The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  Sandstein  06:06, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

12 Apostles (record label) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD, plus 2 of the 3 artists that actually have an article listed aren't even notable plus Girl Talk has released only one thing under this label which is Stop Cleveland Hate and I'm not sure if that is notable either. JayJay^{Talk to me} 00:01, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 00:08, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:08, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Lacks sources for verification Shii (tock) 14:28, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep Definitely known in dance music circles about six years ago, they had a distribution deal and released a number of records - http://www.discogs.com/label/12%20Apostles - and ROC (now that the link points to the right artist!) are notable - but as Shii notes, there aren't many sources, and their current status is unclear the way the article's written now. Fosse8 (talk) 00:15, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep This is a prime example of an article that could be improved by adding the relevant sources. Give it a chance! 98.28.12.216 (talk) 18:47, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment I can't find squat JayJay^{Talk to me} 19:30, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 00:10, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

---

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 12:00, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.