This user is aware of the designation of the following topics as contentious topics: India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan the Arab–Israeli conflict He should not be given alerts for those areas.

Archives

Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20

Kautilya3, I believe you are the right person to ask as you are experienced. Please create an article with the title, "Minority appeasement in India". There are many things happening and this is just one instance.

Hi, Kautilya3

A anonymous user just put a randon kill number of claims by china replacing the previous number, can you revert his/her recent edit pls? Swtadi143 (talk) 13:49, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

我想無論中國指的是中華民國，還是中華人民共和國，東沙群島屬於中國是沒有爭議的吧！

也許你要說不，是台灣，但實際並沒有任何以台灣為正式稱呼的國家，現在稱呼為台灣的國家，就是中華民國，中國的舊政府，而且除了中華民國，東沙群島并沒有任何其他爭議國家。也和西方無任何關係吧！那麽爲什麽要用一個西方的名字，而不用爭議雙方都能接受的名稱呢？就像如果當初東德和西德對西柏林聲稱主權時，國際上爲了“中立”，稱呼其為“xibolin”而不是“West Berlin”一樣荒謬！Nkywvuong (talk) 10:35, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The English Wikipedia summarises the information contained in English language reliable sources. All other political battles do not affect this criterion. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 10:38, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Jurat on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:30, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Dictator on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:30, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't the first deletion discussion be at Talk:Umayyad campaigns in India? Looks like someone did a copy paste move. Is Battle of Kangra also a part of the same campaign? --RegentsPark (comment) 22:59, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi RP, we already discussed it before renaming the page. There should have been a redirect left around under the old title. I don't know what happened to it.

Battle of Kangra is unrelated, even though that seems to be an equally bad page. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 23:05, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ah. I see that Utcursch didn't leave a redirect behind when he moved it. BTW, nice picture above. --RegentsPark (comment) 23:24, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if you are aware, but reverting posts to talk pages is an infringement of wiki policy. I realise that you are a fairly new user, but 7 years is surely enough. Anyway, I suggest you check this out with a view to avoiding future infringements. Achar Sva (talk) 03:33, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Xaidulla shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
A slow-motion edit war is still and WP:EW. Toddst1 (talk) 19:00, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Toddst1, thanks for finding all those old socks and listing them! -- Kautilya3 (talk) 21:12, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've also requested page protection as that editor was blocked 11 years ago! but the infinitely wise have declined my request. Toddst1 (talk) 23:33, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hii Mr. Kautliya, Since you are an expert in history, Can you please take a look at Rajput resistance to Muslim conquests article and fix some puffery and mistakes in recent addition.2402:8100:2169:D2C0:9ADC:D2C7:96DB:662F (talk) 13:30, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]