![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
[Title width guide. Delete above here if no further edits - already in archive. If further edits, move below here.]
You have one. Feel free to reply here if you want, no worries. Cheers! O Fortuna!...Imperatrix mundi. 16:37, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
What do we do when a page is promotional, is tagged, but then the creator blanks the page, so removing the promotion and the tag from the page (which of course he shouldn't do) - do they cancel each other out? Like, the tags gone, but so is the promotional material? thank for the advice. O Fortuna!...Imperatrix mundi. 16:37, 15 February 2017 (UTC) [by email]
Sorry RH, I just thought you didn't appreciate getting unecessary messages here. Thanks for that though. Blindingly obvious as you say- I was distracted by the promo aspects rather than the simple fact of author deletion. I'll remember that, cheers, O Fortuna!...Imperatrix mundi. 18:57, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
@RHaworth: One more thing - if it was a user talkpage that had the spam / tag on it and was then blanked? Still U1 but with the mandatory rationale? Thanks again! O Fortuna!...Imperatrix mundi. 15:07, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for that ((ping|RHaworth)) ;) -all it was, as I was replying to an old message half way up your page, rather than starting a new section. Cheers for the info. So the important thing is preserving the preservable history. Check. I wasn't thinking so much of archives though- haven't encounterd that yet. Perhaps luckily enough. But this was the cause of my question- where the page had been blanked, tag removed, but the promo material is still in the history. Although there's nothing else in the history apart from the tag. Alright. Thanks again, O Fortuna!...Imperatrix mundi. 14:13, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Like, nuke from orbit. That's wot some say. Did you see Cronx. Zapped! :) — O Fortuna!...Imperatrix mundi. 21:58, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
If we'd known it was your local we would have conferred immediate notability upon it :) Escape from the Cronx!
Croydon. The Cartoon Club. Some years ago; is it still there? — O Fortuna!...Imperatrix mundi. 15:15, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
It was 2006. The Fall. Four night residency. Days on railway, nights of glory :) not. Right: new email on your way. Will leave the thing at the bottom of your page instead of half way through it. — O Fortuna!...Imperatrix mundi. 20:12, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Change of plan; email no longer required. Cheers! 🍸 O Fortuna!...Imperatrix mundi. 09:35, 25 February 2017 (UTC) New something similar. — here- advice appreciated?! Cheers — O Fortuna! Imperatrix mundi. 06:32, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
Right- thanks for that! — O Fortuna! Imperatrix mundi. 17:17, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi! I'm somewhat new to Wikipedia (as a poster) but I wanted to know why you took down my Justin Anthony page? For reasoning, you put down "copyright infringement" along with this link (http://www.mi2n.com/press.php3?press_nb=166440). While these two people have the same name, it is not the same Justin Anthony. Is there something I should be doing differently to change this? - 12:48 March 13 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shirkeab (talk • contribs) 16:46, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
Good afternoon, My purpose for contacting you is to ask why, in your own words, the Mandela effect Wikipedia page was taken down and ultimately to ask you to please reinstate it. I am an admin for the largest membered Mandela effect page on Facebook where we are steadily approaching 22,000 members at this time and the page being deleted has troubled many of our members. As for the purpose of its deletion being stated that the article had no meaningful, substantive content is not entirely up to you or whomever it was to decide. This is a very sensitive subject matter where it has not received much, if any, coverage through mainstream media sources and many who do run across the subject turn to more "credible" sites such as Wikipedia to get a better foundational understanding of what exactly the matter entails. Also, I notice controversial results when searching "Mandela Effect Wikipedia" as the two leading results are "False memories" and "Confabulation" but I won't bother you on that matter as I'm sure you don't have any control of that. Being so, I politely ask that you reinstate the page or direct me to someone who can. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Luke1132 (talk • contribs)
Can you also delete the mandela effect because that continues to be redirect to false memory. Thanks -- Jack Upland (talk) 01:40, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I would like to contest the deletion of this page Peer5. I think that speedy deletion criteria have not been met. Primarily, the page created had reputable, industry relevant sources, and the article topic is a well-known company in its industry. In addition, Wikipedia already has similar articles about companies in the same industry. So, I think that the first speedy deletion criteria was not met, ie, A7. As for G11, I'm ready to remedy that if my complain is taken into consideration. Thank you -- Reollun (talk) 10:50, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi Roger, Please could you kindly send me the text for the following article of mine that you deleted - Draft:Advantage Testing. I understand your reasons for deleting, as it appears to be simply marketing for a company. So I wish to rewrite the article in an unbiased, objective manner. Many thanks for your assistance and for giving your time to Wikipedia - it's a tremendous resource. Best wishes, James — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jameslox (talk • contribs) 11:56, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
This request came in from Gamebuster19901. I have no real opinion on whether it should be created or not, but thought I should notify you since you did the last G4. — TonyBallioni (talk) 17:12, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
