![]() | An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Waterjuice (talk · contribs · logs). Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful. Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth |
![]() | An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Wastful (talk · contribs · logs). Please refer to editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful. Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth |
Welcome!
Hello, Willydick, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place ((helpme))
before the question. Again, welcome!
Geronimo20 (talk) 10:22, 19 June 2004 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Fishing, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Geronimo20 (talk) 08:39, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
Yes, I am. Glad you like them. Nirvana888 (talk) 01:45, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
Do not delete fair comments related to vandalism as you deleted the one above.
Not quite sure why you reverted my edit. This was changed quite a while ago, to accurately reflect the sources. Whether or not it is your opinion that Manhattan is or is not a major cultural, media, or financial center of the world, Wikipedia is based on sources, and the cited sources recognize it as such.Basket548 (talk) 06:17, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
^ Barry, Dan. " A Nation challenged: in New York; New York Carries On, but Test of Its Grit Has Just Begun", The New York Times, October 11, 2001. Accessed December 22, 2007. "A roaring void has been created in the financial center of the world." Please stop changing. Basket548 (talk) 07:47, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
And not to belabor the point, but why do you feel that it needs changing? The article states that Manhattan is a (not the) major center of worldwide finance, culture, and media. What exactly is wrong with that? Basket548 (talk) 07:56, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Now why did you revert my edit there? Yours was grammatically incorrect and it's all I fixed. I'm not trying to get into a pissing match; I just want Wikipedia to be as accurate and grammatically correct as possible. Basket548 (talk) 07:51, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
You need to read the instuctions for 'morecitations'. These are not errors, but notices that the articles need improvment. Your edits may be considerd vandalism. Hmains (talk) 21:48, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
...I was about to ask if you were reading the same article as everyone else... -- roleplayer 00:59, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
Your recent edits and changes to the Santa Clara County article have been rolled back, due to problems with missing data and grammatical errors. Namely, your "clean-up" edit removed election data from the Government and politics section of the article, and there were also unnecessary graphics resizings and moves. The next edit changed the grammatically correct "Bay area of the state" to "Bay area in the state".
Please do not remove content from Wikipedia articles without stating a good reason why you are removing the content in the edit descriptor, or if there is not enough room there, on the article's associated talk page. Further, I believe the graphics resizing has already been covered up further on this talk page, and the reasons why. Edit Centric (talk) 08:03, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nostradamical, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 17:37, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
Please try to be somewhat more constructive in your AfD comments. Random insults about the articles or their authors are not helpful. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 17:52, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi Willydick. I have reverted the table you added to LGBT, because the source you cited doesn't actually have anything to do with LGBT populations in the United States. If you mistakenly cited the wrong Census Bureau publication, please feel free to re-add the table with an appropriate citation. Natalie (talk) 22:54, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
Why did you nominate Punching Mercury for AfD? It clearly fails notibility and is not a controversial deletion. ttonyb1 (talk) 02:06, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
You should know that, if you wish to nominate this page for deletion, you must provide a rationale for why you believe it should be deleted. Please return to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Punching mercury and add a rationale for deletion based on our deletion policy. Cheers! Redfarmer (talk) 03:02, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
What Wikipedia pages have I "vandalized"? I haven't vandalized a thing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.76.218.12 (talk) 02:47, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
I'm not exactly sure what you're attempting to do by tagging articles like Dick Cheney, Hello, Lou Dobbs, and Utah for speedy deletion, but if it continues, this account will be blocked from editing. Such edits are considered disruptive and are completely unacceptable. --auburnpilot talk 05:30, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
Please do not put speedy tags on articles that obviously do not warrant them. This is considered vandalism. Looking through your history, you have a history of mixing good and bad edits to prolong your life on Wikipedia. Treat this as a final warning; this behavior will not be tolerated, and you will be blocked if you continue to edit problematically. bibliomaniac15 01:58, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
((unblock|Your reason here))
below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Killiondude (talk) 05:48, 7 December 2009 (UTC)