This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
re: Neo-ninja. I rv'ed this article back to the last coherent version, it was vandalism. Please do not blnak the rticles if suggestinog for AfD or CSD. Xaosflux 16:55, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
(Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:SAMAS") I guess I got carried away. You did leave the deletion request, though?
It really doesn't look like a CSD to me, please re-add it if you would like, this article has been around for 10 months though, probally an AfD would be more approriate. Xaosflux 17:01, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
As it is now as of your revert, it can stay. The one before my edits, on the other hand, highjacked the article to make a personal attack on a website.
Great, Thanks for your help! Xaosflux 17:06, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
Hello. Thanks for letting me know about all the reversion on that page. I went there just now to take a look, and looks like it isn't happening anymore. I'll try to keep an eye there and see if it happens again, because that section is legitimate and has no reason not to be there.--Kaonashi 17:23, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
Thank you for helping with this article, I agree with you that this information is suitable for inclusion. Unfortunately, it seems that much of the material that was blanked was actually a copyvio from [1]. So it can't be included verbatim in the article.
Regards,
Demiurge 13:47, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
And why do you insist on referring to my editing as vandalism? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.108.159.41 (talk • contribs)
Take a look at this edit or this one. As you can see, in addition to reverting the vandalism you are at the same time altering the syntax of these pages in a way that causes it to display incorrectly. This is obviously a problem. What do you think is causing it? Canderson7 (talk) 21:33, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
I'm sorry about that- when I said I had around 1000+ edits, I was refering to my contributions as an anon before (and sometimes after) I made my acount, as well as MegamanZero. :) Anywho, sorry for the misconception, and I very much thank you for your advice, as well as your compliment on my pictures. Thanks! Regards, MegamanZero 2:46 6.December 2005 (UTC)
I didn't even think about those! Wasn't accusing you of being misleading, your current count is:
I did notice you have lots of minor edits, I did not look them up, are they really minor, or just marked that way?
In any event you do have good edits, even though I oppose your RfA right now, many other may not, so good luck! xaosflux T/C 00:43, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
Here's a Barnstar for you, thanks for reverting vandalism on my userpage. You deserve it anyway - there have been countless times while I have been on RC Patrol, I have spotted vandalism, and you have beat me to it in reverting it. Izehar 13:01, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
I'm not experimenting, i'm adding a redirect. You catch me just before i can finish it!. --Academia de las Artes y las Ciencias 18:38, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
Dear sir, Would you please revert to my last saved version and lock the article? The anon user is hammering the article. Thanks 0waldo 22:30, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
P.S. BTW, I just loved the banners you had on the left side of your page - especially the No BS and No Dumbass :) So cool! 0waldo 01:37, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
Thank you for your note. Yes, I do realize that and I fully expect to see it reverted. However, this editor is a newbie and he might not be entirely familiar with Wikipedia procedures. Anyway, just trying to be helpful here. Cheers Jbetak 20:50, 4 December 2005 (UTC) very
so ur telling me i dont have proof of saddam hussein being a dictator?, lets see here he ruled with an iron fist, made his countrymen kill thousands of kurds, was for years and years the only available person to run for office, that doesnt seem like a president thats a dictator, stop being politically correct, i dont like bush or kerry i hate both, but cmon u know he was a dictator —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.239.14.176 (talk • contribs)
I am learning quickly, Mr Heah.
After you attempted to lable me as a "sock puppet" earlier tonight, you have now somehow reported me as a "vandal", and my pages are apparently being monitored by the "Counter Vandalism Unit".
You play dirty -- especially considering that I am a total newbie.
Once again, heah, you have attempted to sabatoge my efforts to add to the body of knowledge on the subject of Poppers/alkyl nitrites, as you have been doing from my very first contribution two nights ago.
Anyone who reads my contributions to the subject, can readily dessearn that I am not a "sock puppet", that I am not a "vandal", and that the information I am adding is credible. I can fully support anything I add.
I ask that you halt your attacks on me personally, and instead, read what I am adding to the subject, and become more knowledgeable about it yourself. I thought that's what Wikipedia is all about. I'm certain the Internet community at large believes that's what Wikipedia is all about. It will be disturbing if it turns out Wikipedia is controlled by people such as "heah", who attacks those with whom he does not agree. If this turns out to be the case, and as the larger community learns about it, Wikipedia's image will be sullied, and it's perceived integrity diminished.
Allabout2006 07:27, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
[04:00:26] <Vilerage> computer wl add Xaosflux
[04:00:27] <Computer2> User:Xaosflux is now a member of the whitelist federation...
It didn't recog. your entry since you're not whitelisted, but you are now! enjoy! --VileRage (Reply|C|Spam Me!*) 09:01, 25 November 2005 (UTC)
Yay, my very first Barnstar! Thanks! Bmdavll 05:20, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
Just wanted to thank you for the vandalism revert on my user page. I appreciate it! -- Joe Beaudoin Jr. Think out loud 05:36, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
You were listed on the Wikipedia:Wikipedians by D&D alignment page as being associated with the Lawful Good alignment. As part of the Wikipedia:User categorisation project, these lists are being replaced with user categories. If you would like to add yourself to the category that is replacing the page, please visit Category:Wikipedians by D&D Alignment for instructions. --Cooksey 15:59, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my discussion page. I find it quite amusing that someone decided to proclaim their love for me there. :) --Yamla 05:47, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
Thank you for reverting the vandalism of my user page today. It got popular for vandals today.Thanks again.--Dakota t e 20:48, 12 December 2005 (UTC) I'm sure you'd do the same for me, happy editing! xaosflux T/C 23:51, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
The Bush page had to be deleted temporarily as part of the process of deletion defamatory edit histories. That will happen every time that idiot who posts them comes back. It is not a matter of debate but a requirement laid out by Jimbo to protect WP legally. A non-vandalised version of the page will be available shortly. FearÉIREANN\(caint) 01:40, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
Enough with the nonsensical vandalism! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Drdeath (talk • contribs)
he's so disgusting. How can you endorse that sort of behaviour? --J7 04:42, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
Xaosflux,
I was not aware that I had deleted any text (I'm almost certain I didn't). As for my edit on the first paragraph, the small change that has been made completely changes the meaning on my sentence. I'll be more careful with my edits. Can I register as a user? I usually do small edits as an anonymous, but would like to have an account so they can be traced back to me. Thanks! Ignacio ----—Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.154.179.138 (talk • contribs)
I never actually use the IRC room, but the reason I wasn't on the whitelist may be that I just changed my account name from User:Christopherparham to User:Christopher Parham. Christopher Parham (talk) 01:46, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
I didn't post nonsense. I posted facts. I know a lot more about this stuff than you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.51.97.185 (talk • contribs)
Category: Red-Skinheads Category: Skinheads Against Racial Prejudice Category: RASH Category: Anti-Racist Action Category: Antifa
xaosflux Talk/CVU 01:57, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
Shut up. You aren't cool. Wikipedia SUCKS. The Seigenthaler incident has proven its falbility, and now I'm going to expose it by taking advantage of its holes. Now shut up. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.133.205.8 (talk • contribs)