Hello, Wedit00179, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as 420 AWARDS Show, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type ((help me)) on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 12:51, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
The article 420 AWARDS Show has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non notable event
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 12:51, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Romeo + Juliet, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 16:09, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
Share your experience in this survey
Hi Wedit00179,
The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikipedia and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 15:36, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
Share your experience in this survey
Hi Wedit00179,
A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 15:35, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
Share your experience in this survey
Hi Wedit00179,
There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 20:32, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Sonic hedgehog has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:36, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~))
. Alexf(talk) 10:45, 30 December 2020 (UTC)Please do not create hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at Social Night. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 03:17, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you create an inappropriate page, as you did at Social Night. Any further vandalism will result in an indefinite block as a vandalism-only account. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:04, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Jamesluiz102. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Wonder Woman 1984—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Jamesluiz102 (talk) 01:59, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to User:Jamesluiz102. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — csc-1 02:02, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Mattplaysthedrums (talk) 02:06, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~))
. GeneralNotability (talk) 02:13, 27 April 2021 (UTC)This page should not be speedily deleted because... as a wikipedia user I am deserving of my own page just like anyone else.
Consider this a warning, stop abusing your talk page. — csc-1 02:16, 27 April 2021 (UTC)