This is Ahmetlii's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7Auto-archiving period: 120 days

This user is aware of the designation of the following topics as contentious topics: He should not be given alerts for those areas.

This is Ahmetlii's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7Auto-archiving period: 120 days

Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 6 Archive 7

This page has archives. Sections older than 120 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present.

Hi there, I noticed that you have recently did a GA review of 79th Street station (IRT Broadway–Seventh Avenue Line), but passed the article as meeting all the GA criteria without any evidence of a review being done. If the article is already fully compliant with the GA criteria, justification will be needed as to why the article is compliant, usually done in a section by section breakdown. However, in most cases, there will be issues with the article, and a review of these issues should be provided on the review page for the nominator to fix during the hold period, after which if the issues are resolved the article will pass. An absence of a review is often seen as rubber stamping the GA and the review will normally be undone. I advise you to document a review of the article on the review page and raise any issues in the article if you find any. In the meanwhile you may want to leave the nominator a message that you will be reviewing the article again. If you need reference you can look at other completed GA reviews and also look at other similar GAs to use as a benchmark. 116th Street–Columbia University station is an article of a station on the same line that is already a GA and Cathedral Parkway–110th Street station (IRT Broadway–Seventh Avenue Line) is an article that is currently under review (by me). As I normally say if you don't find something wrong during a review something is wrong. If you have any further queries please so leave me a message on my talk page or ping me. Thanks Pentagon 2057 (T/C) 11:14, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pentagon 2057, thanks. I thought that I addressed the issues, and the issues has fixed. I also think that I said why I accepted it as a GA. Ahmetlii (talk) 11:18, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Ahmetlii: Ticking the GA checklist is not considered a review, in addition to that i see in an edit you made you added a citation needed tag, which contradicts your assessment that the article is well referenced. The article in this case should have been put on hold to allow the nominator to fix these issues. To allow for the nominator to fix these easily usually a list of issues that need to be resolved will be compiled on the review page along with discussions about these issues. Pentagon 2057 (T/C) 12:32, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You exported File:Somali President Sheik Sharif visits Balad Town 12 (7703057976) (cropped).jpg to Commons. Can/will you also ensure it remains in line with the local file? — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 22:49, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, the bot eventually updated it. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 07:08, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thank you for protecting my user page. Hatchens (talk) 04:03, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ahmetlii! I saw you left me a message about my edit on the Moronga page. I'm not sure if this is the way to send messages - I'm rather new to the Wikipedia format. What happened is I wanted to add Argentina as another country that had Moronga in our cuisine, but after further reading I realized Moronga and Morcilla (What we eat) are different things, so I deleted my edit. I don't know if my "Argentina" entry was restored, but I'm not sure it's accurate. Anyways, thanks for the message!

FioDeste (talk) 15:28, 9 February 2021 (UTC)FioDeste[reply]

FioDeste, okay, thanks very much for the message. Ahmetlii (talk) 15:31, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

My edit to that document was correct, there were 2 independent democrats in that election, which is where the 2 comes from, but Amos Tuck was also an independent in this election, and he was not an independent democrat. My source is the wikipedia page for the 30th US congress.

okay, thanks.Ahmetlii (talk) 19:06, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ahmetlii and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.

A few features that you might find helpful:

• Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
• The announcement and open task box is updated very frequently. You can watchlist it if you are interested, or you can add it directly to your user page by copying the following: ((WPMILHIST Announcements)).
• The project Academy has lots of useful information about editing and writing military history articles. One very useful introductory course to get you started is Writing a good stub.
• Important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
• The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, detailed article and content review, writing contests, and article logistics.
• We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, periods, and conflicts.
• We've developed a set of guidelines that cover article structure and content, template use, categorization, and many other issues of interest.
• If you're looking for something to work on, there are many articles that need attention, as well as a number of review alerts.
• If you would like to receive the project's monthly newsletter, The Bugle, please sign up here.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask any of the project coordinators or any other experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome, and we are looking forward to seeing you around! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 09:30, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Peacemaker67, you've welcomed me a few days ago, but thanks anyway. :) Ahmetlii (talk) 09:36, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I forgot! :-) Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 10:37, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Ahmetlii, the edits have been done so that Pashto stress and alphabet tranliteration is per Pashto Alphabets

PashtoPromoter (talk) 09:19, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

PashtoPromoter, oh okay then. I'm re-reverting my reverts. Ahmetlii (talk) 09:53, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like you've reverted it before me. Thanks! Ahmetlii (talk) 09:54, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Ahmetlii,

Thank for you message, and help. Could you please proofread my article about Headroom Studios? I understand the inherent conflict of interest, but Headroom Studios has been mentioned in other Wikipedia articles, and I thought it should have its own page. I feel that I have been as neutral and fact based as possible, but I am open to any other edits. Thank you!

Kyle Vassar84 (talk) 19:52, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On 18 February 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Kadir Topbaş, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Spencer^T•C 16:13, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you want to delete Hezhar Saleh article? All the claims have solid sources and he is a very famous singer Please delete it instead Correct it Thanks Aliasghar ghorbandokht (talk) 19:26, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Aliasghar ghorbandokht, first of all, you moved it from Draft page, which is not true per draft guidelines. Second, it's written like an advertisement with insufficient sources, which doesn't prove notability. And Wikipedia doesn't care being famous, Wikipedia cares the notability.Ahmetlii (talk) 20:15, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In the open Kurds and Kurdistan arbitration case, the proposed decision has now been posted. Please review this decision and draw the arbitrators' attention to any relevant material or statements. Comments may be brought to the attention of the committee on the proposed decision talk page. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. You were notified as you made comments in the case request. For the Arbitration Committee, Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 16:08, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An arbitration case regarding Kurds and Kurdistan has now closed and the final decision is viewable at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted:

• Standard discretionary sanctions are authorized for the topics of Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed.
• GPinkerton (talk · contribs) is indefinitely banned from the English Wikipedia. This ban may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.
• GPinkerton (talk · contribs) is topic-banned from articles related to Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed. This ban may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.
• Thepharoah17 (talk · contribs) is topic-banned from articles related to Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed. This ban may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.
• عمرو بن كلثوم (talk · contribs) is topic-banned from articles related to Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed. This ban may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.
• Supreme Deliciousness (talk · contribs) is topic-banned from articles related to Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed. This ban may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.
• Paradise Chronicle is warned to avoid casting aspersions and repeating similar uncollegial conduct in the future.

For the Arbitration Committee, Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 14:32, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard § Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Kurds and Kurdistan closed

Hello, Ahmetlii, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Ulasbardakci4677 (talk) 15:29, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]