requests. Unblocking an IP or IP range with this template is highly discouraged without at least contacting the blocking administrator.

This block will expire on 11:46, 23 November 2025. Your current IP address is 34.227.114.28.

Even when blocked, you will usually still be able to edit your user talk page, as well as email administrators and other editors.

For information on how to proceed, please read the FAQ for blocked users and the guideline on block appeals. The guide to appealing blocks may also be helpful.

Other useful links: Blocking policy · Help:I have been blocked
This IP address range has been globally blocked.
This does not affect your ability to read Wikipedia pages.
Most people who see this message have done nothing wrong. Some kinds of blocks restrict editing from specific service providers or telecom companies in response to recent abuse or vandalism, and can sometimes affect other users who are unrelated to that abuse. Review the information below for assistance if you do not believe that you have done anything wrong.

This block affects editing on all Wikimedia wikis.
The IP address or range 34.227.0.0/16 has been globally blocked by ‪Jon Kolbert‬ for the following reason(s):

Open proxy/Webhost: See the help page if you are affected

This block will expire on 05:38, 21 February 2029. Your current IP address is 34.227.114.28.

Even while globally blocked, you will usually still be able to edit pages on Meta-Wiki.

If you believe you were blocked by mistake, you can find additional information and instructions in the No open proxies global policy. Otherwise, to discuss the block please post a request for review on Meta-Wiki. You could also send an email to the stewards VRT queue at stewards@wikimedia.org including all above details.

Other useful links: Global blocks · Help:I have been blocked

You can view and copy the source of this page:

((short description|2007 book by Bryan Caplan))
((Infobox book
| name         = The Myth of the Rational Voter
| image        = File:The Myth of the Rational Voter.jpg
| caption      = Cover of the first edition
| author       = [[Bryan Caplan]]
| country      = United States
| language     = English
| subject      = [[Democracy]]
| publisher    = [[Princeton University Press]]
| release_date = 2007
| media_type   = Print ([[Hardback]])
| pages        = 276 (2007 edition)
| isbn = 978-0-691-12942-6
| isbn_note = (2007 edition, hbk)
| dewey= 320.6 22
| congress= HD87 .C36 2007
| oclc= 71581737
))
'''''The Myth of the Rational Voter: Why Democracies Choose Bad Policies''''' is a 2007 book by the economist [[Bryan Caplan]], in which the author challenges the idea that voters are reasonable people whom society can trust to make laws.  Rather, Caplan contends that voters are irrational in the political sphere and have systematically [[bias]]ed ideas concerning economics.

==Summary==
Throughout the book, Caplan focuses on voters' opinion of economics since so many political decisions revolve around [[economic]] issues ([[immigration]], [[trade]], [[Welfare economics|welfare]], [[economic growth]], and so forth). Using data from the Survey of Americans and Economists on the Economy (SAEE), Caplan categorizes the roots of economic errors into four [[bias]]es: anti-market, anti-foreign, [[make-work job|make-work]], and pessimistic.

===Anti-market bias===
Caplan refers to the anti-market bias as a "tendency to underestimate the benefits of the market mechanism."<ref name="Caplan"/>((rp|30)) In Caplan's view, people tend to view themselves as victims of the market, rather than participants of it. He also categorises a few major misconceptions associated with this bias: (1) a view that market payments are transfers rather than incentives, (2) a belief in a monopoly theory of price, where firms impose prices on consumers without recourse.

