![]() | This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Organic electronics. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Coasterlover1994Leave your mark! 22:28, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
Salaam!. Why are they unconstructive?. Remember, you have to assume good faith and give a reason. --Hamiltha (talk) 12:41, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Fill factor. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. — Jeff G. ツ 04:55, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
This is the final warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits, such as this edit you made to Photovoltaic micro-inverter. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing without further notice. — Jeff G. ツ 05:00, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. — Jeff G. ツ 05:31, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
I have added my doubts about the, sometimes, obscure concepts and terminology used in the articles, to every article talk page. --Hamiltha (talk) 13:25, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi Hamiltha, it's not clear why you added a move proposal to the Oil well page. There was already a discussion in May. The result was 'page not moved: speedy close'. It might help if you explained on the article talk page where you are getting this 'fossil fuel well' terminology from, who uses it, how it complies with WP:NAME ? Sean.hoyland - talk 09:27, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Fossil fuel drilling. Since you had some involvement with the Fossil fuel drilling redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Beagel (talk) 05:18, 7 August 2010 (UTC)