Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to E.A.T. (TV program), please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Thanks, Framawiki (please notify me when you reply) 23:44, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. -WayKurat (talk) 10:35, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please elaborate on the format you want this page to be in.

overview

hosts/cast

show segments

ratings

notes.......

The segments I added should be included because they actually aired on E.A.T. Let's be fair. I have no intention of taking sides with anyone and all knowledge about the show is there. Thank you and God bless you. just explain to me where the violations in the segments and episodes aired on E.A.T. with legitimate sources. Theresunset (talk) 11:50, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Only include the segments because the page deals with variety shows. and that is my view. just forget on the special episodes if thats the policy of wikipedia.i'm sorry thats my fault.but the segments should be included its a variety show. Theresunset (talk) 11:55, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; however, please remember the essential rule of respecting copyrights. Edits to Wikipedia, such as your edit to the page Carren Eistrup, may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless that text is available under a suitable free license. It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though you can clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed. For more information on this, see:

• Copying text from other sources
• Policy on copyright
• Frequently asked questions on Wikipedia's copyright policy
• Policy and guideline on non-free content

If you still have questions, there is the Teahouse, or you can click here to ask a question on your talk page and someone will be along to answer it shortly. As you get started, you may find the pages below to be helpful.

• Introduction
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! — Diannaa (talk) 13:12, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

what will happen on the page. Sorry, my intentions are pure and I just want to convey information. Theresunset (talk) 23:03, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page E.A.T. (TV program), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 11:55, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Tugue Zombie, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hughesdarren (talk) 05:49, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tugue Zombie and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 10:16, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Theresunset! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 10:16, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Paolo Contis, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 03:14, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Paolo Contis, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL" error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 03:14, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ThisIsSeanJ. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to It's Showtime (Philippine TV program) seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ThisIsSeanJ (talk) 07:56, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Have more point of view. i will no longer write on that page anymore. I think its neutral nothing seems wrong with that. Theresunset (talk) 09:58, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Editors are expected to treat each other with respect and civility. On this encyclopedia project, editors assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not appear to do at E.A.T. (TV program). Here is Wikipedia's welcome page, and it is hoped that you will assume the good faith of other editors and continue to help us improve Wikipedia! The edit summaries for the following edits are not appropriate: [1] [2] [3] Please assume good faith: that other editors are here on Wikipedia to improve it. Mr. Gerbear|Talk 16:46, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Theresunset! Your additions to E.A.T. (TV program) have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. You are not allowed to just copy-paste material from offsite, even from other wikis. You are also not allowed to upload copyrighted material, such as the images you used in the article. Thank you. Mr. Gerbear|Talk 16:39, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Joey de Leon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page TV5. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just because the host said P.I. accidentally on the show doesn't mean we have to censor it out of the article. We have a policy here against censorship; unless if it's something illegal such as child pornography we do not in most cases censor things out of prudishness or for religious reasons. Thank you. Blake Gripling (talk) 02:54, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Eat Bulaga. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. TheHotwiki (talk) 19:00, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Theresunset. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Eat Bulaga!, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the ((edit COI)) template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Seawolf35 (talk) 09:06, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Blakegripling ph. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to E.A.T. (TV program) seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Blake Gripling (talk) 12:40, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You, the editor, Blakegripling ph., sided with the other rival show because your revisions were against the show. it's not appropriate for you to edit, I'll let you but I'll edit the right one, don't be biased. Theresunset (talk) 12:55, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Theresunset - Your response here is unacceptable. You're clearly demonstrating article ownership of this article by saying, "it's not appropriate for you to edit, I'll let you but I'll edit the right one". Let me be clear: This article does not belong to you. This article can be edited by any user. You do not have any authority to tell other editors if they can edit the article, where, when, etc. Your statement to Blakegripling ph saying that he "sided with the other rival show is casting aspersions, and is not in compliance with Wikipedia's civility policy, as well as the policy forbidding personal attacks toward other editors. This behavior is to stop immediately. If I see one more response or comment that violates Wikipedia policy as I described in this message, I will block your ability to edit this article. I hope this warning was clear. If you have questions or need clarification on anything, please let me know. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 03:03, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The subject simply mentioned LUBID without adding any words of suicide. Besides, netizens/detractors just connect as suicide. Blake gripping.ph, you exaggerate the content of your revisions which means you are not on the neutral side.Theresunset (talk) 13:15, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

biased revisions Theresunset (talk) 13:19, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Blake Gripling (talk) 01:29, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blakegripping ph is a biased editor. The changes I made were on the neutral side. And said editor makes edits that already affect the reputation of the subject to which he can be seen to take sides. I denounced his teasing treatment of me that I even looked bad for giving a detailed revision that didn't offend anyone. He's obviously on the side of someone and he's against this page. please review his edits. Theresunset (talk) 01:41, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, this editor is on the side of its showtime and one to be considered as detractors of the show E.A.T because of his exaggerated revisions and against the neutrality of this page. Theresunset (talk) 01:43, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I feel frustrated with this editor because he's not making this page neutral on both sides instead he's dragging the subject reputation by exaggerating the articles content. Theresunset (talk) 01:46, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I would suggest addressing the ANI case instead of continuing to cast aspersions like this. Unless if you've got evidence that Blakegripling is connected to MTRCB I'd advise you stop saying they have a COI. Personalising edit disputes with claims of bias and conflicts of interest is ill advised and may lead to a block for combative behaviour CiphriusKane (talk) 02:53, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are obviously reversing the circumstances where you are obviously attacking the personalities included on this page. The editing should summarize the events that happened, that you despise people, for example, you just did the title supposedly issue of the rope joke, you input Suicide, those are the exaggerated revisions that you do, and I will not allow you to do that to damage the reputation of other people. Theresunset (talk) 01:35, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm here to contribute on this page and your attitude is immoral and rude. You treat me bad as editor like you. Theresunset (talk) 01:49, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Biased edit :and alleging a double standard and conflict of interest on part of the MTRCB for suspending rival noontime program It's Showtime due to an alleged indecent act made by Vice Ganda and Ion Perez. What kind of editor is he? Blakegripling, please refer to the article; no issue has been addressed about the alleged double standard and conflict of interest of MRTCB.Theresunset (talk) 01:54, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

This revision of BlakeGripling obvious means that hes on the side of the rival show. How could he exaggerate the content of the article where he emphasised the fault of MTRCB for the suspension of the rival show when in fact the subject is all about the de Leons rope joke, the E.A.T. show, and Netizens call on incident review for MTRCB investigation. How he could centre the attention of others shows controversy taking on their side. Theresunset (talk) 02:25, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]