In the first, he describes that "people tend to see profits as a gift to the rich" and that "limiting profits" permits pity to the poor.<ref name="Caplan"/>((rp|32)) However, profits are seen by economists as means to promote trade in those sectors.<ref name="Caplan"/>((rp|32)) Moreover, the historical attacks on usury and windfalls see interest as robbing the borrower. Yet, interest is in fact two things: the creditor delaying his own consumption for compensation (known as liquidity preference) and compensation for the risk of borrower defaults.<ref name="Caplan"/>((rp|33))

The second is where corporations, even small-scale suppliers, are seen as greedy monopolists that prey on the consumer. Caplan argues that all trade is a two-way street and that people like middlemen are not interposers attempting to fleece the people, but rather, making up for transportation, storage, and distribution costs.<ref name="Caplan"/>((rp|34)) At a more broad level, cheating people is bad for business and the existence of multiple firms offering similar products implies competition, not monopoly power, which limits any firm's ability to increase prices.<ref name="Caplan"/>((rp|35))

===Anti-foreign bias===
Caplan refers to the anti-foreign bias as a "tendency to underestimate the economic benefits of interaction with foreigners."<ref name="Caplan"/>((rp|36)) People systematically see their country of origin as in competition with other nations and so oppose free trade with them. Foreigners are seen as the "enemy" even if the two governments are at a lasting peace. The principles of comparative advantage allow two countries to benefit a great deal from [[trade]], even if one is worse than the other in every single way.<ref name="Caplan"/>((rp|38)) The degree of benefit is rarely equalized, but it is always positive for both parties. Caplan also notes how the anti-foreign bias can be rooted in pseudo-racist attitudes. For Americans, trading with Japan and Mexico is more controversial than trading with Canada and England, which are more linguistically and ethnically similar to the United States.<ref name="Caplan"/>((rp|39))

===Make-work bias===
Caplan refers to the make-work bias as a "tendency to underestimate the economic benefits from conserving labor."<ref name="Caplan">Bryan Caplan, ''The Myth of the Rational Voter: Why Democracies Choose Bad Policies'' ([[Princeton University Press]], 2007).</ref>((rp|40)) Caplan claims that there is a tendency to equate economic growth with job creation. However, that is not necessarily true, since real economic growth is a product of increases in the productivity of labor. Dislocation and unemployment can be caused by productivity gains making certain jobs no longer necessary. All things being equal, economic rationality would require that these people make use of their talents elsewhere. Caplan makes special emphasis of the movement away from farming over the past 200 years, from nearly 95% of Americans as farmers in 1800 to just 3% in 1999, as an illustrative example.<ref>W. Michael Cox and Richard Alm, ''Myths of Rich and Poor'' (New York: Basic Books, 1999), p. 128. Cited in Bryan Caplan, ''The Myth of the Rational Voter'', p. 42.</ref> As an economy industrialises, increased labor productivity in agriculture means less labor is needed to produce a given quantity of agricultural goods, freeing up labour (a scarce resource) to be employed in the production of manufactured goods and services.

===Pessimistic bias===
Caplan refers to the pessimistic bias as a "tendency to overestimate the severity of economic problems and underestimate the (recent) past, present, and future performance of the economy."<ref name="Caplan"/>((rp|44)) The public generally perceives economic conditions as declining or about to decline. Caplan alleges that there is often little or no evidence to back up such perceptions of imminent apocalypse. Among challengers Caplan cites is [[Julian Lincoln Simon]] and his book, ''[[The Ultimate Resource]],'' which argues society continues to progress despite claims of environmental degradation and an increasing use of natural resources.

==Survey of Americans and Economists on the Economy==
The author pays special attention to the 1996 Survey of Americans and Economists on the Economy (SAEE), created by ''[[The Washington Post]]'', the [[Kaiser Family Foundation]], and [[Harvard University]] Survey Project. The SAEE asked 1,510 random members of the American public and 250 people with [[PhD]]s in economics the same questions concerning the economy. In addition to its 37 topical questions, the SAEE also inquired about the participant's income, income growth, education, and other demographic information.

The answers to the questions are often different: the public often blames [[technology]], [[outsourcing]], high [[corporate]] [[profit (economics)|profits]], and [[Layoff|downsizing]] as reasons for why growth is lower than it could be. Economists, on the other hand, barely pay any heed to such arguments. Some 74% of the public blame greedy oil companies for high gas prices, but only 11% of economists do.<ref name="Caplan"/>((rp|87)) The public tends to believe [[real versus nominal value (economics)|real]] incomes are decreasing while economists take the opposite stance.