You could've just created the page Template:Playmates of 2017 as requested and improve the wiki. But why be helpful when deleting is so much fun, eh. — 95.90.220.201 (talk) 18:04, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Yes, that seems to be credibly significant enough. — SwisterTwister talk 20:06, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Do you mind unprotecting 🔞? There's a WP:AFC/R request to create it as a redirect to Content rating, because it literally is a content rating, regardless of the age-of-majority issues that were relevant at the more recent RFD. If you were inactive, I'd readily unprotect it myself, but of course I don't want to step on toes. — Nyttend (talk) 23:51, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Help me urgent that this article Amaruk Kayshapanta is not erased or deleted, I am new to wikipedia I still have some difficulties, but I have already corrected and edited again. I say goodbye waiting for positive news, thank you -- Gatita Estrella10 (talk) 06:03, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
New stub - I found when I tried to move it to correct title that you'd deleted and salted Speeder Razor in Dec 2015, so you might like to have a look. — PamD 11:27, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
I was surprised to see you had deleted the user page for Sander.v.Ginkel yesterday on the grounds that it is a "fake article". I can assure you that many editors on the English wiki have written user pages in the same way but have not (yet) suffered the same fate. Please restore the page as many would like to see the profile of someone who has been banned for the time being but whose BLP articles are still receiving attention as drafts. I see for example that Kudpung's user page has been drafted along the same lines. Should this be blanked too? -- Ipigott (talk) 14:37, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi: Thanks for coming in on this so quickly and for your interesting observation. I'm not so sure what you mean by "hatted" but I would point out that unlike Kudpung's, S.v.G's page had a header clearly explaining it was a user page and not a Wikipedia article. But it was still deleted. -- 15:11, 24 February 2017 (UTC)Ipigott (talk)
Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi: I see. Well, if that's what's bothering you, how about Plucas58? But maybe we should just wait patiently for our friend RH to return. He's usually very understanding. -- Ipigott (talk) 15:27, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
As I have explained above there are many user pages written in the third person which have the appearance of articles. Although many such pages provide general background about the user and follow the kind of display used in main-space biographies, the ones I have seen include descriptions of the user's work on Wikipedia. On re-examining S.v.G's page, I have to agree with you that there was no mention of his Wikipedia activities. It therefore does indeed coincide with rules on "fake articles" and I agree that you took the correct action in deleting the page.--Ipigott (talk) 09:43, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
There was plenty of context, as shown by a Google translation. Nor was the article very short. I do not think A1 applied here. Adam9007 (talk) 00:40, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
What was the text of User:ㅂㄱㅇ/1? Can I know that? --
I was translating from Korean to create new articles in English Wikipedia, but some templates I used in that page don't exist in Korean Wikipedia. --
How about history? I lost all history of that page. --
In User:ㅂㄱㅇ/0, you deleted some edits, but why did you delete all of User:ㅂㄱㅇ/1? --
I've used translation tool, but I thought it's hard to use wiki markup in that tool, so I used my user subpage. --
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect how can a tram route cross a trolley bus route without short circuits. Since you had some involvement with the how can a tram route cross a trolley bus route without short circuits redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Exemplo347 (talk) 09:26, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
For the gazillionth time, thanks again! Paine Ellsworth put'r there 18:31, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Can you give me text that I posted that was deleted today from Health at Every Size? Thanks so much. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HAES108 (talk • contribs) 20:59, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi, I was given permission by the owner of the photo to upload and use File:Jasmar Cassar Just Be.jpg how can you un-delete it? If needed, I can show the email which I received from Mr. Cassar (Mr. Cassar has the full rights of File:Jasmar Cassar Just Be.jpg) which shows that the picture can be used and shared freely. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JeanMarion (talk • contribs) 21:23, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi! Can уоu undelete this redirect: Province of Aosta? You speedied it as WP:G7, but it was not blanked by its author, it was blanked by totally different user. — Vanjagenije (talk) 13:55, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Greetings - I think you may have sent an email to me that was intended for someone else! Regards Exemplo347 (talk) 15:28, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Ha, sorry for my overly quick response! Exemplo347 (talk) 16:08, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello my friend. I am missing something obvious, but why delete here? And if you need background on rapper odg, please say. I've been blocking and deleting that for ages. P.S. I am half asleep and about to go to bed, so, again, I may be missing somethign obvious. I usually am. :) Best, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 12:29, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Okay, I think I see. I modified Batting the dab page. Padding, eh? Was there a discussion? Batting, I thought, is the normal term. — Anna Frodesiak (talk) 12:34, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Okay, I've added content and source to the lead of Padding to mention batting. I am pleased that batting (material) is restored because there were a ton of articles that linked to it. Best, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:25, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi there. I was told that the you had deleted file:Wei Han Headshot.jpg uploaded because it had media file copyright violation without credible claim of fair use or permission. The uploader wished to convey to you that the license should have been "Own work, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0." Could you please restore it? Thanks.Supermann (talk) 03:28, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
You say: 00:04, 2 March 2017 RHaworth (Talk | contribs) deleted page London Treaty (disambiguation) (G6: This page is a redirect with " (disambiguation)" in its title that does not target a dab page and for which a suitable dab page cannot be found)
However, I think what you say was inaccurate. However, as you have deleted the page, I am unable to tell.