Caplan notes that the chasm between economists and the general public might arguably be due to bias on the expert's part. [[Self-serving bias]] (economists are rich and so they believe whatever benefits them) and [[ideological assumption]]s (economists are a bunch of [[right-wing]] ideologues) are two challenges the author addresses. Caplan writes: "Both the self-serving bias and the ideological bias are, ''in principle'', empirically testable. Economists' views are the product of their affluence? Then rich economists and rich noneconomists should agree. Economists are blinded by conservative ideology? Then conservative economists and conservative noneconomists should agree."<ref name="Caplan"/>((rp|54))  In turn, if self-serving bias is unavoidable, it would likewise skew the perceptions of the non-wealthy, causing them to believe both the "'ought' claim" that government should reduce inequality of wealth and the "'is' claims" that existing inequalities of outcome are severe and are perpetuated by corporate and governmental power structures.

Using data from the SAEE (which includes measures for ideology, income, job security, and other measures), Caplan simulates what people would believe if they had the same circumstances as economists, a technique often used in [[political science]] called "enlightened preferences". If the ideological and self-serving biases are true, most of the difference between the "enlightened public" and economists should disappear. If, however, the enlightened public is not much closer to economists, then something else is going on, as those explanations have been neutralized. Caplan believes that that something else is the biases he enumerated earlier. The data tends to support Caplan's argument, with most (but not all) of the enlightened public closer to economists than to the public.

==Rational irrationality==
((Main|Rational irrationality))

In standard [[neoclassical economics]], people are assumed to be [[rationality|rational]]; the notion of systematic bias is considered to be a sloppy assumption. In many ways, Caplan agrees: most people are rational when it comes to choosing a job, buying milk, hiring employees, and selecting a business strategy. They can be wrong, of course, but a systematic bias rarely, if ever, occurs.

But the author argues they are rational only because it is costly to be wrong. A [[Racism|racist]] will still hire a qualified black person because going to the second-best option will be expensive to the company. A [[Protectionism|protectionist]] will still [[outsourcing|outsource]] because he has to achieve as many advantages over his competitors as he can to stay in business. Someone who thinks a [[discount store]] is haunted will seriously question their conclusions when they find their budget to be tight.

Sometimes, however, it is virtually costless for the individual person to hold on to their preconceived beliefs, and people enjoy such beliefs. ''Rational irrationality'' simply states that when it is cheap to believe something (even when it is wrong) it is rational to believe it. They refuse to retrace their logic and seriously ask themselves if what they believe is true. For some people, thinking hurts and so they avoid it if they can. This often appears in politics. Caplan argues that, "Since delusional political beliefs are free, the voter consumes until he reaches his '[[Economic satiation|satiation point]],' believing whatever makes him feel best. When a person puts on his voting hat, he does not have to give up practical efficacy in exchange for self-image ''because he has no practical efficacy to give up in the first place.''"<ref name="Caplan"/>((rp|132))

===Relation to public choice theory===
The book is notable in use of irrationality, a rare assumption in economics. Yet the work is also a challenge to conventional [[public choice]], where voters are seen as [[rational ignorance|rationally ignorant]]. Conventional public choice either emphasizes the efficiency of [[democracy]] (as in the case of Donald Wittman) or, more commonly, democratic failure because of the interaction between self-interested [[politician]]s or [[bureaucrat]]s, well-organized, [[rent seeking|rent-seeking]] special interests and a largely indifferent general public (as in the work of [[Gordon Tullock]], [[James M. Buchanan]], and many others).

Caplan, however, emphasizes that democratic failure exists and places the blame for it squarely on the general public. He makes special emphasis that politicians are often caught between a rock and a hard place: thanks to advisors, they know what policies would be generally beneficial, but they also know that those policies are not what people want. Thus, they are balancing good economic policy, so they do not get voted out of office because of slow growth, and bad economic policy, so they do not get voted out of office because of unpopular policies.((Citation needed|date=September 2010))

==Reception==
===Popular press===
The book was reviewed in the popular press, including in ''[[The Wall Street Journal]]'',<ref>((cite news|url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB118401997995161399|title = Casting a Ballot With A Certain Cast of Mind|last = Casse|first = Daniel|date = 2007-07-10|accessdate = 2013-09-29|newspaper = [[Wall Street Journal]]))</ref> ''[[The New York Times]]'',<ref>((cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/27/magazine/27wwln-idealab-t.html?_r=0|title = Clueless|last = Bass|first = Gary J.|date = 2007-05-27|newspaper = [[New York Times]]|accessdate = 2013-09-29))</ref> and the ''[[The New Yorker|New Yorker]]''.<ref>((cite magazine|url=http://www.newyorker.com/arts/critics/books/2007/07/09/070709crbo_books_menand|title = Fractured Franchise Are the wrong people voting?|last = Menand|first = Louis|date = 2007-07-09|magazine = [[The New Yorker|New Yorker]]|accessdate = 2013-09-29))</ref> It was also briefly mentioned in ''[[Time Magazine]]''.<ref>((cite magazine|url=http://business.time.com/2007/04/26/the_myth_of_the_rational_whate/|title = The Myth of the Rational Whatever|last = Fox|first = Justin|date = 2007-04-26|accessdate = 2013-09-29|magazine = [[Time Magazine]]))</ref> Nicholas Kristof wrote in ''The New York Times'' that it was the "best political book of this year."<ref>((Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/30/opinion/30kristof.html|title=Opinion ((!)) The Voters Speak: Baaa!|last=Kristof|first=Nicholas|date=2007-07-30|work=The New York Times|access-date=2019-01-16|language=en-US|issn=0362-4331))</ref>

===Academic press===
The book received a mixed-to-positive review from [[Loren Lomasky]] in ''[[Public Choice]]'', co-inventor of the theory of "expressive voting" that was a close competitor to Caplan's theory of rational irrationality.<ref name=LomaskyReview>((cite journal|title = Swing and a myth: a review of Caplan's ''The Myth of the Rational Voter''|last = Lomasky|first = Loren|date = June 2008|doi=10.1007/s11127-007-9273-7|volume=135|issue = 3–4|journal=Public Choice|pages=469–84|s2cid = 153330363))</ref> Stuart Farrand wrote a critique of Caplan's book for ''Libertarian Papers''.<ref>((cite web|url=http://libertarianpapers.org/articles/2010/lp-2-28.pdf|title = Critique of Caplan's ''The Myth of the Rational Voter''|last = Farrand|first = Stuart|year = 2010|publisher = Libertarian Papers, Vol. 2, Article No. 28|accessdate = 2013-09-29))</ref> Gene Callahan reviewed the book for ''[[The Independent Review]]''.<ref>((cite journal|url=http://www.independent.org/publications/tir/article.asp?a=723|title = The Myth of the Rational Voter: Why Democracies Choose Bad Policies (book review)|last = Callahan|first = Gene|date = Winter 2009|accessdate = 2013-09-29|journal = [[The Independent Review]]))</ref> Prema Popat of [[Northeastern University|NorthEastern University]] and [[Benjamin Powell]] of [[Suffolk University]] jointly wrote a review of the book for ''New Perspectives on Political Economy''.<ref>((cite web|url = http://pcpe.libinst.cz/nppe/3_1/nppe3_1_8.pdf|title = Bryan Caplan: ''The Myth of the Rational Voter'' (book review)|last1 = Popat|first1 = Prema|last2 = Powell|first2 = Benjamin|year = 2007|publisher = New Perspectives on Political Economy|volume = 3|issue = 1|accessdate = 2013-10-13|url-status = dead|archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20120729171646/http://pcpe.libinst.cz/nppe/3_1/nppe3_1_8.pdf|archivedate = 2012-07-29))</ref>