I need more information please. Pdfpdf (talk) 13:39, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
This user is a Grumpy Old Man (You've been warned!) |
My my! "Utterly pointless" and "absolutely unnecessary". You are not one for understatement, are you!
Had it not occurred to you that there just might possibly be a good reason for the existence of this situation, a good reason for the rule book specifically catering for it, and a good reason for the existence of a bot that creates such pages? (Or failing "good reason", then "good enough reason"?) Well, never mind. Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 10:15, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
(BTW & FYI: The deletion proposer has come to the conclusion that his nomination was in error - Refer Talk:Treaty of London#This is not a dab page.) Pdfpdf (talk) 10:15, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
mail, sorry about that. — O Fortuna!...Imperatrix mundi. 13:41, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
Luckily an object lesson sometimes suffices. — O Fortuna!...Imperatrix mundi. 08:11, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
I only emailed you to annoy you
Only kidding sorry :) in the first case, is there anything I could've done at the time, rather than letting you know two days later or whatever it was? And as for rulebooks... isn't that what WP:IAR is all about? Take care, — O Fortuna! Imperatrix mundi. 10:59, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi, I want to clarify that you have deleted article without any reason. I added 27 Refferences which were from Top sites. There was nothing about advertising or promotion. Also I have not added anything promotional. Kindly restore the article and help me where I promoting anything? As you said, It is my first article. No...It is not first. Please review your action and respect the others work. RHaworth — Preceding unsigned comment added by LARZZE (talk • contribs) 14:17, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
Dear, Kindly inform me why you have deleted my article Zaki Ameer. It is not promotional and advertising. If you think this is advertising, then please help me to edit this article. Kindly check the notability of the person. At least being a senior, you should help me instead of killing me. I hope you understand how painful it is. — Preceding unsigned comment added by LARZZE (talk • contribs) 14:34, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
Hey, My draft Draft:Fifteen-ball pool was flagged for speedy deletion for copyright infringement of this page: https://alberta55plus.ca/rules/pool-8-ball/ I would like to have said draft restored so that I can move it to my sandbox. I submitted the draft while it was incomplete, accidentally, as I had other things to attend to (newbie mistake). I also had no intention to infringe upon that webpage's copyright. The entirety of what I had wrote was only intended to model the wording of the first paragraph of the wikipedia article for Eight-ball Thanks for your time, AbsconditumEtIncognitum (talk) 23:00, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
Done. — AbsconditumEtIncognitum (talk) 20:46, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
Why did you delete 2017-18 NCAA Division I Men's Basketall season because it's too soon but why did you do this? — 68.102.39.189 (talk) 02:51, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
Just a head's up that I think Mohamed Rafi Puthukkudi has been recreated since your speedy delete close at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohamed Rafi Puthukkudi. — Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:16, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
Please reinstate this draft immediately. It is being used to prepare edits for the extant article and represent many tens of hours of work. The present page is large and has both structural and accuracy problems. Some of the work, for example the section on power calculations, has been fed back into the main article, and lot more is expected to follow shortly. This is all explained in the logs and talk pages of both the published article and the draft. Consequently I find the deletion completely inexplicable. — Malcolm Boura (talk) 19:10, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
I wonder if you could expand on your reasons for deleting the above article under CSD G1, which explictly excludes "coherent non-English material, or poorly translated material"? It seems to be a coherent piece of work, albeit not in English. Or is there some other reason for deletion that I've missed and I'm not seeing? — Lankiveil (speak to me) 13:28, 3 March 2017 (UTC).