Prior to publication of the book, Caplan had put forward the main thesis of the book as the lead essay in the November 2006 issue of ''[[Cato Unbound]]''.<ref name=cato-unbound>((cite web|url=http://www.cato-unbound.org/2006/11/06/bryan-caplan/the-myth-of-the-rational-voter/ |title=The Myth of the Rational Voter |publisher=Cato Unbound |date=2006-11-05 |accessdate=2013-08-17))</ref> Other participants in the debate, who critiqued various aspects of Caplan's thesis, included [[David Estlund]], [[Loren Lomasky]], and [[Jeffrey Friedman (political scientist)|Jeffrey Friedman]].<ref>((cite web|url=http://www.cato-unbound.org/issues/november-2006/majority-fools-irrationality-limits-democracy|title = Majority Fools? Irrationality and the Limits of Democracy|date = November 2006|accessdate = 2013-09-29|publisher = [[Cato Unbound]]))</ref>

The book received a mixed review from the [[libertarianism|libertarian]] [[Austrian economics|Austrian]] economist [[Walter Block]] in the ''[[Journal of Libertarian Studies]]''.<ref name=block>((cite web|url=https://mises.org/journals/jls/22_1/22_1_35.pdf|last = Block|first = Walter|title = The Myth of The Rational Voter (book review)|publisher = [[Journal of Libertarian Studies]]|volume= 22 |date=2011 |pages= 689–718|accessdate = 2013-09-29))</ref> Block was highly critical of Caplan's attempts to paint [[Austrian economics]] as a form of irrational free-market extremism. He also criticized Caplan for not referencing [[Hans-Hermann Hoppe]]'s book ''[[Democracy: The God That Failed]]'' that had a similar theme. Block's review was also published in [[LewRockwell.com]] and ''[[Psychology Today]]''.<ref>((cite web|url=http://archive.lewrockwell.com/block/block84.html|title = The Trouble With Democracy|last = Block|first = Walter|date = 2007-08-25|accessdate = 2013-10-13|publisher = [[LewRockwell.com]]))</ref><ref>((cite magazine|url = http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/defending-the-undefendable/201112/review-the-myth-the-rational-voter|title = Review of "The Myth of the Rational Voter": What's missing from this Bryan Caplan's critique of democracy|last = Block|first = Walter|date = 2011-12-25|accessdate = 2013-10-13|magazine = [[Psychology Today]]))</ref>

==Related books==
===Books published earlier===
* ''Democracy and Decision'' by [[Geoffrey Brennan]] and [[Loren Lomasky]], where the authors describe their "expressive voting" thesis in detail. Caplan's theory of [[rational irrationality]] is a close competitor to the theory offered here, and is in many ways similar. Lomasky wrote a review of Caplan's book.<ref name=LomaskyReview/>
* ''The Myth of Democratic Failure'' by Donald Wittman, the book that Caplan says was the impetus for writing his own book. Caplan included Wittman's book on his reading list, writing "This is the book that awoke me from my dogmatic [[public choice]] slumbers—and (negatively) inspired all of my work on [[rational irrationality|voter irrationality]]. It's a gift." Caplan and Wittman participated in a public debate shortly after Caplan's book was released.<ref>((cite web|url=http://econfaculty.gmu.edu/bcaplan/wittdeb.htm|title = Wittman-Caplan debate|accessdate = 2013-10-13))</ref>

===Books published later===
* ''[[The Ethics of Voting]]'' by [[Jason Brennan]], a 2011 book examining whether people have a moral obligation to vote. Brennan argued that people are not morally obliged to vote, but that if they do vote, they are obliged to vote responsibly. He argued that people who are not confident that they can vote well should refrain from voting. The final chapter of Brennan's book reviewed the evidence regarding whether people are generally well-qualified to make responsible voting decisions, and this chapter referenced ''The Myth of the Rational Voter''.
* ''[[Against Democracy]]'' by [[Jason Brennan]], a 2016 Princeton University Press book that challenges the belief that [[democracy]] is good and moral, and argues that the system does not produce good enough results. Furthermore, Brennan presents and defends different alternatives of "the rule of the knowledgeable" (epistocracy), where only the most knowledgeable voters get to elect the leaders.<ref name=":0">((Cite book|url=http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10843.html|title=Brennan, J.: Against Democracy (eBook and Hardcover).|publisher=press.princeton.edu|date=6 September 2016 |isbn=9780691162607 |access-date=2016-10-01))</ref> Caplan has endorsed the book.<ref name=":0" />