Hello there RHaworth, I have a quick question for you/request, could you please delete the two redirects I nominated for deletion (listed here: User talk:TheSandDoctor/Archive 2 (Requested deletion of own works))? The reasoning for the request is that one of the two was made by accident (TheSandDoctor/Peter_Bell_(Reichstag)) as I forgot to remove the TheSandDoctor/ prefix (as it was created as a user page) and I do not think anyone would think to search for TheSandDoctor/Peter_Bell_(Reichstag) and the second one is on similar reasoning that I doubt anyone will look for Peter Bell (Reichstag) in User:TheSandDoctor/Peter_Bell_(Reichstag). From my judgement, both redirects fall under Wikipedia:Redirect#When_should_we_delete_a_redirect.3F #1.
Thanks for your time!
TheSandDoctor (talk) 18:18, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
@RHaworth: Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheSandDoctor (talk • contribs)
Hi RHaworth, It looks like you deleted a new page I created. I'm new to wikipedia, so I may not have followed the best/correct publishing process.
Regarding the reasons you deleted this page, i would like to let you know that there is no copyright infringement issue as: 1) The European Commission has published the methodology with an "open source" license (EUPL) which is more or less equivalent to the creative commons (CC) license. This is indicated in the first few pages of the publication.
I realize that I may not have made this clear in the wikipedia text (so you may have missed it in the first pages of the PDF publication). I'm also providing you with this source: https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/node/153404 where you will find towards the bottom of the page the following copyright statement: "The PM² Guide - Open Edition is published with a full share and reuse EUPL Licence, and is positioned to become an open source project management methodology. This means that reproduction and reuse is authorised provided the source is acknowledged."
So I would like to request that you un-delete the page and give me some tips on how I can avoid this happening again by another editor. I also read your tips on how to activate my wikipedia-emailbox so you can email me the content. Or move back to my sandbox. I spend several hours creating this content, so I don't want to risk loosing it. Thanks for your time! Nicos. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nkouroun (talk • contribs)
Ok - thanks - In the mean time, could you please send me the page text? Can you please put back in my sandbox?. — nkouroun 08:16, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi. I linked to the article which you speedily deleted back in February. Not sure if this is an issue, but I don't have the tools to look into, not even sure if it is something that needs looking into. User:LivingLegend 7 is a new editor which has had some problematic edits in their brief time. They have recreated the above article, this time as Remorse eSports, which another editor has tagged for speedy deletion. That's not the issue. When I went back to the editors' contributions, I noticed something strange. The tag that the original article was to be deleted is dated 28 February. However, looking at their history, it shows them starting on 1 March. Strange. Not sure it's an issue, but it looks like someone might be trying to hide something. Thought someone might like to look into it, take care. Onel5969 TT me 14:07, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
Thanks Arjayay - of course if the page got deleted, his edits would also go away. Duh. Onel5969 TT me 14:50, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello RHaworth, we are currently leading an edithaton in Paris. Could you restore the page you deleted, your deletion seems to have broken our ongoing work. We (few confirmed French users and admins) will check out for the possible copyvio, but please let us few hours to work peacefully. -- Yug (talk) 14:47, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
User:BonellaH seems to be a promising contributor, we try to retrieve the translation just done. -- Yug (talk) 14:49, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
Thanks RHaworth, seems we successfully retrieve our translation. 80% of the article is done, we push for for the 100% :D Please feel free to watch the page so we solve your concerns later on. -- Yug (talk) 14:54, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
Problem is back as soon as you delete the page. -- Yug (talk) 14:58, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
We are translating using a wikimedia tool, our work is binded to the User:BonellaH/sandbox page, as soon as it get deleted we cannot work and lost access to our work. -- Yug (talk) 15:01, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello RHaworth, no evil intent from me. I've been running around for that editathon and I don't have internet access at home to polish things up on my private evening. I made a mistake when kick starting the translation... my bad sorry. I made is the old way, as I/we used to do around 2012. Things have changed, I'am catching up. Yug (talk) 15:48, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I'm not sure if there is a way for you remember my patrolling experience from my username (I do your's since I receive email notifications of page deletion from your end for the ones I tag via CSD). In any case, if you do, would you please consider endorsing my request for 'New Page Patroller' rights (which has been denied for now) - here? However, if you think that I do not have sufficient experience, I would understand and re-apply once I do.
Thanks for your time.
TopCipher (talk) 10:07, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
@RHaworth: Thank you for your consideration! TopCipher (talk) 05:05, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
Would you be willing to take a look at this permissions request that was declined by Kudpung? I've posted to Kudpung's talk page regarding the matter of getting a third opinion, and since you just recently did this, I figured you might do it again. While I'm not an admin and I'm not super experienced in permissions discussions and so forth, I can't help but question Kudpung's judgement on this one. It would be much appreciated if you could provide another opinion. Thanks. R. A. Simmons Talk 20:16, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
Could you please take a look at Draft:Konrad Hennemann as it has not been edited since 16 October 2015? I nominated it but was undone as was said to be an invalid request? -- TheSandDoctor (talk) 00:01, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
Restore my post with the prooer suggestions. Its for a class assignment and you keep deleting it. Restore my post. — Hyde8228 (talk) 02:38, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
CHIRLA Barrio Profile You deleted my page for simpy not having the correct cotation for the background info, <http://chirla.org/about%20us> Would you restore my page with the correct citation. It has been annoyingly been deleted various times. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hyde8228 (talk • contribs) 02:47, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
What business do you have deleting pages from my user space as vandalism? These were my personal study notes! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Robert Towers (talk • contribs) 03:02, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
I suggest you look at the pages you wrongfully deleted again, as it is impossible for you to discern my intentions for this material. If you must know, I am collecting this information in order to create a new article on Wikipedia. Please restore them, stay away from my pages, and stop abusing your role here. — Robert Towers (talk) 23:55, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
Because all of my notes and article drafts were deleted, several by her and another by this guy. She informed me that I was inadvertently duplicating category links and that is why they were removed. — Robert Towers (talk) 12:31, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
Never mind. I'll take my work elsewhere. Goodbye. Robert Towers (talk) 20:58, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
That was not a request for deletion, it was a request to leave me alone! You have caused me enough headache, are you done yet? It is not your job to impose deadlines on me or to judge how "useful" I am! All material supposedly in copyright violation was removed. I did not ask you to delete my page. I just wanted you to stop trying to boss me around. That's not what Wikipedia is for, and you are acting out of line. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Robert Towers (talk • contribs) 00:10, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
(talk page stalker) What Robert forgot to mention is that his sandbox was called User:Robert Towers/Eat my faaaaarrrrt, and perhaps that's why he avoided the request to link the page he was complaining about. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:05, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
Good Afternoon Roger - I was wondering if you might be willing to send me the details on the page that you recently deleted on HMCS Prince Robert. While I acknowledge that I first plagiarized another website's work, I was in the process of amending the page to be in my own words with my own references to other sites. In hindsight, I should have created /edited it in the sandbox before publishing officially. Please accept my most remorseful regrets. — PhoenixAF24 (talk) 12:25, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
Thank you so much for sending this to me. I will make the appropriate changes and repost. PhoenixAF24 (talk) 14:40, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
Why you deleted my work on wikipedia? Whats the reason ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.231.248.199 (talk) 19:05, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
You deleted my file without even letting me defend it, if my knowledge of the rules is correct, you cannot do that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Schwiiz (talk • contribs) 15:40, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
The one on Dr. Jackson Crawford's curriculum for clarification. &mdsh; Schwiiz (talk) 15:42, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi RHaworth. You deleted User:Robert Towers per WP:G12, but as you can see it seems to have been recreated. It has been suggested on the User talk:Robert Tower#Draft articles that this content might be more suitable for the draft namespace or a user sandbox, but the editor might be misunderstanding what that means. Is there a point in tagging this for speedy again? -- Marchjuly (talk) 03:07, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi, You have deleted my page underPayandehnasser. Why is this? I reviewed the T&C's and cannot see where this contradicts them. Please can you advise further, thank you. (U5: Misuse of Wikipedia as a web host).Payandehnasser (talk) 14:33, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
Could you please look at User:Sir7 16/sandbox and User:Pierat567/sandbox to determine if they are worthy of deletion? Thanks! --TheSandDoctor (talk) 17:49, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
Edit: Draft:Utz Claassen as well please --TheSandDoctor (talk) 17:52, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
TheSandDoctor, yes that is what I am saying. ~ GB fan 00:23, 14 March 2017 (UTC)