==See also==
* [[Criticism of democracy]]
* [[Behavioral economics]]

==References==
((Reflist))

((DEFAULTSORT:Myth Of The Rational Voter, The))
[[Category:2007 non-fiction books]]
[[Category:American non-fiction books]]
[[Category:Anarcho-capitalist books]]
[[Category:Books about bias]]
[[Category:Books about democracy]]
[[Category:Books about public opinion]]
[[Category:Economics books]]
[[Category:English-language books]]
[[Category:Princeton University Press books]]
[[Category:Public choice theory]]
[[Category:2000s books]]

Pages transcluded onto the current version of this page (help):

The Myth of the Rational Voter (edit)
Template:Abbr (view source) (protected)
Template:Both (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Catalog lookup link (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Category handler (view source) (protected)
Template:Citation needed (view source) (protected)
Template:Cite book (view source) (protected)
Template:Cite journal (view source) (protected)
Template:Cite magazine (view source) (protected)
Template:Cite news (view source) (protected)
Template:Cite web (view source) (protected)
Template:Delink (view source) (protected)
Template:Fix (view source) (protected)
Template:Fix/category (view source) (protected)
Template:ISBN (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:ISBNT (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Infobox (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Infobox book (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Longitem (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Main (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Main other (view source) (protected)
Template:Pagetype (view source) (protected)
Template:R/superscript (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:R/where (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Reflist (view source) (protected)
Template:Reflist/styles.css (view source) (protected)
Template:Rp (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:SDcat (view source) (protected)
Template:Short description (view source) (protected)
Template:Short description/lowercasecheck (view source) (protected)
Template:Template other (view source) (protected)
Template:Wikidata image (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Yesno (view source) (protected)
Template:Yesno-no (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Arguments (view source) (protected)
Module:Catalog lookup link (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Category handler (view source) (protected)
Module:Category handler/blacklist (view source) (protected)
Module:Category handler/config (view source) (protected)
Module:Category handler/data (view source) (protected)
Module:Category handler/shared (view source) (protected)
Module:Check for unknown parameters (view source) (protected)
Module:Check isxn (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Citation/CS1 (view source) (protected)
Module:Citation/CS1/COinS (view source) (protected)
Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration (view source) (protected)
Module:Citation/CS1/Date validation (view source) (protected)
Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers (view source) (protected)
Module:Citation/CS1/Utilities (view source) (protected)
Module:Citation/CS1/Whitelist (view source) (protected)
Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css (view source) (protected)
Module:DecodeEncode (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Delink (view source) (protected)
Module:Disambiguation/templates (view source) (protected)
Module:Format link (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:GetParameters (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Hatnote (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Hatnote/styles.css (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Hatnote list (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Infobox (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Infobox/styles.css (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:InfoboxImage (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Italic title (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Labelled list hatnote (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Namespace detect/config (view source) (protected)
Module:Namespace detect/data (view source) (protected)
Module:Pagetype (view source) (protected)
Module:Pagetype/config (view source) (protected)
Module:Pagetype/disambiguation (view source) (protected)
Module:Pagetype/rfd (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Pagetype/setindex (view source) (protected)
Module:Pagetype/softredirect (view source) (protected)
Module:Plain text (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:SDcat (view source) (protected)
Module:String (view source) (protected)
Module:String2 (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Template wrapper (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Unsubst (view source) (protected)
Module:Wikidata (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Wikitext Parsing (view source) (protected)
Module:Yesno (view source) (protected)

Return to The Myth of the Rational Voter.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Myth_of_the_Rational_Voter"